thelogicalview.co.uk

Tag: society

  • The successor to Sir Kier? Simple..

    This blog is a non-personal comment on how the human lives on the surface of Earth, the spinning mass of rock held in place by the gravitas of Helios. How the biology of one human, which by the definition of life had to exist from two humans, male and female, and how it is linked with other humans in a small grouping which is called a tribe or bigger to a society, is organised according to survival not greed is a genuinely fascinating subject.

    Survival means fighting when needed to defend your territory, from where does come food and water and in some parts of the world still does though the ‘UK’ departed from such logical principles a while back and food now comes from all parts of the spinning Earth and water comes through a very complicated processing system so logically where it exactly comes from is a matter of definition.

    Survival also means communication and ease of communication is a direct formula to the outcome for that society. How communication links with the physical survival of the network of humans down to their individual biology could be said and of course, to the land itself, (and obviously this blog is careful here with the current zeitgeist in the ‘UK’ being as it is) to fall into natural structural patterns reflecting both the actual biology and the sort of chemical interaction which produces different functions, leadership being one of them, or ‘leadership’ because the human has given this function a word yet in the natural world, of which the humans in the ‘UK’ are not now considered a part, the function – the function – of leadership arises from the land and whichever particular grouping of biology we are talking about. This could be earthworms, beetles, seagulls, rats, deer, spiders, crabs or wolves, ah no, not wolves now, so wild boar, again returned to native lands (illegally in the 1990s possibly by desperate residents of the Forest of Dean where human groupings go back virtually untouched to before the mists of time and experiencing the unhappy clash of C21 ‘UK’ policies).

    Having established that leadership is a natural part of any society, which is biology, and also, as an aside, where different biologies according to strength and gender and cognition have a natural spectrum, as observed by Aristotle, to fulfil a particular function in order for its society to survive and although he didn’t write in particular I’m sure he would agree that us autistic humans generally do work best in the male function regardless of biological man or woman but as he was in mortal form in the fourth century BCE then it was only the Earth, Helios (hot in the latitudes of Athens and Macedonia), the built environment of local stone and wood, and writing being on papyrus not the paper of modern times and long, long before the tip into the never-never land of digital tech so he observed the general categories of male and female, and how a society functioned according to strength and temperament. Of course society included slavery as a natural part of all ancient societies so his references to slaves and certain biology and temperament as part of society functioning, well, what he was meaning is alas far lost now in this world of the increasing individual as god.

    Whether there is no commentary and a biological society is just functioning, which hunter gatherer’s do just not have time to do, or whether there is commentary from when times had become much easier and there was both some study time, or leisure time maybe for others, and something to write on, it does not matter. The structure of a society must exist regardless, if it wants to survive at all.

    This brings this blog (totally inpersonal) to the subject of leadership with the ‘UK’. Obviously there is much debate going on in the present time, both within the governing Labour party and within the ‘UK’ as a whole. This blog is putting a solution to this quandry where questions of leadership came to the conclusion that unless a serious challenge is made (through administration processes these days and ballot boxes, not through the processes of strong arms) then the boat must not be rocked because all sorts of elections and events are coming up, and politics in the ‘UK’ is in such a precarious position that best just not to rock that boat.

    The suggestion put forward by this blog is that there is a natural successor to Sir Kier, someone who would be in a position to begin the process of realignment with the Truth, the real facts, the Logical state of affairs on Planet Earth. The requirements of a political leader in the ‘UK’ have been included by some to be that no one, absolutely no one, under the age of 40, and no one who has not had some kind of a real job, no matter where on the manual to manager etc., scale that falls. This is utterly sensible given the lowering age and that relentless race to the most individual and personal that can be of the Members of Parliament now. This is where that suggestion parts company with leadership before the British political system and leadership in the British political system. In the natural biological societies there have been many leaders under the age of 40, and if they can step up when needed, many young people are strong at 15. We do not know how old Boudica was but she was unlikely to have been over 40, and note the ‘she’ there, there are a few females who are capable of performing the true leadership function of reference to land not politics, and it is not possible to speak for him, but Aristotle would surely agree.

    But to continue the point, there is a natural successor to Sir Kier and curiously only came into Parliament from a newly created MP due to Local Government Reorganisation in Cumbria in 2023, so very new. Markus Campbell-Savours, the MP for Penrith and Solway is over 40 years old, though would be included in function of a leader, not age, and on a quick list of what is needed for the descent into political chaos, already his actions show him to be the man. He voted against the Government in the tragedy of inheritance tax being taken from farmers. His MP seat in the not just rural but far out rural lands of Cumbria where until recently many people had not gone further than their local big market town, because they were so busy on the land and fishing and from where such very strong and resilient communities existed over millennia. His voting against the ….er…. dictatorial government gained him the suspension of the whip. Markus C-S knows the biological reality of society on the land, and he voted accordingly. Alas the change of mind over the Assisted Dying Bill does not continue the Logic, especially from such a rural area where the few humans still able to farm and fish are still so aligned into the reality of life and passing between Helios and Earth, but such are the times. However, defying the urban government and speaking for the generations of farmers, most of whom have never had a holiday, never been abroad, eat by no air miles, see it as an honourable way of life if children continue the work instead of heading off to the ‘uni’, this is the sign of a real leader.

    Going further, his Icelandic genetics of mother would be so very useful at the moment as the desperate humans seek the last possible supplies of raw materials to perpetuate the world of tech, and the growing world of tech. To have a leader in place who would participate in the focus on the region of Earth now in the headlines, Greenland, Iceland, and the complications of needed resources and national governments, this would be very useful. Going even further, a very useful partnership would form if a whole new political party was formed, and which the practical leader of the Conservatives would surely join. The Practical Political Party of Kemi Badenoch and Markus Campbell-Savours would provide an alternative to the growing Reform party who is only there and growing because of the disjunct of leadership between Helios and Earth which has happened in the ‘UK’. It is only a suggestion, but a Logical one. Reform is on the rise, and there is no doubt about it, there is a bit of hype going with this, and the media excitement when another MP jumps ship and appears in Reform (not literally but that is a very old metaphor). If a Practical Party was formed to also counteract the increasing chaos in political leadership, this would give the voters two alternative options, one aiming for the headlines, and one aiming for survival on the land.

  • The Nobel Nuclear Peace Prize, a new award or a logical and noble amalgamation?

    The Will of Alfred Nobel, the Swedish industrial successful person who died in 1896 (130 Solar turns ago) shows he made enough money from manufacture of goods, amongst them armaments (weapons of warfare) to leave the Will substantial enough to set up global prizes for Chemistry, Physics, Physiology or Medicine, and Literature, and that 5th category of the Nobel Peace Prize.

    Now, 130 Solar years ago is a very long time. Not a long time in the history of Earth (45 billion solar turns), or the earliest evidence of humans, arising from previous hominid type biological creatures and which this blog must not get distracted into the geographical groupings of how these hominids survived in all the various astonishingly intricate and magical networks of life on Earth in hot, cold, coastal, mountainous, arid, delta, forest, desert, no it must not. But these hominids have been around a long time, and the humans who are industrialists and ‘scientists’ are only since the ‘Industrial’ revolutions of first coal and steam, then electricity. To be able to award a global prize at all, maybe Nobel was the first. Yes, just checked on Google, the 1901 start of the Nobel Prizes were the first international awards.

    Alfred Nobel in both inventing and manufacturing all sorts of things, amongst them weapons of war, in late 1800s was factually engaging with a very different physical society to 2026. And Norway and Sweden were a very different physical society to the Mediterranean latitudes and further on south through the Sahara to the Equator. Armaments were ground objects, air warfare did not exist. The Italo-Turkish war in 1911 had not happened, WWI had not happened, WWII obviously not, and so on, into the rapid collapse of all Logical scale to conflict.

    And in a logical progression, neither had nuclear.

    Because the Will of Alfred Nobel was left according to how he saw matters at the time, and possibly because even he saw a slightly Illogical direction of travel in western society and knowledge that he built in these prizes in the first place, what are the criteria for reassessing a past action according to present day reality? The answer is, it’s not done, because the original person had made the money and had the right to state in his Will that prizes of those categories be awarded.

    Mmm….difficult. What if Alfred Nobel himself would now worry about the state of affairs (state of human civilization on Earth) in 2026? His categories of chemistry, physics, physiology, all then were separate categories, each combining in the realm of the mysterious life on Earth, far beyond the ken or control of any one human. Literature is a recent human invention, or the modern book is, and peace there has never been on earth, nor goodwill to all mankind. Now with the arrival of a category of nuclear technology, of ‘the bomb’, where does this define the definition of Nobel’s world of late 1800s. Nuclear warfare is factually a combination of those chemistry, physics and physiology (not literature of course) expertise, and is now used as the ultimate Peace holder, that is, by having nuclear bombs then peace ensues because nobody actually wants to press that button.

    If it were a legal case with barristers standing up in court, would it be argued that Alfred Nobel’s original intention is now null and void because of the developments since? The arrival of nuclear which stands over and above all the previous categories (but not over Helios) and which is held up as the keeper of peace, can also be seen as the creator of the greatest conflict, in the pecking order of rights and opinions.

    If Alfred Nobel was alive in physical today, would he add a 6th Nobel Prize, that of nuclear negation? Apart from the confusion of some countries using nuclear for energy supply, and which John Swinney First Minister, is so against despite the precarious situation of Scotland, preferring instead to build 1,000s of giant wind turbines, but if there were a clear distinction drawn between nuclear technology used for a bomb and nuclear technology used for energy supply, amongst those countries in 2026 who have an active ‘bomb’, would he add that 6th Nobel Prize as a Nobel Nuclear Peace Prize? The first nuclear holding country who can lay out its component parts of what was once a bomb and prove it is dismantled gets awarded the huge gold medal of Nobel Nuclear Peace Prize.

    If that happened, and the resulting dismantling top down automatically dismantled all the other nuclear holding countries, down into those who wish to have one merely to counteract that top of the pyramid, and warfare was reduced to traditional (from 1911) air warfare, how much less confusion would there be on the surface of the Earth?

    Of course if time really were taken back to Alfred Nobel’s lifetime then neither would there be any air warfare, and how much less confusion would there be on the surface of the Earth from no air warfare (and no aeroplanes for leisure either)?

    As the Nobel Peace Prize was left to award from the Norwegian Nobel Committee and the other Prizes to the Swedish Nobel Committee, what if both those Committees (both far northern countries on the spinning Earth) were to have a good lunch together with plenty of Northern liquid refreshment, and decide either to disband all Nobel Prizes, to acknowledge that in the time since first they were awarded that alas, human society on Earth no longer represents the reality of Alfred Nobel, or create a new Nobel Prize of the Alfred Nobel Prize for Nuclear Peace?

  • Marketplace Money: Market and Oikos

    This blog, written from the perspective of the observable and measurable facts of life on Earth which are that Helios, Grian, Ra, Ri, Hvare-khshaeta, there are many names for the same fact, and that fact of Helios appearing and disappearing at the angle and therefore heat strength of latitude, is always measuring to that one baseline fact for all humans, regardless of subject, and not at all from a personal perspective. A personal perspective is about an individual but a group of 10 humans standing in the same place would be at the same latitude therefore Helios would rise and set at the same angle over all of them, and they would all see the same environs surrounding them, if they used their eyes not their phones.

    Marketplace Money: Market and Oikos will become a subscription blog upcoming, when the tech is navigated (navigated being yet another appropriation of an ancient word from entire history of human societies until the last 100 or 200 years when it had electricity, leaving apart this bizarre digital age which will fail in a second at a major Solar flare, including this blog of course because this blog is written from the perspective of these basic facts), while thelogicalview.co.uk in general will continue putting out apparently unrelated subject matter, except it is all looking at the same baseline facts, which is how human society fits into reality, which is Helios, Earth, Light, gravity, water, food, shelter, and all within a specific geography.