A Blog

  • Nuclear equality?

    A Logical Blog asking Logical Questions

    The Equality of no Nuclear. Over the early months of the year 2025 by the Gregorian calendar, President Trump raised the subject of nuclear weapons, saying, ‘There’s no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many. You could destroy the world 50 times over.’

    In February statements spoke of America, Russia and China, and the idea of nuclear arms control, and that was said from the American President, not from Russia and China, but it was put out there. Where is ‘out there’? Well, that is into the modern digital tech world, entirely dependent on electricity from big power stations down to the i-phone charger, and without which nothing now would run, not that world leaders consider that real baseline.

    But out there it was stated, and then in early March President Trump told reporters that he was in favour of denuclearization amongst global powers. That would be the global powers who ‘have nuclear’, being the nine of America, China, Russia, France, the ‘UK’, North Korea, Israel, Pakistan and India.

    The nuclear spectre raised its head as Pakistan and India faced each other, the world held its breath, which of course is a meaningless term because the natural world never follows news events on a digital screen and it is only the human stuck is this strange in between, and President Trump again took the role of a leader and some talking was done, and the nuclear button was not pressed over on the complicated border region between Pakistan and India. Phew.

    Now the matter of nuclear weapons has swung the other way, not among the top dogs in the global realm who have this nuclear facility, but looking down the ladder, the same President Trump took on Iran with a smaller than could have been missile lobbed over, and Iran responded with a smaller than could have been, and possibly the heat was taken out of the explosive situation, for the time being. That’s clever leadership tactics too, because leaders should be engaging with each other in that mixture of talking for mutual benefit or engaging in a kind of thinking martial arts tactics because leadership is a difficult role, and for us masses, it is none of our business to sit and opinionate all day when we don’t have any responsibility.

    This blog is not an opinion but a measurement, and as the question of nuclear arms has appeared in these various ways in the first half of this year, it would be a very good idea to freeze the frame and keep both directions on view, before they sink beneath the daily new events in this tragic human world. As 9 countries have nuclear weapons, and they are meant to be a deterrent, why should Iran not have one, or a few, too? The west says nuclear weapons aren’t safe in countries not part of the civilized western world, and already views North Korea as somewhere far out on the fringes of inclusion. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent should not every jurisdiction have a nuclear? Then it would be an equal safety for all.

    Looking the other way, up the ladder, to return to President Trump’s radical statements on denuclearisation made only a few months ago, will this be the paradigm missed in the modern era? If, on paper, a little diagram was doodled of the lower orders, seen as mad, bad and dangerous and who must at all costs be prevented from gaining these dangerous nuclear facilities, up through the perceived order of things to the major powers who believe they and their nukes hold the balance of peace, why can we not start at the top line instead of the bottom line?

    As the ‘UK’ gears up to invest more in missile and arms manufacture, and talks of security in this dangerous age, yet at the same time relies on manufactured goods from all those countries who come in for the stinging criticism from the pious ‘UK’, and as gun boats were despatched to the Channel Islands to scare France, not so many years ago over fishing questions, the existence of nuclear weapons designed to obliterate the enemy only stands like a great towering mountain, brooding over the daily life below.

    If President Tump followed though on his statements given out a few months ago on denuclearization amongst the global powers, what would the world look like, the human world that is? Or rather, if it was followed through to actual denuclearization? If no country has any nuclear weapons the top slice of stress would be evenly sliced off, the line brought down evenly instead of the see-saw reactions and this Russian roulette of friend or foe. If all jurisdictions were nearer ground level and the nuclear deterrent became a nuclear equality of no one has nuclear, how much aggravation would evaporate in international relations?

    It would a really good weekend event if the leaders of the 9 met for a serious chat. Are we going to actually use a nuclear? If not, just come down and start the dismantling process. Such a move would show that global co-operation is possible, and maybe the best proof of all, and really there’s nothing to lose because no world leader would really want to go down in history as the one who pressed the button, not that anyone would know about it anyway after that, but still…not great if there is any posterity. But if a summit of 9 came out and announced that hereinafter the line of this towering aggravation will be now calmly taken down quite a few notches, what is there to lose? And there would be a lot to gain.

  • A Logical Blog

    Trump -v- Iran – a Disaster Day for Logic?

    Trump -v- Iran on Summer Solstice 2025 – a Disaster Day for Logic? What on Earth has happened this weekend? As Solar time remains the same as ever, human time has now gone mad. The news of a rapid escalation of ‘events’ in the ‘middle East’, the term given by the west because of the spin of the earth, spinning into Sunrise and where there is no middle because there is no beginning or end of a spin, is this the last nail in the coffin of logical government? Or, has President Donald Trump massively shot himself in the foot?

    Is it the same man who somewhere back in February of this year said words to the effect that the USA had plenty of nuclear missiles ‘which could destroy the world 50 times over’ so why add more, and were there not noises of talks between President Trump, Russia and China about ‘de-nuclearization’? No more missiles is one thing, but a coming down, a de-nuclear, is, or was, possibly the most Logical action anyone could take in the human world in this present time. An open-handed action to bring a line down would have filtered down a great deal of other matters, like the biological world has a vast network of seen and unseen processes going on in the zone around one fact, and which the modern humans have well lost sight of.

    In this muddling of geography, ethnicity, belief, historical let’s call them ‘matters’, not to mention the climate disaster (some call it change), and the imminent collapse of supply chains, water supply, etc., if President Trump had followed through on that comment of de-nuclearization, how much would that have filtered on down through the chaos going on? Intention is like the subtle zone in the biological realm, it is not quantifiable yet has a profound factual outworking.

    The ‘middle East’ is geographically and ethnically neither western Europe nor the USA, which is its own landmass with ocean on both sides. It could be said that the nuclear issue is the nastiest of all controversies between the different political zones on Earth. In this crazy age of globalism where the ‘west’ seeks to bring (or impose) democracy and individual values on just about everywhere from North to South Pole and all around Earth, the nuclear issue stands totally opposite to that, the nuclear powers retain the right to err.. retain their nuclear weapons, while telling other countries (and where the divisions are already there in history, religion, culture) that they are very, very bad for wanting a nuclear weapon.

    If nuclear weapons are so bad that some countries cannot have them, and the USA, or President Trump himself ordered, that Iran should be attacked without warning, then Logically the only solution is that probably now throw-away phrase (because it has been thrown away) of “de-nuclearization”. Why has this President who was overwhelmingly voted in for the hope that some common sense can be slotted into the last days of human existence on earth committed this completely idiotic act?

    As well as heightening the nuclear issue with these ‘bad Iranians’, the credibility which President Trump had in restoring some common sense to trade (and apologies to all the hard working trades people who are affected by tariffs but overall, that is common sense and a pity the UK doesn’t have a leader who thinks of its own security) has now evaporated. Any people or any country which is humiliated, as Iran now is, doesn’t bow the knee and accept their wrongdoing, it only makes bad matters so much worse.

    Nearly there was a nuclear button pressed between Pakistan and India, so recently, and it was the same President of the USA who quickly stepped in, and the world breathed a sigh of relief, disaster averted. Now the same President does this inflammatory and idiotic action in the middle East like a bull in a china shop.

    As the UK does not have any, or not nearly enough, young people who could turn up to even train for a fighting army let alone go off and actually do it, and as there are nuclear weapons in the UK, this would be such a very good opportunity for the UK government to show it had some teeth and unilaterally announce that it is to disarm its nuclear weapons. Hypocracy is just the worst situation of all and on the principle of ‘if you don’t use it, then lose it’ which is usually used for cognitive brain exercises that if you don’t keep active then you lose your faculties, but applying that to nuclear weapons, if the UK are not intending to actually use the nuclear weapons then what’s the point of all that time, money and effort to maintain them, and the UK could be the first to both announce and act – the two together – that it is beginning to dismantle all nuclear facilities.

    A long time ago philosophers from Damas, Cairo, Paris, London, would meet and discuss, and a long time ago the trading network on the major ports and inland networks from there, all took full account of difference in geography, culture, belief, language, the long history, and it was a vibrant and engaged world. That time has passed and will never again be possible, because the west has burnt the bridges behind and in front, but of all the actions which could put the widest and most pervasive signal that this high tide mark is very very bad, if President Trump had continued on the de-nuclearization idea and even if just an idea, instead of what has happened this Summer Solstice weekend, then maybe the tide would have turned back and something of a normal ebb and flow just might have held. Instead we have a tsunami of god knows what, and the concept of governance in shreds.

    Thank goodness Solar times does still hold. The northern hemisphere on Earth is now going into shorter days, less Light, down to the Winter Solstice, from where the baby Light will be born and the days slowly slowly lengthen again. No hope of such predictability for the human realm now.

  • A Blog

    Drawing a fine line: the draw of Catholicism.

    Why are young people heading to Catholicism? The facts show that Catholicism has grown a big following, almost from nowhere, out of the several decades of runaway consumerist, credit fuelled, lifestyle image, cheap holidays, 24/7 internet shopping and the general turning upside down of anything considered normal or natural, and until the 1980s there were still a few normal and natural places and spaces even in the Protestant western world. Since then things have taken even a new turn of illogicality and is about to take the whole life zone down with it.

    The repeated appearances of ‘the Catholic church’ as opposed to the Church of England, or the very many different names of Protestant denominations (and which a quick look up of that word meaning is to state which currency a transactions takes place, though to de-nominate could also presumably mean someone who was nominated is now de-nominated, but who knows…and one thing is for sure, the very many thousands of Protestant denominations do keep themselves very clearly separate)is taking on a kind of identity in the media, at events, and when something has become like a shorthand, it is a good thinking exercise to ask what it is a shorthand for.

    Now Jordan Peterson has entered the zone of ‘Catholicism’ though it sounds like that is raising more questions than planned, the shorthand of ‘Catholicism’ must be an entity in itself. That does not mean to say anything profoundly philosophical in terms which are far beyond this writer’s ken and not just from dyslexia, but the more philosophical the terms, the further the focus goes from the basic logic for life on earth, which is that everything is governed by the Sun, the Light emanating from that vast and remarkable source, and the ball of rock pulled into a circle by gravity, orbiting Sun along with various other bodies, and which we are so lucky to have a life zone on Earth, and for how much longer we do not know. This is why it is a curious thing when after something like 2,000 years since the emergence of the Christians, not as the New Testament would have it but from an overstretched Roman Empire, a few fairly psychologically unstable people, and a lot of things cobbled together from existing Greek and Roman practices, and given an extra something to appear novel, and of course after the 2,000 years since to the point where in western Protestant civilization the new religion of science and data now hold the call on what is right and wrong, ‘scientific method or unscientific’ is the terminology, why is specifically Catholicism taking centre stage in this way?

    It is not even as though it is the religion of Catholicism appearing like this. Certainly the recent passing of Pope Francis was a global event, and as this Logical blog asked, why such a difference between the public Catholic events and the public Church of England events collapsing in on itself. There are a very many people in the world today who genuinely believe the belief put by the Christian church, whichever Catholic or Protestant or whichever denomination it is in Scotland, England, Wales, or anywhere around the globe, and that is the curious thing about this recent return to Catholicism, because it now does not appear to be really about the religion, as in the belief, the practices, the rituals, because of time as measured to basically heaven or hell. If it was really asked in a tick box exercise which of the fundamental teaching and beliefs did someone interested in Catholicism really truly believe, it might be hardly any, or even none. So, what is Catholicism, if not Catholicism?

    For a start there are the buildings, the beautiful cathedrals built on geometric principles and which geometry alone formulates a human’s psyche and sense of place, because micro is to macro and the whole of earth is really within such a geometry even though it has been so lost from view for so long. Many of the major cathedrals, Chatres, Glasgow, so many, have significant springs and water energy lines which dowsers can visibly trace, and often a meeting of significant points is found right under a font or an altar. The materials were the best, the stained glass, gold, oak wood, stone floors and steps worn just a little by thousands of feet over hundreds and hundreds of years. Candlelight and choirs and an organ, and the still sense of activity in different chapels, the lines of candles to be lit with 50p in the box and place a candle amongst others already lit by people we do not know, and for people who are never spoken but in our heart we know who they are, and even if a busy city is going on outside, the timeless few minutes or an hour, it is magical and mystical. A world waiting for the plume of smoke to rise over the Vatican, first black this year, heightened the tension, and then the white, and to have still one in the Catholic system in this world of plurality and cut and paste and viral multiplication, the clarity of the Catholic organisation in equal measure enables the visitor to enter without being bothered.

    Catholicism also, even with the fairly terrible abuses that have gone on by the nuns and monks, and the relentless reminder of guilt that many who actually grow up in the Catholic faith are burdened with, for the visitor is not at all demanding on the state of our soul. The average Protestant church greets at the door with the question of the state of your soul, even if not asked implicitly, it is hanging in the air, there is not much else. But Catholic churches with all the trimmings of magic and mysticism, the many beautiful objects, the white marble basin of water, the general silence of the place, paradoxically it is appearing as the geometric place where all the simplicity and beauty and ritual can be given, with no need to account for one’s belief or progression towards heaven. For the Protestant west this is a very strange occurrence in society, though for the Catholic continentals there has always been the threading through of popping in to Mass, the acknowledgement even if not devotion to the local saint, and the stronger family and community networks that exist around that, as the Protestants imploded into rational science and individualism.

    Jordan Peterson is talking about Catholicism, and it appears the true Catholics and the true philosophers are hard at it to explain whatever their position is, and to make sure he is limited into a really non Catholic box, because Catholicism is, well, religion, and philosophy is, well, philosophy. But what he is talking about in having been so important to young people, especially the boys cut adrift as feminism started to really destabilize society and normal behaviour of dating and socialising and societal rough and tumble fell silent now to the point now of the kind of religious witch hunt turned against men and against ‘populists’ who speak of tradition, and against those who see the necessity of basic structure in society, what he is talking about is quite fascinating to those interested in the long history of belief, of which this writer is one. The cathedrals are there, still as geometric and beautiful as ever, though mostly empty, and the many people young and old who have no place in society, because the form of society has been collapsed like the collapse of a big marquee, so really this is a marriage made in heaven, of the stability and gravitas and beauty of the Catholic structures should now be filling with all those put off the wheel by the deconstructualists, from New Labour onwards.

    It is really for a few decades that something has been changing, as shown by the numbers of people who walk The Camino to Santiago. Many many of those would say they are not Catholic believers, yet the act of a significant walk to a sacred place, and Santiago was an important pagan site long before the Christians appeared, and the rigours along the way, it changes everything, because of the limitations. Because of the limitations. Limitations bring focus, and focus is the logical position for us humans, because really there are no other options, and when the water runs out or supply chains are disrupted, then the focus of limitation appears like hitting the buffer. Midnight Mass also, in the last what? 10 years maybe?, it has become a significant event and many Catholic churches and high Protestants have seen an astonishing rise in people coming, but just for that event. Some churches have even put on a Midnight Mass if there wasn’t one before, because supply and demand are basic principles. And for us pagans who watch from the purely geometric position of Summer and Winter Solstice, the placing of Christmas so near the Winter Solstice and switching the Sun to the Son, and true Light to Jesus being the Light of the World, well, we can generously say how much we understand the desire for non religious folk to go into a church for midnight, the deepest darkest turn of one day to another, and watch the new candlelight being lit out of the darkness. It is a profound thing, though purely factual from the position of Earth and Sun and now so utterly lost in our society.

    Those wise young people looking for clarity and a sense of order, and who are finding it paradoxically in the buildings from where natural rhythms of society were taken away, it is a beautiful societal circle that old fashioned relationships could be made again, of whatever nature from friendships to partnerships where children will be along, and confidence grown again and a living civic model restore again with no doubt most Catholic priests not too fussed about what someone does or does not believe doctrinally, but just the sight of so many bums on seats, pews, and an appreciation of the formal ceremonial rituals and some coins in the donation box, well, what a surprise, civic society is to be found in Catholicism, in the geometric sense.

  • A Blog

    Would reverse logic be logical in Gaza?

    Would reverse logic be logical in Gaza? The natural human action if someone has a grievance is to continue, continue, continue, enough until the grievance is balanced out by action onto the other. When enough has been proved, then at least there is some satisfaction that the grievance did not go unnoticed. And of course in the natural order of things, the balance of life is held not by peace and love man, sharing and caring, empathizing and including, but by that basic and unalterable equation in the life zone on the Earth’s surface where everything is limited, and all participants (except the human) balance between themselves of resources and networks, and that includes eating each other, because where else would they get their food? From the tiniest bacteria to the biggest elephant, all are within a network of survival where the life zone is circulated within the defining parameter of gravity, water, and Sunlight.

    Several species of ant take slaves, lions work together to get a gazelle, just as the large sea creatures position themselves together when the shoals come into shore, to ensure maximum food at the optimum time. Such is the connectivity and intelligence within species, and the native tribes would be more a part of the natural world than what is now the different perceived habitation of the human. Even the early empires of the eastern Mediterranean, of the vast Persian empire, the Egyptians, Hellenistic Greece, everything measured still to geo-graphy, but also the psychology of the modern human species to control more than is needed for food. Was it the Third Punic War, where Rome triumphed and the stage was open for expansion, domination, and the watchful eye of Fortune conveniently avoided? In 63 BCE the Roman army sacked Jerusalem, and the various sieges and destruction during the 60s BCE is a long time ago, but the geography is the same.

    In 2025, the Middle East (as defined from Britain, but in the Middle East they are just where they are) is a crisis and way beyond the ken of this writer. However, if focus comes back out instead of in deeper, there are just a few cogs in the chaos which show as a cause and effect. The modern human, when there’s a cause, just continues, beyond the need for food and water and sex which is the natural biological drivers but because Israel and Gaza are not a large empire territory, would it be possible to hold two things together? The biological ethnographic difference of peoples who have been natives in the area for thousands of years, and warring tribes are as natural as quarrelsome rooks, combined with the complications of modern politics, the west’s obsession with imposing democracy on every corner of the world (which has no corners, because it is sphere formed by gravity), the supply of weapons, which are called arms, armaments, and the global media conveying all aspects, from all points of view.

    If the one event of Hamas taking Jewish hostages in October 2023, and from which has unleashed a kind of nuclear bomb reaction, not surprisingly for the hostages and families involved, if that were seen as the highest peak of upset, regardless of how the whole conflict came to be, but just taking that one incident and drawing a line around it, what would happen if Hamas just released all remaining hostages and said, ‘We’ve made our point.’ Does focus become clearer when combat goes on, as logically it would be thought, or does it become clearer when reverse logic is applied, and the tug of war rope put down? If one side just stops, where does the winner/loser equation lie? What would Israel do, or the leader of Israel do, if all hostages were released, walked to the conflict line and returned to where they belong, what happens next?

    There is a phrase of someone who doesn’t take prisoners, and the general meaning is that they then don’t live with the confusion involved, the uncertainty, or the need to keep your prisoners secure but also fed and watered, all of which take resources which you might not have. To not take prisoners which have to be kept, is therefore liberating, and liberation of course is the opposite of being a prisoner. What if the people of Gaza had a poll to vote whether they wanted Hamas to return all prisoners, and to see if that would stop the bombing. To demarcate just that one action, and do it, is that warfare or leadership? Long gone are the days when conflicts were settled by an arm wrestle, and more’s the pity, but also long gone are the days when a leader also had to use some philosophical manoevering, some checks and balance for their own survival even apart from warfare, and as natural and inevitable as conflict is, why could not this very local and yet polar opposite conflict be a zone for a new kind of more cerebral conflict. Total destruction of the other is understandable, especially as the suffering grows by the day, but in such chaos there is even more possibility for testing out a reverse logic. If instead of losing it would be a gain, by showing one has the power of thought and action, then why not?

  • A Blog

    The Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury

    2025 is showing itself to be a complicated year for the Christian religion. A few months ago the very public exit of Justin Welby from the position of Archbishop of Canterbury, for all the reasons the exit was for, was preceded by weeks and months of air time and print space from the now so many different people and viewpoints holding some level of office within the CofE (Church of England). Without even a tiny diversion into the fascinating history of the 1400s and 1500s in Italy and northern Europe, and of course England, as to why and how Protestantism and the Church of England arose, this blog will just put all Protestant beliefs, including the Kirk in Scotland and the roughly 45,000 different denominations and sub groups and tiny groups under ‘Protestant’ meaning it arose from the 1400s, which is only about 500 years.

    In this same year, and very recently, a loved and respected Pope died, and the air time and print time and TV time was one huge global outpouring of grief, ceremony, gathering, traditional processes to be followed, plus the information that many young people are attending Catholic churches. Yet the Catholic church has a fairly terrible history of abuses, scandals, financial issues, (and looking back in history, were responsible for severing the relationship of the human to Helios, the governing power of Earth, before of course themselves being treated as the evil ones by the Protestants). Even for those who are within the Catholic church and hold to the beliefs and to the Christian god in the afterlife, the less than positive aspects of the Catholic church are public knowledge. Yet events as in recent weeks, and the smooth transition to a new Pope, have been as a united group of people, under one event and one person. And further, because the new Pope is an American, the Catholic church has seamlessly joined global politics with the offer of a possible Vatican hosting of peace talks thereby leapfrogging into the centre of the present day world crisis.

    So, the question is, why do these two underlying structures of western civilization show in public to be so diametrically opposite in 2025?

  • A Blog

    Assisted Dying, who is the relevant person here?

    Assisted Dying, that current heightened subject in the ‘UK’, has been passed by the Scottish Parliament today, to move on to Committee stage. The media channels, and especially BBC Radio 4, gives the matter central air time and not from the decision of a Parliamentary vote in favour. The subject is dying, and we are all going to die, because all humans are part of the life zone on planet Earth, just one of the bodies held in gravity around Helios. Because we live, we die, it is just a fact of life, no pun intended. The fact of life is also the fact of death, which in this question means physical matter death. The realm of spirit is different again, and one which evidence proves is as natural as life and death of physical matter, but spirit dimensions and ‘life after death’ are not the subject of the Assisted Dying debates going on in the present day.

    Each time this question meets the public sphere, as it certainly does when a Parliament votes to move it forward, as Westminster and Holyrood have now both done, and the Isle of Mann, and Jersey, but let’s stick with Westminster and Edinburgh, while strangely the go-ahead Welsh on language and respect for landscape features such as Yr Wyddfa (and you’d have to be a native Welsh speaker to pronounce that one, wouldn’t you!) have less room for discussion on the matter of assisted dying, because it is really Westminster and Edinburgh which BBC Radio 4 follow. Again today, again, because the subject of assisted dying is public news, the reflex is to give air time to someone in a wheelchair. In England that person is a well-known sportswoman, and in Scotland today, that person is an MSP. If it was said, what’s it got to to do with them, then accusations of discrimination against disabled people would fly, both are women so accusations of misogyny would soon follow, and everything heads to the usual shut down of any real discussion or relevance.

    What is missing in this debate on assisted dying, it could be said,(as one must say in this age of near paranoia of offending someone), is that it is nothing to do with anybody except the person errr……dying. In a logical blog it is the height of illogicality to interview anybody on the subject of assisted dying – with the stated framework of a likely 6 month expectation of life, before a certain death (which we all will have), in England at least but still the same principles are in the motion in Scotland – who does not have a terminal illness that is very likely to lead to a bad end, a painful end, a traumatic end for them and all around them, and a period where life is not the lovely exchanges around a bedside as someone gently slips away. Some people have that, the one who is dying and then those around them, and what a lovely way to go. For others who will not be having a peaceful ending with perhaps a bit of pain relief at the end but nothing too grotesque, how incredibly disrespectful is it to have BBC Radio 4 interviewing people who use wheelchairs. To use a wheelchair must be unbelievably frustrating, but it is not a terminal illness. Nor is mental disability, nor is old age, nor is depression and nor is anything else except a terminal illness which is only going one way.

    Why is it in this age of individualism, the ‘person centred’ obsession, the empathising and all the sugary psychological talk, that a person in bad pain, bad failing of bodily functions, possibly weeks or a few months, bad psychological state of having all the caring people staring at them 24/7, a person asking, begging, to be helped to move on, and which has no other interpretation than what they are saying, often someone who has lived a life to the full and not sat around, someone who is in a network of loving caring people who also do not want to see this unfolding horror of their last few weeks or months, why is it that they have to hear media channels holding a theatrical debate on everything but the obvious?

    Since the unfortunate case of Harold Shipman despatching many people under the job title of doctor in the NHS a certain paranoia has risen, that anyone talking about death means they want to kill people. The Christians have always had their own rationale, based on beliefs which are not logical – as measured to Earth and Helios – and no doubt other religions also have their reasons. The NHS believes citizens live in it, from cradle to grave, and to reject the NHS is not far off the Christians in their belief of salvation and hell. Isn’t it strange that there is an obsession of crime writing, crime films, crime research in the ‘UK’, where literary festivals not put on a crime event because that is the one which will sell out on opening sales, while history, geography, natural history, the makers and observers are lucky to fill part seats. Put against the obsession with crime, murder, problems in life, why does something as natural as assisted dying, for someone who is only going one way and which any physician with any basic understanding can see, why is this subject such a public spectacle in the ‘UK’?

  • A Blog

    The transgender crisis in Britain

    In the last few days a news item appeared in the ‘UK’ of how girls wishing to change gender are going to be tested for autism. This is an interesting one for several reasons and of course is only relevant at all because of the strange obsession with sex and gender which has taken hold in the last decade or so, and of course with the possibility of actually being able to go through a medical change. This post is not about what is a biological woman, and which has also been in the news recently, causing hours of debate. Logically that subject is as it always has been, and where the ancient Greeks had such a very sensible view that there was male and there was female, and then there were some males who were a bit more female and there were some females who were a bit more male, and such has ever been the human population all over Earth. Happily for the ancient Greeks, men-men had their place, men-women had their place in the household, and for the real women-women well, there was Lesbos just over the water.

    This comment is about the link made between girls wishing to change gender and that a test for autism could be made. Apparently statistics show a higher percentage of those wishing to change gender are autistic than the average, so there is a correlation. Why would this be? A few decades ago when a tiny number of people did change gender, to now when it has almost become those not questioning their gender have to apologise for being just as they are, where do sex/gender and autism stand? And why autistic girls, and not autistic boys? Why do autistic girls want to become boys but not so many autistic boys want to become girls?

    Because this blog is measured entirely from the logical point of view, where does logic sit in this matter? A logical approach would be to cross reference back over recent history, because as the medical facility to change gender has been a bit of a boom industry in the 2000s it is very easy to compare back to say, the 1960s, 1970s or 1980s when these sort of societal questions were just not in the public parlance. What is missing in this question of autistic girls and changing gender?

    Well, logically, society itself is missing in this debate in Britain. The public realm in which young and old live, males and females, and all the variations, never gets a look in now. The inversion of the public sphere – meaning a measurable public area – used to have an identity even if not actually living like a biological being, it still did have an identity to which the human related and engaged. Now in the strange psychological inversions that have taken place, probably largely from the digital screens which invert and invert again, those born in the 1990s, almost it seems into a digital screen, have no knowledge of society as an entity only a few decades back. In that society were groups of young people like the Famous Five, with George, real name Georgina, who wore her hair short, wanted to be called a boy’s name, and could stand as one of society’s greatest icons to the tomboy. What a great position to hold. If the balance of hormones puts a girl into a more masculine category and society allows the freedom to cut the hair, use a boy’s name, and not have to worry about the feminine complications in life then what better a life could there be?

    If ‘the tomboy’ was restored to its previous natural place, and autistic girls who felt uncomfortable in the present day female realm did not have to consider medically changing sex, with the proviso that you can’t actually change into the other sex, would that be a logical solution to this massive problem? In the distorted world of digital images and the selfie and the limitless supply of cheap clothes, make up, strange looking nails from a nail bar, hair extensions and large eye lashes, it is not really a surprise that autistic girls do not wish to identify with such things. If a specific category of ‘tomboy’ was restored, even with a box on forms to tick, how much confusion would reduce just from that? Possibly quite a lot.

    But if the societal identity was further asked, where does Britain stand on all humans measuring their identity to the public place? Nowadays the words space and place are used interchangeably, but on the Earth’s surface a space has to be a place. If instead of young people being encouraged to define themselves by anything but the public realm, this was turned on its head and the public realm was the definition, how could that be useful in lessening individual identity confusion? Hannah Arendt talked about the three realms of the public, the private, and then the social sphere, Walking around most British towns these days it isn’t possible to see any definition at all is it. What if the ‘UK’ government made a law to say that in the public realm, in which biological people look at each other, everyone regardless of sex should be covered by clothes from collar bone to elbow, and down to the knee. How would that change the sexual identity confusion going on today? Probably it would be a great relief for the autistic girls who grow up amongst females putting out sexual availability, obsessed by every like on their screens, obsessed by who is looking at them, by who said what to who and where, while autistic girls spend their time on more useful things and in more useful pursuits yet with no societal place now, only with the guys, the non transitioned guys that is. If there was both a law passed to take this overt sexual availability out of public places, and transport, and in the way females dress in organisations and conferences and out jogging, along with an official restoration of the place of the tomboy in society, how would that change the statistics of autistic girls wishing to change gender? Probably it would change it a lot.

  • A Blog

    Societal benefits of autism in the USA, and the ‘UK’

    After RFK Jr. made his comments about autistic people not working or paying taxes, did he ask himself how much tax Bill Gates pays? It is probably quite a lot, plus Bill Gates shows the classic autistic pattern of ….. dedication to work without the ego directing matters when he stepped down from Chairman back to running the functional side of his company. And how much money is raised in tax for the USA by clever young people who once upon a time would have been accounts clerks, librarians, technical drawers, engineers, natural scientists, indexers, patient teachers of useful subjects like maths and geography, and are now sucked into the digital world of coding and worse, the new AI. Whether they worked in the real world or in the new world, still a great deal of processes underpinning western society are done by those who do not have an ego, do have immense concentration and care about getting things right, and can be relied on to sort it out when a problem is identified.

    Yes of course there are some autistic people who don’t work and pay tax but the percentage overall is probably very small for those who don’t. Instead of making a public spectacle of himself in going after a cure for autistic people, who incidentally are not a recent blip in the progress of western civilization but we go back a long way, yes a very long way, and even in more recent history Sir Isaac Newton showed every indication that he was autistic, along with many others who could focus and observe over long periods, RFK Jr. could take a different approach.

    In order to improve workplaces generally to enable more work to be done rather than open plan chat, unhealthy buildings of artificial materials instead of stone and wood, bright lights and computer systems which will all fail at the first large Solar flare, RFK Jr. could put forward a policy initiative that there is an autistic person on every Board, every management committee, every facilities department, every school, every everything, and he will see just how useful autistic people are.

  • A Blog

    Solar flares, beautiful aurorae, earthquakes, digital collapse

    The Earth, the ball of rock surrounded by an atmosphere and containing a life zone in which humans inhabit, along with the millions and zillions of other organisms, is experiencing the affect (or is it the effect?) of the 11-year cycle of solar flares. These massive ejections are creating beautiful Northern Lights for those living in the north-ish of the northern hemisphere, and Southern Lights for those living on land masses near enough the South Pole to see. These magical light shows in the sky are not visible around the Equator due to the electromagnetic pull at either Pole, which creates the awesome display. It could be a huge concert, lights, action, plugs, the sky lit up, the humans amazed and entertained and it is something like that because electricity generates marvellous sights, from lightning flashes to aurorae. Science knows it is not an assistant of Helios flinging down flares onto Earth, neither is it the entertainment show and which this year are providing some spectacular images captured on the smart phones. The science of solar particles and the 11-year cycle is way too complicated for this blog, only the logical view is relevant, and the fundamental equation of gravitational balance between Helios and Earth.

    If another equation is measured, not scientifically but on the back of an envelope, is this time of solar flares causing greater than usual disruption to the earth surface. The 1859 Carrington Event flare was a big one and nothing has been seen on that scale since, but this year Myanmar experienced a big earthquake with the resulting devastation on the surface above it, California this week, and Spain also have had quakes. As some humans look outward at the more vivid than usual aurorae at North and South Poles, and some pick through rubble for weeks after a quake, what is the equation of impact if a big Solar flare in this time of big Solar flares just crosses the threshold of domestic, corporate, government, scientific, space technology, street lights and traffic lights, railways, water pumping stations, sensor operated entry doors and oh so much more, and the new kid on the block of the AI data generator centres. Has belief of the modern human crossed the threshold into now a religious certainty that the digital world looks back at Earth from a protected zone, a realm and place completely outside of Helios and Sun and utterly invincible (as long as you have the right charger). It is not an easy prospect to contemplate, but when is the flare going to be hurled to Earth which does just that, it turns out the lights. The aurorae will go on, beautiful because of the strength of the flare, but who would be appreciating them then?

  • A Pagan Blog

    The Emperor Julian, A Hymn to King Helios

    What I am now about to say I consider to be of the greatest importance for all things and have a share in existence and a reasoning soul620 and intelligence, but above all others it is of importance to myself. For I am a follower of King Helios. And of this fact I possess within me, known to myself alone, proofs more certain that I can give.621 But this at least I am permitted to say without sacrilege, that from my childhood an extraordinary longing for the rays of the god penetrated deep into my soul; and from my earliest years my mind was so completely swayed by the light that illumines the heavens that not only did I desire to gaze intently at the sun, but whenever I walked abroad in the night season, when the firmament was clear and cloudless, I abandoned all else without exception and gave myself up to the beauties of the heavens; nor did I understand what anyone might say to me, nor heed what I was doing myself. I was considered to be over-curious about these matters and to pay too much attention to them, and people went so far as to regard me as an astrologer when my beard had only just begun to grow. And yet, I call heaven to witness, never had a book on this subject come into my hands; nor did I as yet even know what that science was. But why do I mention this, when I have more important things to tell, if I should relate how, in those days, I thought about the gods? However let that darkness622 be buried in oblivion. But let what I have said bear witness to this fact, that the heavenly light shone all about me, and that it roused and urged me on to its contemplation, so that even then I recognised of myself that the movement of the moon was in the opposite direction to the universe, though as yet I had met no one of those who are wise in these matters. Now for my part I envy the good fortune of any man to whom the god has granted to inherit a body built of the seed of holy and inspired ancestors, so that he can unlock the treasures of wisdom; nor do I despise that lot with which I was myself endowed by the god Helios, that I should be born of a house that rules and governs the world in my time; but further, I regard this god, if we may believe the wise, as the common father of all mankind.623 For it is said with truth that man and the sun together beget man, and that the god sows this earth with souls which proceed not from himself alone but from the other gods also; and for what purpose, the souls reveal by the kind of lives that they select. Now far the best thing is when anyone has the fortune to have inherited the service of the god, even before the third generation, from a long and unbroken line of ancestors; yet it is not a thing to be disparaged when anyone, recognising that he is by nature intended to be the servant of Helios, either alone of all men, or in company with but few, devotes himself to the service of his master.

    Come then, let me celebrate, as best I may, his festival which the Imperial city626 adorns with annual sacrifices.627 Now it is hard, as I well know, merely to comprehend how great is the Invisible, if one judge by his visible self,628 and to tell it is perhaps impossible, even though one should consent to fall short of what is his due. For well I know that no one in the world could attain to a description that would be worthy of him, and not to fail of a certain measure of success in his praises is the greatest height to which human beings can attain in the power of utterance. But as for me, may Hermes, the god of eloquence, stand by my side to aid me, and the Muses also and Apollo, the leader of the Muses, since he too has oratory for his province, and may they grant that I utter only what the gods approve that men should say and believe about them. What, then, shall be the manner of my praise? Or is it not evident that if I describe his substance and his origin, and his powers and energies, both visible and invisible, and the gift of blessings which he bestows throughout all the worlds,629 I shall compose an encomium not wholly displeasing to the god? With these, then, let me begin.

    This divine and wholly beautiful universe, from the highest vault of heaven to the lowest limit of the earth, is held together by the continuous providence of the god, has existed from eternity ungenerated, is imperishable for all time to come, and is guarded immediately by nothing else than the Fifth Substance634 whose culmination is the beams of the sun; and in the second and higher degree, so to speak, by the intelligible world; but in a still loftier sense it is guarded by the King of the whole universe, who is the centre of all things that exist. He, therefore, whether it is right to call him the Supra-Intelligible, or the Idea of Being, and by Being I mean the whole intelligible region, or the One, since the One seems somehow to be prior to all the rest, or, to use Plato’s name for him, the Good; at any rate this uncompounded cause of the whole reveals to all existence beauty, and perfection, and oneness, and irresistible power; and in virtue of the primal creative substance that abides in it, produced, as middle among the middle and intellectual, creative causes, Helios the most mighty god, proceeding from itself and in all things like unto itself. Even so the divine Plato believed, when he writes, “Therefore (said I) when I spoke of this, understand that I meant the offspring of the Good which the Good begat in his own likeness, and that what the Good is in relation to pure reason and its objects in the intelligible world, such is the sun in the visible world in relation to sight and its objects.” Accordingly his light has the same relation to the visible world as truth has to the intelligible world. And he himself as a whole, since he is the son of what is first and greatest, namely, the Idea of the Good, and subsists from eternity in the region of its abiding substance, has received also the dominion among the intellectual gods, and himself dispenses to the intellectual gods those things of which the Good is the cause for the intelligible gods. Now the Good is, I suppose, the cause for the intelligible gods of beauty, existence, perfection, and oneness, connecting these and illuminating them with a power that works for good. These accordingly Helios bestows on the intellectual gods also, since he has been appointed by the Good to rule and govern them, even though they came forth and came into being together with him, and this was, I suppose, in order that the cause which resembles the Good may guide the intellectual gods to blessings for them all, and may regulate all things according to pure reason.

    But this visible disc also, third640 in rank, is clearly, for the objects of sense-perception the cause of preservation, and this visible Helios641 is the cause for the visible gods642 of just as many blessings as we said mighty Helios bestows on the intellectual gods. And of this there are clear proofs for one who studies the unseen world in the light of things seen. For in the first place, is not light itself a sort of incorporeal and divine form of the transparent in a state of activity? And as for the transparent itself, whatever it is, since it is the underlying basis, so to speak, of all the elements, and is a form peculiarly belonging to them, it is not like the corporeal or compounded, nor does it admit qualities peculiar to corporeal substance.643 You will not therefore say that heat is a property of the transparent, or its opposite cold, nor will you assign to it hardness or softness or any other of the various attributes connected with touch or taste or smell; but a nature of this sort is obvious to sight alone, since it is brought into activity by light. And light is a form of this substance, so to speak, which is the substratum of and coextensive with the heavenly bodies. And of light, itself incorporeal, the culmination and flower, so to speak, is the sun’s rays. Now the doctrine of the Phoenicians, who were wise and learned in sacred lore, declared that the rays of light everywhere diffused are the undefiled incarnation of pure mind. And in harmony with this is our theory, seeing that light itself is incorporeal, if one should regard its fountainhead, not as corporeal, but as the undefiled activity of mind644 pouring light into its own abode: and this is assigned to the middle of the whole firmament, whence it sheds its rays and fills the heavenly spheres with vigour of every kind and illumines all things with light divine and undefiled. Now the activities proceeding from it and exercised among the gods have been, in some measure at least, described by me a little earlier and will shortly be further spoken of. But all that we see merely with the sight at first is a name only, deprived of activity, unless we add thereto the guidance and aid of light. For what, speaking generally, could be seen, were it not first brought into touch with light in order that, I suppose, it may receive a form, as matter is brought under the hand of a craftsman? And indeed molten gold in the rough is simply gold, and not yet a statue or an image, until the craftsman give it its proper shape. So too all the objects of sight, unless they are brought under the eyes of the beholder together with light, are altogether deprived of visibility. Accordingly by giving the power of sight to those who see, and the power of being seen to the objects of sight, it brings to perfection, by means of a single activity, two faculties, namely vision and visibility.645 And in forms and substance are expressed its perfecting powers.

    However, this is perhaps somewhat subtle; but as for that guide whom we all follow, ignorant and unlearned, philosophers and rhetoricians, what power in the universe has this god when he rises and sets? Night and day he creates, and before our eyes changes and sways the universe. But to which of the other heavenly bodies does this power belong? How then can we now fail to believe, in view of this, in respect also to things more divine that the invisible and divine tribes of intellectual gods above the heavens are filled with power that works for good by him, even by him to whom the whole band of the heavenly bodies yields place, and whom all generated things follow, piloted by his providence? For that the planets dance about him as their king, in certain intervals, fixed in relation to him, and revolve in a circle with perfect accord, making certain halts, and pursuing to and fro their orbit,647 as those who are learned in the study of the spheres call their visible motions; and that the light of the moon waxes and wanes varying in proportion to its distance from the sun, is, I think, clear to all. Then is it not natural that we should suppose that the more venerable ordering of bodies among the intellectual gods corresponds to this arrangement?

    Let us therefore comprehend, out of all his functions, first his power to perfect, from the fact that he makes visible the objects of sight in the universe, for through his light he perfects them; secondly, his creative and generative power from the changes wrought by him in the universe; thirdly, his power to link together all things into one whole, from the harmony of his motions towards one and the same goal; fourthly, his middle station we can comprehend from himself, who is midmost; and fifthly, the fact that he is established as king among the intellectual gods, from his middle station among the planets. Now if we see that these powers, or powers of similar importance, belong to any one of the other visible deities, let us not assign to Helios leadership among the gods. But if he has nothing in common with those other gods except his beneficent energy, and of this too he gives them all a share, then let us call to witness the priests of Cyprus who set up common altars to Helios and Zeus; but even before them let us summon as witness Apollo, who sits in council with our god. For this god declares: “Zeus, Hades, Helios Serapis, three gods in one godhead!”657 Let us then assume that, among the intellectual gods, Helios and Zeus have a joint or rather a single sovereignty. Hence I think that with reason Plato called Hades a wise god.658 And we call this same god Hades Serapis also, namely the Unseen659 and Intellectual, to whom Plato says the souls of those who have lived most righteously and justly mount upwards. For let no one conceive of him as the god whom the legends teach us to shudder at, but as the mild and placable, since he completely frees our souls from generation: and the souls that he has thus freed he does not nail to other bodies, punishing them and exacting penalties, but he carries aloft and lifts up our souls to the intelligible world. And that this doctrine is not wholly new, but that Homer and Hesiod the most venerable of the poets held it before us, whether this was their own view or, like seers, they were divinely inspired with a sacred frenzy for the truth, is evident from the following. Hesiod, in tracing his genealogy, said660 that Helios is the son of Hyperion and Thea, intimating thereby that he is the true son of him who is above all things. For who else could Hyperion661 be? And is not Thea herself, in another fashion, said to be most divine of beings? But as for a union or marriage, let us not conceive of such a thing, since that is the incredible and paradoxical trifling of the poetic Muse. But let us believe that his father and sire was the most divine and supreme being; and who else could have this nature save him who transcends all things, the central point and goal of all things that exist? And Homer calls him Hyperion after his father and shows his unconditioned nature, superior to all constraint. For Zeus, as Homer says, since he is lord of all constrains the other gods. And when, in the course of the myth, Helios says that on account of the impiety of the comrades of Odysseus662 he will forsake Olympus, Zeus no longer says, “Then with very earth would I draw you up and the sea withal,”6nor does he threaten him with fetters or violence, but he says that he will inflict punishment on the guilty and bids Helios go on shining among the gods. Does he not thereby declare that besides being unconditioned, Helios has also the power to perfect? For why do the gods need him unless by sending his light, himself invisible, on their substance and existence, he fulfils for them the blessings of which I spoke? For when Homer says that “Ox-eyed Hera, the queen, sent unwearied Helios to go, all unwilling, to the streams of Oceanus,” he means that, by reason of a heavy mist, it was thought to be night before the proper time. And this mist is surely the goddess herself, and in another place also in the poem he says, “Hera spread before them a thick mist.” But let us leave the stories of the poets alone. For along with what is inspired they contain much also that is merely human. And let me now relate what the god himself seems to teach us, both about himself and the other gods.

    The region of the earth contains being in a state of becoming. Then who endows it with imperishability? Is it not he666 who keeps it all together by means of definite limits? For that the nature of being should be unlimited was not possible, since it is neither uncreated nor self-subsistent. And if from being something were generated absolutely without ceasing and nothing were resolved back into it, the substance of things generated would fail. Accordingly this god, moving in due measure, raises up and stimulates this substance when he approaches it, and when he departs to a distance he diminishes and destroys it; or rather he himself continually revivifies it by giving it movement and flooding it with life. And his departure and turning in the other direction is the cause of decay for things that perish. Ever does his gift of blessings descend evenly upon the earth. For now one country now another receives them, to the end that becoming may not cease nor the god ever benefit less or more than is his custom this changeful world. For sameness, as of being so also of activity, exists among the gods, and above all the others in the case of the King of the All, Helios; and he also makes the simplest movement of all the heavenly bodies667 that travel in a direction opposite to the whole. In fact this is the very thing that the celebrated Aristotle makes a proof of his superiority, compared with the others. Nevertheless from the other intellectual gods also, forces clearly discernible descend to this world. And now what does this mean? Are we not excluding the others when we assert that the leadership has been assigned to Helios? Nay, far rather do I think it right from the visible to have faith about the invisible.668 For even as this god is seen to complete and to adapt to himself and to the universe the powers that are bestowed on the earth from the other gods for all things, after the same fashion we must believe that among the invisible gods also there is intercourse with one another; his mode of intercourse being that of a leader, while the modes of intercourse of the others are at the same time in harmony with his. For since we said that the god is established midmost among the midmost intellectual gods, may King Helios himself grant to us to tell what is the nature of that middleness among things of which we must regard him as the middle.

    Now “middleness”670 we define not as that mean which in opposites is seen to be equally remote from the extremes, as, for instance, in colours, tawny or dusky, and warm in the case of hot and cold, and the like, but that which unifies and links together what is separate; for instance the sort of thing that Empedocles671 means by Harmony when from it he altogether eliminates Strife. And now what does Helios link together, and of what is he the middle? I assert then that he is midway between the visible gods who surround the universe and the immaterial and intelligible gods who surround the Good—for the intelligible and divine substance is as it were multiplied without external influence and without addition. For that the intellectual and wholly beautiful substance of King Helios is middle in the sense of being unmixed with extremes, complete in itself, and distinct from the whole number of the gods, visible and invisible, both those perceptible by sense and those which are intelligible only, I have already declared, and also in what sense we must conceive of his middleness. But if I must also describe these things one by one, in order that we may discern with our intelligence how his intermediary nature, in its various forms, is related both to the highest and the lowest, even though it is not easy to recount it all, yet let me try to say what can be said. Wholly one is the intelligible world, pre-existent from all time, and it combines all things together in the One. Again is not our whole world also one complete living organism, wholly throughout the whole of it full of soul and intelligence, “perfect, with all its parts perfect”? Midway then between this uniform two-fold perfection—I mean that one kind of unity holds together in one all that exists in the intelligible world, while the other kind of unity unites in the visible world all things into one and the same perfect nature—between these, I say, is the uniform perfection of King Helios, established among the intellectual gods. There is, however, next in order, a sort of binding force in the intelligible world of the gods, which orders all things into one. Again is there not visible in the heavens also, travelling in its orbit, the nature of the Fifth Substance, which links and compresses676 together all the parts, holding together things that by nature are prone to scatter and to fall away from one another? These existences, therefore, which are two causes of connection, one in the intelligible world, while the other appears in the world of sense-perception, King Helios combines into one, imitating the synthetic power of the former among the intellectual gods, seeing that he proceeds from it, and subsisting prior to the latter which is seen in the visible world. Then must not the unconditioned also, which exists primarily in the intelligible world, and finally among the visible bodies in the heavens, possess midway between these two the unconditioned substance of King Helios, and from that primary creative substance do not the rays of his light, illumining all things, descend to the visible world? Again, to take another point of view, the creator of the whole is one, but many are the creative gods677 who revolve in the heavens. Midmost therefore of these also we must place the creative activity which descends into the world from Helios. But also the power of generating life is abundant and overflowing in the intelligible world; and our world also appears to be full of generative life. It is therefore evident that the life-generating power of King Helios also is midway between both the worlds: and the phenomena of our world also bear witness to this. For some forms he perfects, others he makes, or adorns, or wakes to life, and there is no single thing which, apart from the creative power derived from Helios, can come to light and to birth. And further, besides this, if we should comprehend the pure and undefiled and immaterial substance678 among the intelligible gods—to which nothing external is added, nor has any alien thing a place therein, but it is filled with its own unstained purity—and if we should comprehend also the pure and unmixed nature of unstained and divine substance, whose elements are wholly unmixed, and which, in the visible universe, surrounds the substance that revolves,679 here also we should discover the radiant and stainless substance of King Helios, midway between the two; that is to say, midway between the immaterial purity that exists among the intelligible gods, and that perfect purity, unstained and free from birth and death, that exists in the world which we can perceive. And the greatest proof of this is that not even the light which comes down nearest to the earth from the sun is mixed with anything, nor does it admit dirt and defilement, but remains wholly pure and without stain and free from external influences among all existing things. But we must go on to consider the immaterial and intelligible forms,680 and also those visible forms which are united with matter or the substratum. Here again, the intellectual will be found to be midmost among the forms that surround mighty Helios, by which forms in their turn the material forms are aided; for they never could have existed or been preserved, had they not been brought, by his aid, into connection with being. For consider: is not he the cause of the separation of the forms, and of the combination of matter, in that he not only permits us to comprehend his very self, but also to behold him with our eyes? For the distribution of his rays over the whole universe, and the unifying power of his light, prove him to be the master workman who gives an individual existence to everything that is created. Now though there are many more blessings connected with the substance of the god and apparent to us, which show that he is midway between the intelligible and the mundane gods682 let us proceed to his last visible province. His first province then in the last of the worlds is, as though by way of a pattern, to give form and personality to the sun’s angels.683 Next is his province of generating the world of sense-perception, of which the more honourable part contains the cause of the heavens and the heavenly bodies, while the inferior part guides this our world of becoming, and from eternity contains in itself the uncreated cause of that world. Now to describe all the properties of the substance of this god, even though the god himself should grant one to comprehend them, is impossible, seeing that even to grasp them all with the mind is, in my opinion, beyond our power.

    But since I have already described many of them, I must set a seal, as it were, on this discourse, now that I am about to pass to other subjects that demand no less investigation. What then that seal is, and what is the knowledge of the god’s substance that embraces all these questions, and as it were sums them up under one head, may he himself suggest to my mind, since I desire to describe in a brief summary both the cause from which he proceeded, and his own nature, and those blessings with which he fills the visible world. This then we must declare, that King Helios is One and proceeds from one god, even from the intelligible world which is itself One; and that he is midmost of the intellectual gods, stationed in their midst by every kind of mediateness that is harmonious and friendly, and that joins what is sundered; and that he brings together into one the last and the first, having in his own person the means of completeness, of connection, of generative life and of uniform being: and that for the world which we can perceive he initiates blessings of all sorts, not only by means of the light with which he illumines it, adorning it and giving it its splendour, but also because he calls into existence, along with himself, the substance of the Sun’s angels; and that finally in himself he comprehends the ungenerated cause of things generated, and further, and prior to this, the ageless and abiding cause of the life of the imperishable bodies.

    Now as for what it was right to say about the substance of this god, though the greater part has been omitted, nevertheless much has been said. But since the multitude of his powers and the beauty of his activities is so great that we shall now exceed the limit of what we observed about his substance,—for it is natural that when divine things come forth into the region of the visible they should be multiplied, in virtue of the superabundance of life and life-generating power in them,—consider what I have to do. For now I must strip for a plunge into this fathomless sea, though I have barely, and as best I might, taken breath, after the first part of this discourse. Venture I must, nevertheless, and putting my trust in the god endeavour to handle the theme. We must assume that what has just been said about his substance applies equally to his powers.689 For it cannot be that a god’s substance is one thing, and his power another, and his activity, by Zeus, a third thing besides these. For all that he wills he is, and can do, and puts into action. For he does not will what is not, nor does he lack power to do what he wills, nor does he desire to put into action what he cannot. In the case of a human being, however, this is otherwise. For his is a two-fold contending nature of soul and body compounded into one, the former divine, the latter dark and clouded. Naturally, therefore, there is a battle and a feud between them. And Aristotle also says that this is why neither the pleasures nor the pains in us harmonise with one another. For he says that what is pleasant to one of the natures within us is painful to the nature which is its opposite. But among the gods there is nothing of this sort. For from their very nature what is good belongs to them, and perpetually, not intermittently. In the first place, then, all that I said when I tried to show forth his substance, I must be considered to have said about his powers and activities also. And since in such cases the argument is naturally convertible, all that I observe next in order concerning his powers and activities must be considered to apply not to his activities only, but to his substance also. For verily there are gods related to Helios and of like substance who sum up the stainless nature of this god, and though in the visible world they are plural, in him they are one. And now listen first to what they assert who look at the heavens, not like horses and cattle, or some other unreasoning and ignorant animal,690 but from it draw their conclusions about the unseen world. But even before this, if you please, consider his supra-mundane powers and activities, and out of a countless number, observe but a few. First, then, of his powers is that through which he reveals the whole intellectual substance throughout as one, since he brings together its extremes. For even as in the world of sense-perception we can clearly discern air and water set between fire and earth,693 as the link that binds together the extremes, would one not reasonably suppose that, in the case of the cause which is separate from elements and prior to them—and though it is the principle of generation, is not itself generation—it is so ordered that, in that world also, the extreme causes which are wholly separate from elements are bound together into one through certain modes of mediation, by King Helios, and are united about him as their centre? And the creative power of Zeus also coincides with him, by reason of which in Cyprus, as I said earlier, shrines are founded and assigned to them in common. And Apollo himself also we called to witness to our statements, since it is certainly likely that he knows better than we about his own nature. For he too abides with Helios and is his colleague by reason of the singleness of his thoughts and the stability of his substance and the consistency of his activity. But Apollo too in no case appears to separate the dividing creative function of Dionysus694 from Helios. And since he always subordinates it to Helios and so indicates that Dionysus695 is his partner on the throne, Apollo is the interpreter for us of the fairest purposes that are to be found with our god. Further Helios, since he comprehends in himself all the principles of the fairest intellectual synthesis, is himself Apollo the leader of the Muses. And since he fills the whole of our life with fair order, he begat Asclepios696 in the world, though even before the beginning of the world he had him by his side. But though one should survey many other powers that belong to this god, never could one investigate them all. It is enough to have observed the following: That there is an equal and identical dominion of Helios and Zeus over the separate creation which is prior to substances, in the region, that is to say, of the absolute causes which, separated from visible creation, existed prior to it; secondly we observed the singleness of his thoughts which is bound up with the imperishableness and abiding sameness that he shares with Apollo; thirdly, the dividing part of his creative function which he shares with Dionysus who controls divided substance; fourthly we have observed the power of the leader of the Muses, revealed in fairest symmetry and blending of the intellectual; finally we comprehended that Helios, with Asclepios, fulfils the fair order of the whole of life. So much then in respect to those powers of his that existed before the beginning of the world; and co-ordinate with these are his works over the whole visible world, in that he fills it with good gifts. For since he is the genuine son of the Good and from it has received his blessed lot in fulness of perfection, he himself distributes that blessedness to the intellectual gods, bestowing on them a beneficent and perfect nature. This then is one of his works. And a second work of the god is his most perfect distribution of intelligible beauty among the intellectual and immaterial forms. For when the generative substance700 which is visible in our world desires to beget in the Beautiful701 and to bring forth offspring, it is further necessary that it should be guided by the substance that, in the region of intelligible beauty, does this very thing eternally and always and not intermittently, now fruitful now barren. For all that is beautiful in our world only at times, is beautiful always in the intelligible world. We must therefore assert that the ungenerated offspring in beauty intelligible and eternal guides the generative cause in the visible world; which offspring702 this god703 called into existence and keeps at his side, and to it he assigns also perfect reason. For just as through his light he gives sight to our eyes, so also among the intelligible gods through his intellectual counterpart—which he causes to shine far more brightly than his rays in our upper air—he bestows, as I believe, on all the intellectual gods the faculty of thought and of being comprehended by thought. Besides these, another marvellous activity of Helios the King of the All is that by which he endows with superior lot the nobler races—I mean angels, daemons,704 heroes, and those divided souls705 which remain in the category of model and archetype and never give themselves over to bodies. I have now described the substance of our god that is prior to the world and his powers and activities, celebrating Helios the King of the All in so far as it was possible for me to compass his praise. But since eyes, as the saying goes, are more trustworthy than hearing—although they are of course less trustworthy and weaker than the intelligence—come, let me endeavour to tell also of his visible creative function; but let first me entreat him to grant that I speak with some measure of success. From eternity there subsisted, surrounding Helios, the visible world, and from eternity the light that encompasses the world has its fixed station, not shining intermittently, nor in different ways at different times, but always in the same manner. And if one desired to comprehend, as far as the mind may, this eternal nature from the point of view of time, one would understand most easily of how many blessings for the world throughout eternity he is the cause, even Helios the King of the All who shines without cessation. Now I am aware that the great philosopher Plato,708 and after him a man who, though he is later in time, is by no means inferior to him in genius—I mean Iamblichus709 of Chalcis, who through his writings initiated me not only into other philosophic doctrines but these also—I am aware, I say, that they employed as a hypothesis the conception of a generated world, and assumed for it, so to speak, a creation in time in order that the magnitude of the works that arise from Helios might be recognised. But apart from the fact that I fall short altogether of their ability, I must by no means be so rash; especially since the glorious hero Iamblichus thought it was not without risk to assume, even as a bare hypothesis, a temporal limit for the creation of the world. Nay rather, the god came forth from an eternal cause, or rather brought forth all things from everlasting, engendering by his divine will and with untold speed and unsurpassed power, from the invisible all things now visible in present time. And then he assigned as his own station the mid-heavens, in order that from all sides he may bestow equal blessings on the gods who came forth by his agency and in company with him; and that he may guide the seven spheres710 in the heavens and the eighth sphere711 also, yes and as I believe the ninth creation too, namely our world which revolves for ever in a continuous cycle of birth and death. For it is evident that the planets, as they dance in a circle about him, preserve as the measure of their motion a harmony between this god and their own movements such as I shall now describe; and that the whole heaven also, which adapts itself to him in all its parts, is full of gods who proceed from Helios. For this god is lord of five zones in the heavens; and when he traverses three of these he begets in those three the three Graces.712 And the remaining zones are the scales of mighty Necessity.713 To the Greeks what I say is perhaps incomprehensible—as though one were obliged to say to them only what is known and familiar. Yet not even is this altogether strange to them as one might suppose. For who, then, in your opinion, are the Dioscuri,714 O ye most wise, ye who accept without question so many of your traditions? Do you not call them “alternate of days,” because they may not both be seen on the same day? It is obvious that by this you mean “yesterday” and “to-day.” But what does this mean, in the name of those same Dioscuri? Let me apply it to some natural object, so that I may not say anything empty and senseless. But no such object could one find, however carefully one might search for it. For the theory that some have supposed to be held by the theogonists, that the two hemispheres of the universe are meant, has no meaning. For how one could call each one of the hemispheres “alternate of days” is not easy to imagine, since the increase of their light in each separate day is imperceptible. But now let us consider a question on which some may think that I am innovating. We say correctly that those persons for whom the time of the sun’s course above the earth is the same in one and the same month share the same day. Consider therefore whether the expression “alternate of days” cannot be applied both to the tropics and the other, the polar, circles. But some one will object that it does not apply equally to both. For though the former are always visible, and both of them are visible at once to those who inhabit that part of the earth where shadows are cast in an opposite direction,715 yet in the case of the latter those who see the one do not see the other. However, not to dwell too long on the same subject; since he causes the winter and summer solstice, Helios is, as we know, the father of the seasons; and since he never forsakes the poles, he is Oceanus, the lord of two-fold substance. My meaning here is not obscure, is it, seeing that before my time Homer said the same thing “Oceanus who is the father of all things” yes, for mortals and for the blessed gods too, as he himself would say; and what he says is true. For there is no single thing in the whole of existence that is not the offspring of the substance of Oceanus. But what has that to do with the poles? Shall I tell you? It were better indeed to keep silence717; but for all that I will speak. Some say then, even though all men are not ready to believe it, that the sun travels in the starless heavens far above the region of the fixed stars. And on this theory he will not be stationed midmost among the planets but midway between the three worlds: that is, according to the hypothesis of the mysteries, if indeed one ought to use the word “hypothesis” and not rather say “established truths,” using the word “hypothesis” for the study of the heavenly bodies. For the priests of the mysteries tell us what they have been taught by the gods or mighty daemons, whereas the astronomers make plausible hypotheses from the harmony that they observe in the visible spheres. It is proper, no doubt, to approve the astronomers as well, but where any man thinks it better to believe the priests of the mysteries, him I admire and revere, both in jest and earnest. And so much for that, as the saying is. Now besides those whom I have mentioned, there is in the heavens a great multitude of gods who have been recognised as such by those who survey the heavens, not casually, nor like cattle. For as he divides the three spheres by four through the zodiac,724 which is associated with every one of the three, so he divides the zodiac also into twelve divine powers; and again he divides every one of these twelve by three, so as to make thirty-six gods in725 all. Hence, as I believe, there descends from above, from the heavens to us, a three-fold gift of the Graces: I mean from the spheres, for this god, by thus dividing them by four, sends to us the fourfold glory of the seasons, which express the changes of time. And indeed on our earth the Graces imitate a circle726 in their statues. And it is Dionysus who is the giver of the Graces, and in this very connection he is said to reign with Helios. Why should I go on to speak to you of Horus727 and of the other names of gods, which all belong to Helios? For from his works men have learned to know this god, who makes the whole heavens perfect through the gift of intellectual blessings, and gives it a share of intelligible beauty; and taking the heavens as their starting-point, they have learned to know him both as a whole and his parts also, from his abundant bestowal of good gifts. For he exercises control over all movement, even to the lowest plane of the universe. And everywhere he makes all things perfect, nature and soul and everything that exists. And marshalling together this great army of the gods into a single commanding unity, he handed it over to Athene Pronoia728 who, as the legend says, sprang from the head of Zeus, but I say that she was sent forth from Helios whole from the whole of him, being contained within him; though I disagree with the legend only so far as I assert that she came forth not from his highest part, but whole from the whole of him. For in other respects, since I believe that Zeus is in no wise different from Helios, I agree with that ancient tradition. And in using this very phrase Athene Pronoia, I am not innovating, if I rightly understand the words: “He came to Pytho and to grey-eyed Pronoia.” This proves that the ancients also thought that Athene Pronoia shared the throne of Apollo, who, as we believe, differs in no way from Helios. Indeed, did not Homer by divine inspiration—for he was, we may suppose, possessed by a god—reveal this truth, when he says often in his poems: “May I be honoured even as Athene and Apollo were honoured”—by Zeus, that is to say, who is identical with Helios? And just as King Apollo, through the singleness of his thoughts, is associated with Helios, so also we must believe that Athene735 has received her nature from Helios, and that she is his intelligence in perfect form: and so she binds together the gods who are assembled about Helios and brings them without confusion into unity with Helios, the King of the All: and she distributes and is the channel for stainless and pure life throughout the seven spheres, from the highest vault of the heavens as far as Selene the Moon:736 for Selene is the last of the heavenly spheres which Athene fills with wisdom: and by her aid Selene beholds the intelligible which is higher than the heavens, and adorns with its forms the realm of matter that lies below her, and thus she does away with its savagery and confusion and disorder. Moreover to mankind Athene gives the blessings of wisdom and intelligence and the creative arts. And surely she dwells in the capitols of cities because, through her wisdom, she has established the community of the state. I have still to say a few words about Aphrodite, who, as the wise men among the Phoenicians affirm, and as I believe, assists Helios in his creative function. She is, in very truth, a synthesis of the heavenly gods, and in their harmony she is the spirit of love and unity.737 For she738 is very near to Helios, and when she pursues the same course as he and approaches him, she fills the skies with fair weather and gives generative power to the earth: for she herself takes thought for the continuous birth of living things. And though of that continuous birth King Helios is the primary creative cause, yet Aphrodite is the joint cause with him, she who enchants our souls with her charm and sends down to earth from the upper air rays of light most sweet and stainless, aye, more lustrous than gold itself. I desire to mete out to you still more of the theology of the Phoenicians, and whether it be to some purpose my argument as it proceeds will show. The inhabitants of Emesa,739 a place from time immemorial sacred to Helios, associate with Helios in their temples Monimos and Azizos.740 Iamblichus, from whom I have taken this and all besides, a little from a great store, says that the secret meaning to be interpreted is that Monimos is Hermes and Azizos Ares, the assessors of Helios, who are the channel for many blessings to the region of our earth.

    Such then are the works of Helios in the heavens, and, when completed by means of the gods whom I have named, they reach even unto the furthest bounds of the earth. But to tell the number of all his works in the region below the moon would take too long. Nevertheless I must describe them also in a brief summary. Now I am aware that I mentioned them earlier when I claimed741 that from things visible we could observe the invisible properties of the god’s substance, but the argument demands that I should expound them now also, in their proper order.I said then that Helios holds sway among the intellectual gods in that he unites into one, about his own undivided substance, a great multitude of the gods: and further, I demonstrated that among the gods whom we can perceive, who revolve eternally in their most blessed path, he is leader and lord; since he bestows on their nature its generative power, and fills the whole heavens not only with visible rays of light but with countless other blessings that are invisible; and, further, that the blessings which are abundantly supplied by the other visible gods are made perfect by him, and that even prior to this the visible gods themselves are made perfect by his unspeakable and divine activity. In the same manner we must believe that on this our world of generation certain gods have alighted who are linked together with Helios: and these gods guide the four-fold nature of the elements, and inhabit, together with the three higher races,744 those souls which are upborne by the elements. But for the divided souls745 also, of how many blessings is he the cause! For he extends to them the faculty of judging, and guides them with justice, and purifies them by his brilliant light. Again, does he not set in motion the whole of nature and kindle life therein, by bestowing on it generative power from on high? But for the divided natures also, is not he the cause that they journey to their appointed end?746 For Aristotle says that man is begotten by man and the sun together. Accordingly the same theory about King Helios must surely apply to all the other activities of the divided souls. Again, does he not produce for us rain and wind and the clouds in the skies, by employing, as though it were matter, the two kinds of vapour? For when he heats the earth he draws up steam and smoke, and from these there arise not only the clouds but also all the physical changes on our earth, both great and small. But why do I deal with the same questions at such length, when I am free at last to come to my goal, though not till I have first celebrated all the blessings that Helios has given to mankind? For from him are we born, and by him are we nourished. But his more divine gifts, and all that he bestows on our souls when he frees them from the body and then lifts them up on high to the region of those substances that are akin to the god; and the fineness and vigour of his divine rays, which are assigned as a sort of vehicle for the safe descent of our souls into this world of generation; all this, I say, let others celebrate in fitting strains, but let me believe it rather than demonstrate its truth. However, I need not hesitate to discuss so much as is known to all. Plato says that the sky is our instructor in wisdom. For from its contemplation we have learned to know the nature of number, whose distinguishing characteristics we know only from the course of the sun. Plato himself says that day and night were created first.750 And next, from observing the moon’s light, which was bestowed on the goddess by Helios, we later progressed still further in the understanding of these matters: in every case conjecturing the harmony of all things with this god. For Plato himself says somewhere that our race was by nature doomed to toil, and so the gods pitied us and gave us Dionysus and the Muses as playfellows. And we recognised that Helios is their common lord, since he is celebrated as the father of Dionysus and the leader of the Muses. And has not Apollo, who is his colleague in empire, set up oracles in every part of the earth, and given to men inspired wisdom, and regulated their cities by means of religious and political ordinances? And he has civilised the greater part of the world by means of Greek colonies, and so made it easier for the world to be governed by the Romans. For the Romans themselves not only belong to the Greek race, but also the sacred ordinances and the pious belief in the gods which they have established and maintain are, from beginning to end, Greek. And beside this they have established a constitution not inferior to that of any one of the best governed states, if indeed it be not superior to all others that have ever been put into practice. For which reason I myself recognise that our city is Greek, both in descent and as to its constitution. Shall I now go on to tell you how Helios took thought for the health and safety of all men by begetting Asclepios752 to be the saviour of the whole world? and how he bestowed on us every kind of excellence by sending down to us Aphrodite together with Athene, and thus laid down for our protection what is almost a law, that we should only unite to beget our kind? Surely it is for this reason that, in agreement with the course of the sun, all plants and all the tribes of living things are aroused to bring forth their kind. What need is there for me to glorify his beams and his light? For surely everyone knows how terrible is night without a moon or stars, so that from this he can calculate how great a boon for us is the light of the sun? And this very light he supplies at night, without ceasing, and directly, from the moon in those upper spaces where it is needed, while he grants us through the night a truce from toil. But there would be no limit to the account if one should endeavour to describe all his gifts of this sort. For there is no single blessing in our lives which we do not receive as a gift from this god, either perfect from him alone, or, through the other gods, perfected by him. Moreover he is the founder of our city.755 For not only does Zeus, who is glorified as the father of all things, inhabit its citadel756 together with Athene and Aphrodite, but Apollo also dwells on the Palatine Hill, and Helios himself under this name of his which is commonly known to all and familiar to all. And I could say much to prove that we, the sons of Romulus and Aeneas, are in every way and in all respects connected with him, but I will mention briefly only what is most familiar. According to the legend, Aeneas is the son of Aphrodite, who is subordinate to Helios and is his kinswoman. And the tradition has been handed down that the founder of our city was the son of Ares, and the paradoxical element in the tale has been believed because of the portents which later appeared to support it. For a she-wolf, they say, gave him suck. Now I am aware that Ares, who is called Azizos by the Syrians who inhabit Emesa, precedes Helios in the sacred procession, but I mentioned it before, so I think I may let that pass. But why is the wolf sacred only to Ares and not to Helios? Yet men call the period of a year “lycabas,”757 which is derived from “wolf.” And not only Homer758 and the famous men of Greece call it by this name, but also the god himself, when he says: “With dancing does he bring to a close his journey of twelve months, even the lycabas.” Now do you wish me to bring forward a still greater proof that the founder of our city was sent down to earth, not by Ares alone, though perhaps some noble daemon with the character of Ares did take part in the fashioning of his mortal body, even he who is said to have visited Silvia760 when she was carrying water for the bath of the goddess,761 but the whole truth is that the soul of the god Quirinus762 came down to earth from Helios; for we must, I think, believe the sacred tradition. And the close conjunction of Helios and Selene, who share the empire over the visible world, even as it had caused his soul to descend to earth, in like manner caused to mount upwards him whom it received back from the earth, after blotting out with fire from a thunderbolt763 the mortal part of his body. So clearly did she who creates earthly matter, she whose place is at the furthest point below the sun, receive Quirinus when he was sent down to earth by Athene, goddess of Forethought; and when he took flight again from earth she led him back straightway to Helios, the King of the All. Do you wish me to mention yet another proof of this, I mean the work of King Numa?766 In Rome maiden priestesses767 guard the undying flame of the sun at different hours in turn; they guard the fire that is produced on earth by the agency of the god. And I can tell you a still greater proof of the power of this god, which is the work of that most divine king himself. The months are reckoned from the moon by, one may say, all other peoples; but we and the Egyptians alone reckon the days of every year according to the movements of the sun. If after this I should say that we also worship Mithras, and celebrate games in honour of Helios every four years, I shall be speaking of customs that are somewhat recent.768 But perhaps it is better to cite a proof from the remote past. The beginning of the cycle of the year is placed at different times by different peoples. Some place it at the spring equinox, others at the height of summer, and many in the late autumn; but they each and all sing the praises of the most visible gifts of Helios. One nation celebrates the season best adapted for work in the fields, when the earth bursts into bloom and exults, when all the crops are just beginning to sprout, and the sea begins to be safe for sailing; and the disagreeable, gloomy winter puts on a more cheerful aspect, others again award the crown to the summer season,769 since at that time they can safely feel confidence about the yield of the fruits, when the grains have already been harvested and midsummer is now at its height, and the fruits on the trees are ripening. Others again, with still more subtlety, regard as the close of the year the time when all the fruits are in their perfect prime and decay has already set in. For this reason they celebrate the annual festival of the New Year in late autumn. But our forefathers, from the time of the most divine king Numa, paid still greater reverence to the god Helios. They ignored the question of mere utility, I think, because they were naturally religious and endowed with unusual intelligence; but they saw that he is the cause of all that is useful, and so they ordered the observance of the New Year to correspond with the present season; that is to say when King Helios returns to us again, and leaving the region furthest south and, rounding Capricorn as though it were a goal-post, advances from the south to the north to give us our share of the blessings of the year. And that our forefathers, because they comprehended this correctly, thus established the beginning of the year, one may perceive from the following. For it was not, I think, the time when the god turns, but the time when he becomes visible to all men, as he travels from south to north, that they appointed for the festival. For still unknown to them was the nicety of those laws which the Chaldæans and Egyptians discovered, and which Hipparchus770 and Ptolemy771 perfected: but they judged simply by sense-perception, and were limited to what they could actually see. But the truth of these facts was recognised, as I said, by a later generation. Before the beginning of the year, at the end of the month which is called after Kronos,773 we celebrate in honour of Helios the most splendid games, and we dedicate the festival to the Invincible Sun. And after this it is not lawful to perform any of the shows that belong to the last month, gloomy as they are, though necessary. But, in the cycle, immediately after the end of the Kronia774 follow the Heliaia. That festival may the ruling gods grant me to praise and to celebrate with sacrifice! And above all the others may Helios himself, the King of the All, grant me this, even he who from eternity has proceeded from the generative substance of the Good: even he who is midmost of the midmost intellectual gods; who fills them with continuity and endless beauty and superabundance of generative power and perfect reason, yea with all blessings at once, and independently of time! And now he illumines his own visible abode, which from eternity moves as the centre of the whole heavens, and bestows a share of intelligible beauty on the whole visible world, and fills the whole heavens with the same number of gods as he contains in himself in intellectual form. And without division they reveal themselves in manifold form surrounding him, but they are attached to him to form a unity. Aye, but also, through his perpetual generation and the blessings that he bestows from the heavenly bodies, he holds together the region beneath the moon. For he cares for the whole human race in common, but especially for my own city,775 even as also he brought into being my soul from eternity, and made it his follower. All this, therefore, that I prayed for a moment ago, may he grant, and further may he, of his grace, endow my city as a whole with eternal existence, so far as is possible, and protect her; and for myself personally, may he grant that, so long as I am permitted to live, I may prosper in my affairs both human and divine; finally may he grant me to live and serve the state with my life, so long as is pleasing to himself and well for me and expedient for the Roman Empire! This discourse, friend Sallust,778 I composed in three nights at most, in harmony with the three-fold creative power of the god,779 as far as possible just as it occurred to my memory: and I have ventured to write it down and to dedicate it to you because you thought my earlier work on the Kronia780 was not wholly worthless. But if you wish to meet with a more complete and more mystical treatment of the same theme, then read the writings of the inspired Iamblichus on this subject,781 and you will find there the most consummate wisdom which man can achieve. And may mighty Helios grant that I too may attain to no less perfect knowledge of himself, and that I may instruct all men, speaking generally, but especially those who are worthy to learn. And so long as Helios grants let us all in common revere Iamblichus, the beloved of the gods. For he is the source for what I have here set down, a few thoughts from many, as they occurred to my mind. However I know well that no one can utter anything more perfect than he, nay not though he should labour long at the task and say very much that is new. For he will naturally diverge thereby from the truest knowledge of the god. Therefore it would probably have been a vain undertaking to compose anything after Iamblichus on the same subject if I had written this discourse for the sake of giving instruction. But since I wished to compose a hymn to express my gratitude to the god, I thought that this was the best place in which to tell, to the best of my power, of his essential nature. And so I think that not in vain has this discourse been composed. For the saying “To the extent of your powers offer sacrifice to the immortal gods,” I apply not to sacrifice only, but also to the praises that we offer to the gods. For the third time, therefore, I pray that Helios, the King of the All, may be gracious to me in recompense for this my zeal; and may he grant me a virtuous life and more perfect wisdom and inspired intelligence, and, when fate wills, the gentlest exit that may be from life, at a fitting hour; and that I may ascend to him thereafter and abide with him, for ever if possible, but if that be more than the actions of my life deserve, for many periods of many years! From – https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/48664/pg48664-images.html#note_668

    From The Works of The Emperor Julian, Vol. I, trans. Wilmer Cave Wright, Project Gutenberg e-book