A Blog

  • The ‘UK’ prepares for war

    This book, Early Armoured Cars by E. Bartholomew as Shire 209 Album, (Shire Books being a publishing list of true knowledge of Britain in context of history, geography, society, all things Logical and true, and which get purchased very fast off second hand book stands at archaeology conferences for that reason) was purchased by this writer from an Oxfam second hand bookshop between 55’N-56’N.

    Is a bicycle a car? No. The picture above does look more like a bicycle but there must be a tiny engine to be a car, though if it has pedals as looks like then it is a bicycle. Maybe it is a hybrid.

    Fast forward through decades going into a century = 100 years, and how has warfare changed? Flying military changed warfare horribly with the ability to drop a bomb from above after the ground level of millennia (yes millennia because warfare is as natural a part of life and death from possibly everything above amoeba level though at amoeba level there is no doubt some localised rivalry but we will never fully know and never fully get the data on that). Fast forward through the decades of developed amunitions, through nuclear bomb through western global politics (that’s the ‘west’ opinionating on global politics) and amunitions and nuclear and social media totally fused, not entwined but fused. Where is the ‘UK’ in this global state of affairs in now 2026?

    When it comes to actual physical fighting, which is what war is actually, sorry social media inhabitants but war is actually physical, how is the measurement within the ‘UK’ in the preparedness of its government for real war? The government itself, as in elected representatives, are not the ones who are under discussion for how does the ‘UK’ raise an army, it is amongst the mass of citizens from which an army will need to be raised, over and beyond the existing beleagered troops (beleagered by their own government now), and beyond the existing army it is proving very difficult to find a way of raising that army to equal the level of opinion on global matters which comes from the ‘UK’ government.

    So Logically, how different is the ‘UK’ level of defence from this picture of the bicycle/car/hybrid to February 2026?

  • The British Parliamentary system in a civil war

    Multi directional civil war, what happens next?

    2026 in UK politics and the wording is getting violent. The inewspaper 26.01.26 described the manoeverings between Andy Burnham and Sir Kier Starmer as civil war. The general definition of civil war is different factions within a jurisdiction fighting full on fight to seize power in opposite to one country fighting another in the modern nation state, and different to straightforward tribal warfare because the tribes form a different grouping by ethnicity and language even if in close geographical proximity and however subtle compared to the whole of human groupings on Earth (the spinning mass of rock with a tiny life zone around it, contained within the atmosphere and held in place by Helios). A civil war is amongst citizens within the same administration and used to be pure physical normal fighting, and not at all civil.

    The general tone of media and observation is that politics is getting more heated, more complicated, more personal, and with more at stake now with global definitions and actions instead of local or regional, and bigger and bigger projects like HS2 or strange projects like building a vast AI data centre, and the scale of the trouble is looming equally tall with more blame from party to party. Party to party warring talk could never be described as civil war because the different political parties form a different jurisdiction, no different to a state in that sense because the boundary is clear that one political party is not another, even if a politician changes party, the party definitions stay the same.

    It struck this writer a while ago when the Deputy Leader of the Labour party was up for vote, because that is already a division within the same and you would think that the leader of the Labour party would be wanting to appoint his or her deputy, or rather his, because there has not been a female leader of the Labour party to date (and possibly everything could descend into a fine emotional mess if there was). But the leader has to work closely with someone elected by another process other than leader perogative.

    A mayor of Manchester and a Prime Minister in the House of Commons in such heightened speculations and possible conflict if the present Mayor of Manchester does indeed want the throne, Parliamentary throne that is, is beginning to sound like the centuries olde way of doing business which was by power, physical action which produced a clear result, and which more closely resembles the natural world than the modern British political system. Use of the term civil war for the political system is reasonable – and reasonable in that sense is fair, relevant, apt. Trying to build a political administration on reasonableness is not really reasonable and it is all looking like something is about to unravel, not just within the Labour party but across the political groupings in the crumbling and leaking Palace of Westminster, House of Commons to you and me.

    Over the question of the Assisted Dying Bill, at present being held up by every possible toe and finger hold that the Lords and Ladies who are so personally against it can find, yet which has been voted through twice – twice – in the House of Commons for part of the ‘UK’ of England and Wales, that could also be seen as a civil war, one Parliamentary institution fighting another. And set against the strange assumption of power again by the House of Lords to state that the ‘UK’ must ban social media for young people, like Australia is doing, is an equal and opposite war against the Commons. If the House of Lords can set out to block a legislation where their only power it to work on it to get it passed, and at the same time set out their own statement that a law should be passed on social media, what does this say constitutionally? Do the House of Lords want to change places with those in the Commons? That is what civil war means, a fight for the top power of which only one person or party can hold.

    We have no written Constitution in the ‘UK’, no wish to return to pre the welfare state days or big State providing much of life, and no court of philosophy over and above all the state institutions. So if the system does fragment and a civil war between the Lords and Commons does bring down the credibility of the Commons, as seems the Lord intend over the hold up of the Assisted Dying Bill for Terminally Ill Adults, what on earth happens? The Earth will not change, but society in the ‘UK’ only references human made systems and such a situation has no framework for a governing system which collapses in on itself. One year on, just into 2027, what of governance in the ‘UK’? It is a really serious impasse.

  • Fighting at the final of the 2025 African Cup of Nations: it’s just not cricket

    So what is cricket? Everyone knows its the large green grass pitch, way larger than a hockey or football pitch, with the focus on bowler and batter in front of 3 little upright poles with one perched on top, and several fielders around the edge to run fast and get the ball before it hits the perimeter and scores 6, throw it back for team mates to try and get the batter out. The players wear white, the umpires wear a smart sort of coat and a brimmed hat and several of them because of the size of the pitch, and the spectators sit around the edge good humoured, often with a book in hand to read a few lines during the times of changeover of end, or the bowler making the long walk back to the start of another run, a little jump, arms circle around like a windmill, and the leather ball flies towards the batter, thwack, the batter’s wooden bat hits leather ball, and another brief burst of activity erupts, before repeat, eyes to book, and general peace and goodwill amongst all.

    For interest this writer looked up the history of cricket more specifically than just general knowledge and because of its distaste of cut and paste when IP is not clear, the website of the ICC gives a potted history of cricket as from the gentle Weald lands of SE England, and the fact of 1745 the first recorded Women’s Cricket, thereby negating the modern feminist narrative of being excluded from everything in the public realm. Men, ladies, umpires, regular spectators and the Barmy Army, only a tongue in cheek army, all formed a settled part of local and national life for a very long time and which ticked along very happily. It still does for some, but like everything slow and concentrated is not possible for the i-phone generation and who don’t read books, cricket is also falling to the one-day quick knock out, but so far the real full game over several days still exists and so still cricket is cricket in every sense of the word.

    https://www.icc-cricket.com/about/cricket/history-of-cricket/early-cricket

    If something is not cricket it could be any other sport like football or tennis or hockey, because cricket is only cricket, governed by the ICC, unless it is French cricket and that still is cricket-like but does not have, or need, any international governing body.

    If something is “just not cricket” then that’s a whole different thing altogether. It leaves the physical fact of a particular sport which like a national territory cannot be another territory, and goes into the realm of metaphor. It is not that one-day exciting cricket is just not cricket, it is not referring to cricket at all. And it could be referring to anything at all, that something is being done in a way which slightly demeans the original. What it actually means, this writer has just looked it up, Cambridge Dictionary, ‘it’s not fair, honest or moral,’ Wikipedia, ‘unsportsmanlike conduct in sports, business, or life in general,’ and Collins Dictionary, ‘unfair or unreasonable behaviour.’

    Scenes of fighting between just about everybody at the Rabat African Cup football final provide a very useful viewpoint onto the world of sport itself and the now global organisations. The Daily Mirror – link below to avoid any IP cut and paste – has some photos of what it describes as the crazy scenes, and lists 11 stages of the descent into chaos – the match descended into chaos, Senegal staged a dramatic walk-off, controversial refereeing decisions sparked fury, Sadio Mane acted as peacemaker, a missed penalty left a star in tears, Morocco used ‘dirty’ towel tactics (i.e. stealing), Pape Gueye secured the dramatic victory, press conferences collapsed as coaches clashed, clashes erupted in the stands, official condemnation from CAF and FIFA, illness outbreak decimated Senegal’s squad.

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/afcon-final-chaos-senegal-morocco-36575576

    It could be said that the African Cup of National 2025 final, played just into 2026, was “just not cricket.”

    If the scenes are taken according to an internationally accepted standard of football then a localised scrap is expected, with the possibility of a player being sent off or getting a red card if it was just too much intent to fight, but its a physical sport (the men’s game) and what is fighting or just giving a shove is a fine line, and expected. So events in Rabat did not meet the internationally accepted standard of behaviour under FIFA.

    Government relations between Senegal and Morocco, which do not share a geographical border, are very good, very good. The two governments keen to move above the scenes in Rabat have launched the 15th session of the Morocco-Senegal Joint High Commission to take place on January 26-27th in Rabat, with an economic event held alongside to further strengthen business and culture ties. The last Joint High Commission took place in Dakar in 2013 and at governmental level the ties are strong.

    As the 2030 World Cup is scheduled to take place in Morocco, the international FIFA and the higher echelons of the football organisations have 5 years to get their heads around the recent scenes and the arrival of global football onto the violence strewn pitch, images and memories of January 2026. Not an easy task.

    But at ground level, literally and metaphorically, amongst humans with no government role or ideal to uphold, behaviour does not adhere to internationally recognised standards. The regional nature of violence does not really fit into United Nations global standards and definitions, or the FIFA organisation. The centuries old game of cricket the slow way, over a few days, with generally similar cultural norms of players and spectators, including the Barmy Army who would never engage in towel stealing, possible poisonings, umpire hat stealing, etc., would never have to get the head around how to explain localised events with the ICC.

    Events in Rabat could not be clearer on the disjunct between global organisations and local cultural norms. Violence in west Africa is a cultural norm in both acceptable levels of violence within family groups, adult on children (women and men), male on female and female on male, the level of cultural violence is high. Someone would say, how insulting, prove it. But it does prove and anyone knowing anything about west African society and culture knows that. Also in Africa (the huge land mass which has no one identity other than the name extended from either a Yemenite chieftain invading north Africa in C2 BCE or the Romans applying Africa Proconsularis to what is now Tunisia, or probably from both) are still the distinct tribes with distinct territories and languages, with the western national lines of ‘nation state’ drawn across complicated tribal lands. With such reality of society having been long supressed in the ‘UK’ and any public violence put swiftly in prison by Sir Kier Starmer, such general scenes as at Rabat are rarely seen because of the disjunct between global organisation and politics, and the ordinary societal behaviours of biological humans on physical Earth.

    Climate and culture – two very obvious facts that global organisation has reached its limit. Climate of sports events which were never played out of their climatic region and relevance before the last few decades, and cultural levels of acceptable, and normal, behaviour are two very clear evidences that human behaviour on Earth is far from logical. Or is there three? Sadio Mane acted as leader, not a democratic vote or consultation or forum, but one person acting as leader in charge. From that something was salvaged, and the western media makes him a hero. But the function of leadership is shown, the action and the outcome, yes, this event in Rabat shows three very clear evidences that human behaviour on Earth is far from logical.

  • Weather warnings and ‘UK’ takes leave of its senses, requiring SAR (Search & Rescue)

    In the last few months with several named storms (big storms meaning huge waves, 80 mph winds, heavy rain, ice, etc.) and the Christmas period and the New Year period there have been quite a few deaths of humans who inexplicably went into the sea. The media does not report it as a suicide or a crime of neglect of a minor with one of them being under 16, but as a massive hype of drama and action, and in one event in Devon, a man rescued by a passer by was given much air time by Radio 4, high as a kite on the events and how he was rescued, yet two other people at the location were missing and found drowned, but the Beeb reported it from the high as a kite drama.

    After Storm Goretti was announced, severe weather warnings, damage to property and infrastructure expected, the mountain rescue teams in Cumbria’s Lakes & Peaks, and mountain rescue in Scottish high-land locations were called out to humans stuck and injured in difficult terrain – after a severe weather warning had been publicised so well that no one would be in doubt of what was coming. And it did come. And in stormy weather over those last few months, the RNLI and local rescue services were called out to pull humans out of heavy seas – after a severe weather warning had been issued.

    On the gov.uk website under Search and Rescue in ‘the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’ the following Introduction is made (and the below is cut and pasted from the gov.uk website and this writer is not clever enough with the tech to put it into italics):

    “Search and rescue (SAR) is variously defined across organisations and authorities but in essence it is an activity, normally co-ordinated by a rescue co-ordination authority, where available personnel and assets are used to locate persons in distress, potential distress or who are missing, and recover them to a place of safety, providing for their initial medical care and other immediate needs as necessary.

    The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK) provides a comprehensive search and rescue service for persons reported to be in distress or missing on land, on the sea or in the air. The integrated organisation of search and rescue co-ordinators and search and rescue assets, using a comprehensive communications infrastructure, provides a well-developed search and rescue model which also supports the UK’s wider civil contingency arrangements.”

    The gov.uk website lists the various International Treaties under which SAR services in the ‘UK’ must rescue those in difficulty:

    Obligations

    The UK organisation for civil maritime and civil aeronautical search and rescue is derived from the UK Government’s adherence to the following international Conventions:

    There are no International Conventions governing land search and rescue. However, legislation governing Police activity places an obligation on Police Services to protect life and property, and the provision of land SAR services derives from the legislation set out below.

    Legislation

    There may be additional legislation or obligations that impact search and rescue in the UK.

    Scope of search and rescue in the UK

    The UK responsibility for maritime and aeronautical SAR likes within the UK Search and Rescue Region (UKSRR) which covers approx. 1.5 million square miles, Annex A. Inland SAR in this context is that which occurs above the Mean High Water Spring tides (MHWS) on UK land masses.

    The key function for search and rescue in the UK is to ensure a co-ordinated response to SAR emergencies to search for, rescue or recover those missing, or in distress or potential distress on land, sea and shoreline areas including tidal and inland waters, and to co-ordinate those actions. This includes supporting, monitoring, and advising aircraft, vessels, or persons, who may be in difficulty but not distress, until they reach a place of safety, often unaided.

    The above also, cut and pasted from that gov.uk website. Now, the dates of all those various international and national obligations are between the date range 1925 – 2012 and 100 years is a long time ago but so is 2012. Since 2012 society in the ‘UK’ has changed out of all recognition, societal practices have changed out of all recognition, and since covid lockdown a new madness has taken hold that citizens seek thrills and hypes and media glory, and trust the iphone will get them safely up an icy mountain and down again in their plimsolls and as dark has come in.

    100 years ago if a human went into heavy seas after a weather warning had been issued and stressed, well, it probably wouldn’t happen. The healthy and hearty groups of sometimes very old humans who swim every day off the pebbly south coast would never be so stupid to go in heavy seas, because the point is healthy cold water and some of their ages prove that, not to drown themselves and some passers by preferably as well. Never would they do anything which was a high likelihood of an air and sea rescue, never would they treat other humans like that. 100 years ago, or even in 2012, humans were not en masse going up mountains in Cumbria and Scotland and north Wales at all, or international tourists driving the 500 around the top of Scotland, many places had no one around in winter months, now 365 days a year, and apparently 24/7, the humans are acting contrary to nature, society and any shred of common sense.

    What if the government – who has the responsibility of governance of a people and to ensure services run well and systems work well – was to impose a news black out on the now dramatic BBC Radio 4 that in the next storm which will soon be here or next Christmas and New Year for the festive fun seekers there will be no mention of those who have died in the sea or up mountains?

    What if the government – who has the responsibility of governance of a people and to ensure services run well and systems work well – was to issue an edict, or a rescinding of all those international treaties which are made for situations of accidents and unforeseeable events, not for the ‘UK’ of 2025/2026, and to mandate to all SAR services, the official and the voluntary, that a call out to someone in the sea during a storm or up a mountain after a weather warning had been issued and not a farmer getting a sheep or a cow, that call would just have, ‘Sorry mate, not possible, you made your bed, you lie in it (or rather, die in it)’.

    It’s easy to tell who is stuck while in the course of a job, like farmers, or a nurse, or a long distance lorry driver, or a fishing boat, and 24/7/365 the government’s edict would of course make SAR available and put all resources behind that. For those who have taken the choice to act against all advice and which often results in a passer by dying as well, and sometimes a mountain rescue severely injured for life which has happened in Cumbria, the SAR is simply not available.

    For a start the gov.uk website could announce that apart from those doing their jobs, all the international treaties are now n/a, unilateral detaching, there is no SAR for anyone in the sea or off ground level flat paths in rural and mountain areas between Autumn and Spring Equinoxes, when Helios is at the lowest half of the turning year (on this mass of rock spinning in space). It could also announce there is no chance of sueing – suing? that spelling doesn’t look right – a local council, local police force, local highways, local coastguard, nobody. And with the government mandate to the hysterical BBC Radio 4 news programmes, there is no reporting and absolutely no ‘voice of the survivor pulled from the waves,’ having their moment of glory. Furthermore, bodies will have to be retrieved by those who want to, otherwise they go the way of all the natural world.

  • The Assisted Dying Bill: House of Lords kills the Commons

    …. in attempt to block the humane Bill to allow a peaceful passing of those with a terminal illness facing a bad end.

    It’s a complicated matter this process of the Assisted Dying Bill currently passed by the Commons on 20th June 2025 by the 314 in favour, 291 against. Sure, this is a pretty close vote but still a clear vote for the Bill, but Parliament is not the population of the ‘UK’, England and Wales, Britain, however that is said. This Bill is for citizens in England and Wales, and the same Bill content for Scotland is currently at Stage 3 in Holyrood, where again MSPs are not the population, only the representatives of the function of governance. Within the citizen opinion, including Christians, medical staff, vets of course because with animals that is considered the kindest and most obvious course of action and how barbaric it would be otherwise, some hospice staff, some like Markus Campbell-Savours MP who started as opposing the change in law and then looked at the evidence and the facts and changed his vote, and the so many people who don’t quite know how it would work because it is a change but who have witnessed awful and prolonged scenes of someone they know very well and simple biological normality says that is wrong to prevent someone passing out of hell on earth and into a peaceful passing on to avoid the hideous suffering and forced medical applications and leaving their loved ones traumatised for their own remaining lifespan.

    Those against the Bill use a lot of air time and press space and Parliamentary time and now the House of Lords time to give their own personal opinion. Amongst the general public, the overwhelming percentage is for this facility to be available, and it is through the Commons, just required to be scrutinised in the Lords (and Ladies), but under the umbrella of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, the role of the Lords is only to scrutinise what is moving through, not to take hijack.

    If anything has shown up the strange state of affairs in the ‘UK’, the devolved ‘countries’, the power that ‘medicine and science’ now has, the departure from realities of a biological human being, the new power of the individual opinion over the power of an individual to say they’ve had enough suffering, and the question of governance in where does that yes or no exist in practice, then this Bill has it all.

    You’d think that any MP, MSP or HoL member on the left of centre (that’s how ‘UK’ politics is defined) would be very against this Bill because the State now has full control over an individual and is kind and prevents all suffering etc., and it would be the ‘right’ who still understand functional processes who would be on block behind it, but this Bill has had every cross reference and juxtaposition possible. Lord Charlie Falconer, with the solid government legal career and the long time brains and philosophy behind the Parliamentary processes of this issue and Kim Leadbeater MP who has succeeded to at last reach this common sense of the Commons and a vote For, both are in the Labour camp. The Conservative Leader of the House of Lords has said, ‘Peers are entitled to scupper the defective Assisted Dying Bill,’ and the usual vocal range of individuals who are dead set against it for religious zealot or ‘disabled protectors’ are not looking at the function of scrutinising a Bill to make implementation as well worked as possible, but the opposite, no matter what the Parliament Acts say, now matter what the majority of citizens want, no matter the vote in the Commons June 2025, the House of Lords are declaring they are not part of the parliamentary process but their own empire. How bizarre a juxtaposition is that. Because in trying to find every blocking move possible, from time to objections to fake questions on more clarity, to make this Bill die a quiet and low key death (just what the Bill wants to give genuinely suffering terminally ill people), the Lords are killing the parliamentary process itself, and even if this Bill does make it through the hijacking of the Lords, still the parliamentary process will be shown now to be made up of individuals out for their own agenda.

    This perilous situation could show a constitutional crisis if really scrutinised, which is probably not a good idea to do, the evidence and reality is too awful to contemplate. The Island of Man in March 2025 completed its process, with citizens, both Houses of the Tynwald Parliament all pretty much on the same page. After years of debate yes, but the process was smooth, the upper house agreed some amendments, the Bill had been brought by a GP himself, and good clarity is written in and all ready to go. Ready to go that is for the folks of the Isle of Man, but go that is for final assent because the Isle of Man is a Crown Dependency therefore the Crown of the ‘UK’ is going to be granting the final permission for what has already smoothly moved through the Tynwald.

    Furthermore, the approval of Assisted Dying law in Jersey’s State Assembly in May 2024 and a draft law published last September 2025 and which is now undergoing the usual scrutiny and discussion which is the job of those in governance, and hardly likely to have the same scenes of the House of Lords, Jersey also will be waiting patiently with their large parchment, waiting for that Royal Seal of Approval.

    How curious is this under constitutional law. The Crown has power over Crown Dependencies in matters of military and international relations, and Assisted Dying for somebody pretty much there already is you would think hardly a military matter and definitely nothing to do with international relations. Quite the opposite really, it is the most domestic, most basic, most biological and natural thing possible, way below politics or the bigger picture of society. So what a curious situation that the smooth passage of the Isle of Man Assisted Dying Bill is just waiting for King Charles to give his assent, while the famous Palace of Westminster and the House of Lords are in this difficult political balance, and the Scottish Holyrood Parliament have also the individuals who cannot think outside of their own heads and lives and would very much like the Stage 3 to be killed and not become law. What a strange situation.

    If King Charles signed the document and gave it a great big wax seal, pressed his ring into it and said, ‘Well done guys, you’ve done a great process there, lucky citizens in the Isle of Man,’ what would happen in the House of Lords and in Holyrood opponents? It would highlight the really really tenuous historical basis within the ‘UK’ and in these times of the collapsing ‘world stage (only a Shakesperian fiction and yet another fiction the ‘UK’ built its modern framework on) the governance of the physical land area of Britain in the general sense and those 3 Crown Dependencies of Isle of Man, Guernsey and Jersey.

    King Charles, and his late mother, are people who understand the natural world, despite the royal birth both understand biology and the practicalities of running rural life and the inevitability of birth leading to passing on because that is what existence is within this atmosphere on the spinning mass of Earth, so what would happen if in this bizarre stand off, King Charles was to seal his great Seal on that straightforward legislation in the Isle of Man, and have the wax warmed ready for Jersey to present their parchment? For the sake of the present confusion in the ‘UK’ this would be a very simple solution to end the impasse and to show the facts.

  • ID cards for all human and canine citizens in the ‘UK’? A no-brainer.

    A no-brainer in the Merrian-Webster online dictionary is ‘something that requires a minimum of thought,’ and in the Collins online dictionary as ‘something so obvious, simple, etc., as to require little thought.’ AI also pops up a definition on a screen, but this blog does not read AI. Every definition of a no-brainer means basically the same thing, apart from as the Collins online points out, there is a very informal USA slang which could occasionally refer to a person as a no-brainer, meaning they are really stupid, but even that is a bit stupid because there are plenty more words to describe a stupid person which don’t require four syllables, so the usual use of a no-brainer is not about a person themselves, but the action, the proposed plan, the intention to do something which has a tangible evidence.

    Someone might say this title sounds a little muddled. ID cards are for humans who sure, are citizens, but dogs could not have an ID card because they are animals, they don’t have pockets or wallets or an i-phone to have a digital ID. Animals come under licences or certificates, and dogs live with a human who will have an ID of some sort, or live in a charity animal rescue home when it’s owner cannot care for it due to ill health or unforeseen circumstances, or the foreseen circumstances of being a lifestyle accessory and after a big hype then finds itself in an animal rehoming place but that place will have the relevant Council paperwork for trading and animal matters.

    In the ‘UK’ at present an individual human does not have a government ID card but a variety of all sorts of different ID options, and an individual dog does not have its own ID either. Cats wish to be stated that they stand apart from discussions of this nature.

    ID cards are about citizens, and a citizen is the same term for every human citizen because it is not the actual person even though we are ‘citizens’, but it is the legal bond between a governing power and the people of its jurisdiction. This writer studied law a long time ago and finds the terms jurisdiction and jurisprudence endlessly fascinating and unfortunately dropped from common parlance in the rise of the ‘Cult of the Individual.’ Before a digression slips in, the link between a governing power and the people within that jurisdiction – the area of power, control, responsibility, agency, same page – are citizens because that link creates a national country which is on geography but is the actually the geography. Someone from another national jurisdiction might be visiting another geographical region, but it does not make them a citizen when they arrive because they do not have that legal, governmental, citizen link. So a citizen is defined by that legal link of government and governance top down (two more deeply relevant words there, g+g), and of course everybody knows, a citizen in the noun is a human being with both rights and responsibilities under that legal link, back to the governing power which issues the citizenship.

    So an ‘ID card’ is the shorthand for not any ID, not a passport, driving licence, birth certificate, or a few other possibilities which every citizen of a jurisdiction carries, either in its pocket or on its i-phone. The website of World Privacy Forum shows the areas of Earth (that spinning mass of rock in space, held in place by the Light and gravity of Helios)where ID cards are compulsory. This means that every citizen of those nation states all carry the same ID card in the generic sense, with their individual identity on that generic card.

    https://worldprivacyforum.org/posts/national-ids-and-biometrics

    Whether an ID card is ‘mandatory to carry at all times,’ or every citizen has an ID card is only a semantic difference. It is the fact of the citizen ID which is at point here. In the ‘UK’ we do not have citizen ID cards but we did in the National Registration Act 1939, in WWII, and kept until 1952 when Sir Winston Churchill’s government abolished the concept as not just unnecessary but ‘not British’. The population of the ‘UK’ in 1952 was just over 50 million people. Because identification is such a very necessary link in governance, or who is it that is being governed and has these rights and responsibilities, just as penguins can identify other adults and baby penguins out of thousands, such is the care the adults penguins provide with their offspring, the concept of a societal link is the point of this blog. Dyslexia may have taken over there. The point was that for a group of the same species to survive, there has to be that governing link which links the same species, although many many species inhabit the same patch of land and many billions inhabit the Earth, as it spins in space. The information on the Institute for Government’s website gives such a very useful overview of the question of ID cards in the ‘UK’ (apostrophes this blog’s, not the IoG)

    https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/digital-id-cards

    https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/government-still-has-questions-answer-digital-ids

    Tony Blair, of the government which upended the global education network into a bubble which is rapidly collapsing leaving millions in a desperate state, often in a foreign country and unable to go back to the apparent lack of freedoms where they came from, amongst all the other collapses in the ‘UK’ from that era, is in favour of ID cards, though on his ‘Institute for Global Change’ (whatever on Earth that means) webpage states ‘digital ID systems improve governance, facilitate greater inclusion, fuel economic growth, and help governments achieve their core goals.’ The benefits to governments are stated as administering the benefit system more smoothly, and the NHS, and keeping personal data actually safer rather than having many different forms of ID. The last point seems completely valid.

    This blog observes the other direction of travel, as it were, and instead of going outwards into ID cards making it easier to administer governance to the whole world, fuel economic growth however it is believed that would happen, and greater inclusion, this blog is observing what would happen if ID cards or digital was mandated for every citizen of the ‘UK’. The various discussions and half starts of projects, as detailed on the IoG website, since 1952, are on the same legal concept of the link between governing body and humans who are called citizens, the ID card which formalises that neutral fact of the citizen.

    However, from 1952 the society of the ‘UK’ has changed out of all recognition. The population of just over 50m has risen to c.70 million, that’s a rise of 40%, and now instead of localised societies, often in situ for 100s and even 1,000s of years, regional societies formed by the very different geography, accents, agricultural produce or fishing (before decimated by the EU), with the cities and major towns all with the groupings of ethnic minority people from all over Earth, as were the different white people spread over the ‘UK’ from Irish red and brown to the Swedish white sort, the Welsh again, Scotland ranging all from Irish to Norse people, and the Cornish a distinct physique and language, with most humans very close to production of vegetables, meat, fish if coastal, fruit, fresh water, all in their place within the seasonal year. In 2025 with societal collapse, systems collapse, the Palace of Westminster needing urgent repair, the political parties elected on protest votes, appeals to ‘the young’, the stated democracy bringing people from all over the world to have their voice, freedom, opportunity, individual identity, and be assured of guaranteed economic prosperity and not just that but growth, the ‘UK’ is in such a very great opportunity to examine this question of the link between citizen and government.

    In general a mass of confusions can only be sorted if there is a common denominator, and a common denominator in maths is the baseline number of a fraction so 2/5, 3/5 and 4/5 all relate to each other in some way, and as a percentage that is 40, 60 and 80 (just check that, yes, it is) because a percentage is governed by 100 which creates the top down governance to define all the figures, or citizens. Why is the ‘UK’ since the time of reality of war had faded so opposed to ID cards? Reform are against it, Nigel Farage for again the fact that it is just not British. So what is British? The map of countries, the 131 of them, which have ID cards are about functional government, so why in this time of absolute collapse and impending god knows what would a government in the ‘UK’ not want to introduce an ID card, hard copy or digital?

    If there would be one action to rapidly bring many many issues under one alignment, if the centralised link between citizen and gov was an entity in itself, how much in percentage figures would the so many aspects of societal collapse just lose their identity, from the fact of having that identity card? Just by implementing one for each citizen – not offering or encouraging or ‘nudging’ or persuading – how much would society order itself around the concept of the citizen and the restoration of nothing more than the survival of a society requiring a balance of both rights and responsibilities. With everything now filtered through the individual and the days of WWII when raising an army was a reality, and the citizens all formed round the necessary actions for that, and the link land, each human, government was too obvious for anyone to know how things would look in 2025, if one single thing could bring some clarity to the multiplying questions faced by a collapsing society, why not do it?

    Humans are humans, canines are canines, but the concept of ID this blog sees as the same. The concept in really general terms is what is it and what function does it fulfil, and is there any difference between the clarity which ID cards bring to raise the human citizens above their ‘individual rights’ to being just one common denominator of millions within a nation but that new identity which is formed which links government to humans. With the dog population having risen to about 13 million in the ‘UK’ in 2025, for all the reasons of the pandemic when people suddenly wanted a puppy to cheer them up and puppy farms sprang up overnight to provide the new commodity and the dog food industry saw the next economic boom, the dog coats and accessories industries jumped fast into smart outfits for all occasions, the dog sitters, dog walkers, dog psychologists, dog hairdressers, dog therapists, all entered the boom with largely the female humans responsible for this strange madness of creating a sweet little child not from the normal practices of the goodness of men and women interaction (and which was largely good until the ‘women and girls’ misanthropy created the new witch hunt, now against males). The millions of dogs now, 13 million of them, form a whole new society both in the link the (mostly) females have created with a dog instead of a man and which can be controlled and projected onto with ease and the societal chaos in dog bites, plastic bags of dog poo left around, if it is picked up and really why is it not used as fertilizer or something, the new societal issues of vet bills, the need to work from home because of the dog, and of course the inevitable end result of many dogs just being put out to a dogs home when it does not fit anymore with requirements, just as the females now put the men out when they want some of their own individual expression time and space. It is also said to be a ‘British thing’ to love animals, though the French in a much bigger land area have only about half the number of dogs in the jurisdiction of the French government, and in France the link between chien, owner, government is a much clearer alignment than in the ‘UK’. Everyone is more on board, on the same page, the citizens to the government et les chiens avec leur citoyen francais (which has accent of course).

    If a dog licence was required for ownership of any dog from a little pooch to a big strong dog, costing say £10, how would that automatically reduce this new societal crisis of over 13 million dogs in the ‘UK’? It would do, that’s just a fact not an opinion. Why? Because less people would get dogs on a whim, therefore less dogs would be soon taken to an overflowing dogs home, and there would be less of a marketing magnet for venison and duck dog food at £9.99, less of a market for dog coats, hairdressers, psychologists, attacks by off the lead dogs, etc., and less people would find themselves facing a large vet’s bill. Would the RSPCA think that is a good idea? Would the police? Would the many different dog’s homes? Would a societal poll in a neighbourhood, anonymous of course? All probably yes, this blog does not want to assume for anyone. If a government was faced with Yes or No, introduce a dog licence costing £10 to the local council before ownership of a dog is legal, the same response would raise to the human ID card – not fair on the individual, and for the dog’s licence no doubt, how could people be expected to pay £10?

    Human ID cards and dog licences can therefore both be taken as the same governmental issue, and a healthy governance link between citizen and government could put both in place within one month, or thereabouts. Implementing both actions would rapidly bring an alignment, and in alignments that which is not in alignment rapidly falls away because the common denominator forms a living identity. That is not meant to be mystical talk but merely the living reality of the seen and unseen which links a functioning society, of humans or bees or geese or ants or mackerel.

  • Wise men follow the Stars

    The Star of Bethlehem, a UFO, fabrication, or astronomical computation?

    https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/star-of-bethlehem-stopping-comet

    The fixed date of December 25th when the Christians mark the birth on Earth of the son of God stands as a bit of an anomaly in these deep winter weeks in the northern hemisphere, although taken to its logical conclusion, the outcome is very clear.

    Helios at Winter Solstice has an overarching logic. Incrementally the Light from the Sun moves down the horizon, rising and setting lower and lower in east and west until that deep place of pause around the 21st, given as 3:03pm GMT this year in clock accuracy, and laid out by the priests of olde as in the evidence at Newgrange where the newborn Light of the World enters the small portal above the entrance at the turn again from Tropic of Capricorn on its way up to the Tropic of Cancer. We know now that the tilt of Earth on its axis produces this effect but Light is light, and life within the atmosphere depends on it, and which is why in times past the reality of food supplies, frozen winters, circadian rhythms, and the survival of a small society depended on knowing ‘the time of the year.’

    In pre written calendar times the knowledge of passing of time during the dark months would be very useful, and it was known, as Newgrange demonstrates, and the work of Prof. Alex Thom has measured. Prof. Thom, 1894-1985 grew up in 55′-56’N and although his extensive work was roundly put aside by the growing scientific disciplines and specialisms and sub divisions, his work has been proved, and back in those days, life on Earth was in 3d. Not on a digital screen, but from one place and one place only on Earth, in a landscape, with the vast arc of the starry sky overhead. With his son, Dr. Archie Thom, and Dr Euan MacKie, another independent worker therefore able to observe natural facts, their body of written work of astroarchaeology stands as a comprehensive and systematic portrayal of the comprehensive and systematic activity of Neolithic societies in ancient Briton and western Atlantic seaboard. What is astroarchaeology? In a nutshell it could be said to be the societal functioning in alignment with Earth, Helios, Selene, and the brightest stars in the sky at that time.

    https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2009.00368.x https://theorkneynews.scot/2024/12/29/book-review-walking-in-all-of-the-squares-alexander-thom-engineer-and-archaeoastronomer/

    https://www.archaeopress.com/Archaeopress/Products/9781784918330

    Prof. Thom, Dr Euan MacKie, 1936-2020 and down to the present day of Duncan Lunan continuing the work https://www.duncanlunan.com/thestonesandthestars.asp

    With the geographer’s eye and knowledge again, Robin Heath – Bluestone Magic, Temple in the Hills (Bluestone Press) in 2016, right into the big scientific data era, shows how humans marked out their calendar, as did all human societies over Earth as the available Light of the Sun moved from the tilt of the Earth, and some still do. Robin Heath –https://www.skyscript.co.uk/moonheath.html – speaks of what all native societies practice, because there is nothing else. T

    he Hebrew calendar in the ancient Middle East marked festival days from lunar and solar correlations, making it not an exact ‘modern calendar’ day, just as the first Full Moon of the new Lunar cycle in Anglo-Saxon pagan was known as the Wolf Moon, from the sound of wolves calling in the cold, then icy, nights. And beyond the Anglo-Saxons, Germanic Yule and Scandinavian Jol, fortunately for them less interrupted societal practices and still active participation with Odin and Freya and the pantheon of gods and godesses and alignment with the true facts of Sol and Earth, enter the Jul Blot in accordance with the dying and rebirth of the Light. Drinking and feasting and sacrificing, it is in the rising again of the Light of the World.

    Yule now put, especially among us pagan folk, as the 21st December being keen to reinstate something of societal stability based on reality in the ‘UK’ is not Celtic but fully Germanic and Norse, and is not the date of 21st December. That is the Winter Solstice itself. With the traumatic history of Britain from Christian belief, it is relative and not intended as actually wrong, merely the best that we can do under difficult circumstances of the last 1,500 years. Constantine’s 336 CE declaring Christianity the official state religion required a festival day, in true pagan practice, and the allocation of 25th of December as the birth of Jesus Christ can be read as a, or the, major departure from the real facts of humans upon the Earth. The evidence shows Constantine acted from political expediency for all the reasons that study of that period open up, but from western society on a mass of spinning rock in space, the fixing of a son of a god in the sky born in a manger on December 25th puts the Son of the Christian god and the Sun, Helios, Sol, An Ghrian, which is the fundamental fact of existence on Earth in direct conflict. At first, and for several 100s of years, the Christian festival on December 25th merged in with the traditional Roman feast of Sol Invictus, given by Aurelian in 274 CE as the official Roman cult, the Unconquered Sun, because no human can conquer the Sun, and the fun of Saturnalia, merged in with the Jewish month of Kislev. The eastern Mediterranean peoples were Greeks, Jews, Romans, with the centres of Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople and Ephesus. We here in Britain were definitely still barbarians in that time. Study of the switch from the Sun to the Son tends to stay within history and not theology, for the reason of this fundamental and unreconcilable belief in facts. Belief in the Son leads away from Earth into a place so unconnected with Earth that it is hard to see in 2025 nearly 2026 how folks can still hold such beliefs, but they do. Belief in the Sun, in the inevitable moving down the horizon into winter months, the portal of Winter Circle of stars, magnitude one stars, bright and clear, of Capella, Aldebaran, Rigel, Sirius, Procyon, and Pollux, with Orion clear in the middle, and the vast history of human societies into the portal, down, and out into the reborn Light, as one human gets incrementally older and passes on into spirit, and new humans are born, but always contained within the majestic facts of Earth and Sol, Earth and Sky.

  • Winter Solstice 2025, the 4.5 billionth-ish on Earth

    21st of December 2025 in the northern hemisphere is the ‘Winter Solstice’ and in the modern era possible to measure the exactitude in minutes, which this year on Greenwich Mean Time was 3:03pm when the Light of An Ghrian, Helios, the Sun, Ra, Sol, is in the pause above 23.5’S, named the Tropic of Capricorn, does pause for a few days. This is not to take time out and consider whether to return north or just continue south and soon leave the Earth is an awful cold and dark, not to mention spinning off somewhere in space from the lack of gravity, but from the tilt of Earth which creates this slight shift from north to south hemispheres. Helios will be born again,

    It all makes sense from the bigger picture when the human sees the models, or nowadays on a digital screen, and can see how from a northern latitude’s position the corresponding exact equal and opposite is experienced in the southern hemisphere (half – of Earth) because geometry is geometry, and luckily gravity holds it all in place.

    So 3:03pm GMT, or UTC now but between Helios and Earth the name of the line is irrelevant and the human drawn line of longitude Pole to Pole only states the fact that Winter Solstice in northern hemisphere equals Summer Solstice over the equator and down into the south Pole. This is the fact.

    However, it could be said that in the exactitude of modern measurement now down to 3:03pm for us in GMT, the word Solstice itself has got lost. Like so much in the Protestant ‘west’ which has gone further and further into detail and data and data and detail, the Heliostasio for the Greeks and the Solstitium for the Romans was not a minute or an hour or a day but as the name says, the stand still, the pause.

    The latitude of Athens at 38’N and Rome 42’N is itself a difference, but in the geographical Mediterranean lands the history is interconnected and the necessity to observe celestial movements was not a pass time but for maritime navigation, agriculture, observing civic functions, etc., none of which correlate to the modern era when information appears at the touch of a button (until the next Big Solar Flare). Because the facts are still the same of Sunlight falling onto the Earth surface as it spins in space, the now obscured word of the standing still, or the pause (fortunately to come back again) would once a long time ago have been a different societal time than the 3:03pm of last Sunday. a trajectory follows through to the present time of 2025. However, when the pause of Helios is where Bamako in Mali at 12.5’N

    Bamako in Mali at 12.5’N has only a short pause because Nay, as the Dogon tribe call the giver of Light and warmth, is not greatly angled above. The shadows do not fall long, and about 11.5 hours of sunlight are given at deepest midwinter. Up to Oran, Algeria, at latitude 35’N, and about 9.5 hours of Light came to Earth. Up again to Caen, and the busy ferry port where 8 or so hours of Light are experienced by the humans at that place on the Earth. Over La Manche and up to Hull, at 54’N (rounded up or down), with 7.5 hours of Light, and then its into open sea as the GMT line heads east of the ‘UK’, not correlating with dry land until the Svalbard archipelago under Norwegian governance. Longyearbyen on Svalbard, (on because although all humans are ‘on’ the Earth, it is said that a human is ‘on’ a small island, and ‘in’ a landmass) at 78’N has daylight hours at Winter Solstice of ….. zero. Not only is it zero ‘on the 21st December’ but it is zero for the whole of December, and the month either side of November and January. That is where the pause of Helios becomes the standstill. This is common knowledge, facts do not need to be referenced here because it is geographical fact.

    However, this blog is very interested in the correlation or not of human society on geographical fact, and Solar fact, and this measurement of hours of Light in the Winter Solstice (and equally the opposite in the southern hemisphere) compared with universal time where anyone can sit on a computer or a smart phone and do the same thing via digital tech is the most stark evidence of a society’s departure from the facts. Until the worldwide web of time and info created the disembodied communication zone, a society measured only to its allocated hours of Light and the physical food, water, shelter, language, clothing materials from that.

    Here in mid latitudes of the British Isles and Ireland, between 55′-56’N, allocated Light at Winter Solstice is about 7 hours, and a few days later it is really not much difference as An Ghrian is a long, long way south, and it could be under the definition of stand still rather than pause with several more weeks of Deep Midwinter before almost imperceptibly the hours of Light start to lengthen again. The western world is certainly not now constructed upon Solar time and the length of that pause …. or stand still for days …. but if it was, if the whole of society paused or stood still with Helios, laid low, slept, reset its circadian rhythms, feasted around a fire, sang and recited poetry, observed the winter stars, and caught up with kith and kin, how wonder-full that would be.

  • Hell in 1601, Jan Breughel the Elder & Hell in 2025, Digital Tech

    ‘Hell’ The painting signed 1601 by Jan Breughel the Elder, 1568-1625, (image downloaded from Artvee, which would not have been possible in 1601) is formed of oil paint on copper and shows humans in Hell, a Christian construct. In Medieval times Antwerp was a major trade market with copper from (now) eastern Europe so not hard for JB to get a sheet of copper. This scene of Hell mixes classical mythology and monsters and demons and various other contexts relevant of the time, but the title is clear, the humans are in Hell.

    Switch forward a mere 425 or so years, what would a similar picture of Hell be today? Well, it could be a scene of millions of humans attached to a hardware device which needs electricity to power it (and the resources for which are running out on the Earth surface), either a relatively big one of a laptop or a desktop computer, or a tiny one of a very smart phone, with hundreds of demons sitting in the inbox, the draft box, the sent box, 1000s of what were once known as photos and 36 was the maximum you could get (if all came out okay), and random images and things flashing up on the screen, all designed to take the human further into the abyss of Hell, and further taking the natural world down into the abyss of destruction (of which the human is also a part factually).

    Winter weeks of 2025, the human in 2025 faces the onerus task of ‘catching up on emails’, most of which are now lost in the 100s gone by, and how to unpick which are relevant and which not, which of the 1000s of pics is the one it is looking for, the temptation of the free email providers unable to be faced and to get itself a private email address because a few pounds a month seems like pure robbery yet the mountain of digital tech things now streaming through a hardware device, how on Earth would Jan Breughel the Elder even begin to paint this hideous scene?

  • ‘Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow…’

    To lift directly from Wikipedia (and to fully reference, this was done on Sunday 14.12.2025, at around 5.30pm GMT) the song ‘Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow…’ also known as simply, ‘Let it snow…’ is the song written by lyricist Sammy Cahn and composer Jule Styne in July 1945 in Hollywood, California, during a heatwave as Cahn and Styne imagined cooler conditions. The song was first recorded that fall by Vaughn Monroe, released just after Thanksgiving when the Solar year had turned towards winter, and became a hit by Christmas.

    The song makes no mention of any holiday. The lyrics include spending time with a loved one during a snowstorm, enjoying a fireplace and popcorn. When the singer has to leave, feelings of love will keep him warm once he is outside in the cold. The song has come to be regarded as a Christmas song worldwide due to its winter theme, and is often played on radio stations during the Christmas and holiday season. It has been covered by multiple artists on Christmas-themed albums.[5] (This paragraph has been copied and pasted, hence the underlines and the number 5)

    As many information sources state, the original Cahn, Styne, Monroe ‘Let it snow…’ had the greatest chart success in the various No. 1’s and chart toppers of all different ‘western’ countries, but it is Frank Sinatra’s single vinyl or vinyl single in 1950 and Dean Martin’s album vinyl in 1959 which in 2025 comes over the airwaves of radios and shops from mid November, after the Christmas merchandising has been settled onto the shelves from somewhere back in August.

    Whether it was the Sinatra or the Martin version, this writer would not know, but the familiar tune and the familiar words, pleasant and wintry and the world is all in order as another Christmas comes round, the song came over the airwaves of a medium sized shop somewhere along the Newcastle upon Tyne to Carlisle stretch of urban settlement, and which shop it was and where it was is not relevant. The details are neither relevant in the fact that a human walked on a certain street in Edinburgh in the evening of 14.12.2025 where the same human walking the same street 25 years ago, 2000 CE, but the facts of the natural world are relevant because in 2000 CE that street was icy, most of the winter in Edinburgh was around the snow, ice, frost temperature zone, and the same street in 2025 on the same-ish date now has rain in bucket fulls, torrents, streaming down and a zillion tourists from all over the world, all expecting the Scotland of films and romantic legend, but finding only extortionate prices, shoulder to shoulder with only other tourists, and rain running in rivers down the dark cobbled streets. The relevance of ‘Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow…’ in 2025 as taken to the natural world is ‘Please let it snow…, please!’ because from 1945, now 80 years ago, to 2025, the fundamental facts of the natural world upon the Earth have not changed and H2O still moves between ice, snow, frost, water, steam according to the temperature scale, but there is now no snow.

    In that shop, only one of many hundreds, thousands, up and down the ‘UK’ where the Christmas music plays and most of it several decades old when a human sang with guitar and drums and it had a beginning, middle and end, so whether Sinatra or Martin’s vinyl, Slade, Queen, all the familiar songs fill the airwaves and tell us all is okay, and probably it was roughly speaking until about 10 years ago. Not too much discrepancy between words, goods, facts, cultural traditions, and a distinct possibility of that ‘white Christmas’ which we all know means snow on Christmas Day, such is the cultural magnetic pull of western modern life into making the Big Day perfect in every way. In 2025 where the laws of nature still obey the temperature scale, as they always will, the hope that it might snow will not be to re-create the original song where the loving couple were by the hearth (it was written for a few months later, no one would release a song about snow in high summer because everyone knows it cannot snow in high summer)and the pervading warmth of hearth and love would stay in the human when they went out in the snow, but to really hope that it might snow to show there is still some tiny grain of hope that climate catastrophe is not imminently imminent but still a way off. If it snows over Christmas or in the run up during December, all will be okay. After that, those in the ‘UK’ now complaining about anything below 15′ will resume and the Christmas separate world, separate conditions, separate requirements, will be put back in the box until next November.

    In that shop, as in many, a heater now blasts heat out above the door, really blasts it so the humans with sensitive skin get heat irritation as if walking into a dry sauna too fast. In the traditional image of western Christmas, invented not just as Christmas itself was stitched together to create a date and an event, but the merchandising which has happened during the 1900s, there are no intruding facts to alter the traditional happy scene, and regardless of the state of affairs in 2025, the arrival of music, turkey, and the hope that it will be that ‘white Christmas’ stand firm as what Christmas is all about from the 1900s development of the event. If all the goods in the shop were quantified for the logistical impact on that change from snow to errr… rain and lots of it, and the logistical impact of shipping the packaging back to be ‘recycled’ by other countries for a suitable payment, the number of cars now driving into town centres compared to 1945 or the 1950s, and above all the electricity used in lighting shops and lighting Christmas decoration, and that direct and fairly shocking heat of being blasted out over open doorways, how long can we play these Christmas songs using the word ‘snow’ when there is none. ‘Raindrops keep falling on my head’ would be more relevant, sung by this writer forget who now, but it is a song, and Driving home for Christmas through the floods and road diversions would be factually more connected to life in 2025 ‘UK’ than the temporary suspension of reality in the imagery of 1900s.

    Of course all shops have to shift as much goods as possible in December, get as many people in through the door as possible, especially with the months afterwards with no major merchandising festival until Easter, apart from Valentine’s of course, but that’s really just chocolate and smaller things, and in the era of government hike’s on business rates and all things hard working, what can a shop do but make it as easy for a customer to enter its portals, and no one wants to talk about the facts of the natural world that humans are under the same fundamental facts as the rest of the living world and water itself. The divergence of human activity from the fundamental facts is complete, the heat blasting over an open doorway is fully believed to go only onto the humans to give them a comfortable experience while shopping, and conveniently does not impact the air around in any way. It’s very strange, isn’t it?

  • Ukraine: where exactly do we stand in this geographical conundrum?

    President Zelensky, wearing a suit, in No. 10 Downing Street, with the leaders of the ‘UK’, France and Germany.

    In today’s discussions between the leaders of the four countries, Sir Kier Starmer said, ‘We stand with Ukraine.’ Who are ‘we’, what does it mean ‘to stand’, and where is Ukraine are three questions which jump out of such a woolly statement, and of course there are many others, so many and at such a complexity which is way beyond the ken of this simple pagan blog.

    After Downing Street President Zelensky has met the NATO chief, and the President of the EU, and then to Italy and Rome, all in a few days and at meetings at the highest leadership level of the many organisations, alliances, groupings, opinions, possible support giving and definitely opinionators in this strange patchwork of jurisdictions over the lands north of the Mediterranean Sea and to the borders with Russia, with NATO itself extending over the …. Atlantic Ocean …. to the USA and Canada.

    What does Zelensky want? Money, weapons, opinion to go against Russia, and troops, and to join NATO, and probably the EU as well. Everything from that looks into this strange patchwork as if these few days of discussions could yield a tangible result and within a month a large army of fit and well trained troops would head east and win the war for Ukraine. ‘UK’ politicians are keen on the idea of developing the arms industry, such is the economic plight going on here, and if someone would pay for them, there is probably a large stack of weapons which could be provided. If one weapon followed another, at astonishing monetary cost and destructive to human life, would that end the war and bring a long lasting solution to conflict in that region. News has it that Sir Kier has promised assistance worth £100bn to Ukraine, and that’s something the veterans in the UK wish that just a tiny weeny fraction of a fraction of that would be provided to give them a safe place to live, like other countries honour and care for those returning from traumatic combat. But £100bn can be promised to Ukraine.

    From an outside looking in everything looks simple and uniform – in the sense of that word being ordered and clear and its purpose obvious. From the inside, everything looks different. The grouping of Sir Kier Starmer, President Macron and President Steinmeier with President Zelensky fits no one piece of the patchwork. The ‘UK’ has left the ‘EU’, NATO has the word Atlantic in the title and only the west coast of France faces the Atlantic Ocean, its north coast faces la Manche (the sleeve of water and which it does look like a sleeve) and which the English call not surprisingly the English Channel, and the coast of Germany faces the North Sea. How far does a coastline stretch, even the coastline of a mighty ocean like the Atlantic? Well, a long way in NATO. The Atlantic facing countries of the ‘UK’, Republic of Ireland, France, Spain and Portugal, and Canada and the USA on the other side are not one particular grouping at all, and why does Morocco, Mauritania, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia not be included in the geographically named North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, or at least down to Senegal? Because of course the regions down the west Atlantic coast of Africa have their own cultures, political systems, tribal matters and conflicts and violent wars going on, and are not included in the ‘western’ matters of the geography north of the Mediterranean Sea. And the Irish Republic neither is in NATO, because ironically of the war the ‘UK’ is waging over several centuries onto the land and people of Eire.

    If one unifying factor was to offer troops to Ukraine, would unify the patchwork of terms and acronyms and promises and confusions? There also it cannot be a uniform grouping, because of that matter of uniforms. Troops wear uniforms, it is how they are identified as being for one side or the other, and the uniforms show something of their national origin, and of course there is the flag. The Vexed question of Vexillology gets more and more intractable. Between the four leaders meeting in Downing Street today, Ukraine is undergoing the war with Russia, it’s soldiers are physically fighting, and Germany and France have announced that national service is going to be reinstated, on a voluntary basis, but movement is movement. Intention comes before the sign of movement, and physical movement has a direction. In the chain of four men, one in the east in an active fighting war, France and Germany in the middle, and over La Manche Sir Kier Starmer talking about ‘we stand with Ukraine.’ The problem is that it is the ‘UK’ which does not stand with Ukraine, only in social media and armchair opinions, but in reality, it is the ‘UK’ which cannot raise troops to send over to assist.

    What if tomorrow it was announced that all young people – males and females, and everyone in between in the legality of gender equality, – between 16-35 was to report to their local Forces of Army, Air Force and Navy and begin a quick programme of boot camp training to get into battle ready condition within 2 months, what would happen? Answer: Nothing. In the ‘UK’ we have no cohesion to raise a force. In France, the Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, the young people are within an alignment of government, a functional police force able to do their job, a sense of citizen identity, and there is already the understanding that if mobilisation is necessary then physical readiness needs to be there. In the ‘UK’ where has that national citizen energy gone?

    The last 25 years of Tony Blair ‘uni’s’, the selling off of playing fields where schoolchildren used to run around, the dropping off the radar of national service where young men went through the training and learnt a lot of other things besides while females served the nation in the other equally necessary ways for the functioning of a society, the collapse of the NHS and ‘social care’ resulting in millions of workers being flown into the ‘UK’ to prop up the organisations set up by the Labour government and whose only allegience to coming here is for the salary and the benefits, and who many would not be at all happy if their children were now requisitioned into an army instead of living their new life in the ‘UK’ with all the amenities and ease of this still not too hot or climatically disastrous country. The countries who have one calendar with one predominant belief system, even if folks do believe it or not, but the society does hold together from it, the people move at roughly the same tempo. Here in the ‘UK’ now with so many religions and beliefs and allegiances with so many places on Earth, and so many different views on gender and family structure and cultural norms, it would not be possible to ‘raise an army’ because we have no cultural or societal cohesion.

    What if Sir Kier Starmer took back his offer of £100bn assistance and said sorry, we can’t afford it, and instead waved from the English side of La Manche and said good luck, not a great situation you’re all in over there, but here on the Atlantic we’ve got a lot of problems going on and after all, charity begins at home? It is not likely he would do that, but in the chain of events and the chain of people all meeting in these few days, someone talking about the relevance of geographical and oceanic terms would be such a welcome relief.

  • The Terminally ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in Westminster now

    Assisted dying: the Kindest thing that Life can offer

    Herein lies a great paradox, and possibly this current matter contains one of the greatest paradoxes of all ‘UK’ modern time. The Terminally ill Adults (End of Life) Bill – to repeat the full title, with the addition of ill written like that because Ill is actually a capital ‘i’ with two lower case ‘l’s’ which look like purely three capital ‘i’s’ which doesn’t mean a lot. Reversing upper and lower case to iLL equally works, but whether iLL or ill, the fact is the same, The Terminally ill/iLL Adults (End of Life) Bill is about one thing only, not general illness or serious illness, it is about terminal illness and to make it doubly clear End of Life has been included in the title. A terminus is the end of the line. In Eastbourne, East Sussex, Terminus Road outside the rail station is just that, the end of the train line and the beginning of the walk to the seafront. There are many terminus rail stations where the train will not go forward because it is the end of the line. Stranraer is another, as is North Berwick, and as is Tweedbank in the recent history of the resumed Borders Railway.

    Terminal is definite, factual, measurable, an overarching situation within which all the normal daily life events are relegated to that vastness of human birth and death of the physical life, and which we call a span. A span does end otherwise it would not be a span, it would just go on and on and be actually nothing.

    Certainly there are those few who are expected to pass shortly yet continue on months, even a year, or occasionally (very occasionally) even longer. In the scheme of things, which under this Bill is life and passing/physical death, terminal means terminal, the buffer is in sight and everyone knows it, primarily the person themselves.

    As Leader of the Opposition (and how different things look when you are in opposition and free to promise anything, challenge anything, opinionate on anything) Sir Kier Starmer promised Dame Esther Rantzen, herself terminally ill in the biologically factual sense of the word, that if his party gained power they would definitely give time to this issue. Esther Rantzen was talking biologically. Sir Kier Starmer was talking politically and after the sweeping Labour victory Sir Kier has not followed through on that. Probably the statement was made in the giddy whirl of celebrity, not realising that Dame Esther was talking biologically, real life, pragmatically.

    It has been, paradoxically, the Labour MP Kim Leadbeater’s Private Member’s Bill to bring the subject into the public legislative realm. and paradoxically again, Lord Falconer’s, a Labour peer, clear thinking and drafting in 2014 bringing this base matter into Parliament. Base as in basic, not base as in gross, which opponents view it, for the two-pronged religious opponents – the very religious Christians and now other religions which now have a power presence in the ‘UK’ but it is the Christians who turn out in front of Parliament to oppose the Bill and whose hatred of the supporters is scarily near wanting to do away with them (us) with no terminal illness present, and the politically religious who believe that ‘the State’ is heaven on Earth and is the one to give or take away, and any rejection of ‘the State’ is akin to aligning yourself with the political devil domain.

    And thinking about it, there has now appeared a third religious-type opponent, of the individuals who do not have full mobility and therefore need to use a chair on wheels to get around, and which must be a big trial every single day, but who have appeared as an equal right opponent to this Bill. Pam Duncan-Glancy in the earlier part of 2025 when Assisted Dying appeared in Holyrood and Tanni Grey-Thompson as a current member of the House of Lords where this Terminally iLL Adults (End of Life) Bill is currently being debated – having been passed through Parliament and to repeat, having been passed through Parliament – and the very personal and very public on radio and TV and social media that is said this Bill is trying to kill us does factually show more a narcissistic personality issue than being able to read the title of a Bill from which it is too obvious to even debate that n/a to them. And within the very personal opponents are those who say their loved one did survive a lot longer than expected, and it led to that closeness which inevitable death brings and which is a good memory for those, but only because the person could talk, was not begging to die, was not asking why their loved ones were not doing the kindest thing possible of ending the fear and horror of a very bad death. But because politics is now all about the individual, even a new ‘Cult of the Individual’, and the individual voice and experience rather than the function of governance, even in the inner workings of government under the ‘UK’ and in the devolved chaos left by Tony Blair, in a debate as baseline as bad and traumatic endings for a terminally ill person and all around them, the illogicality of someone who is not terminally ill being able to speak in a debate as if it is about them, well, such is the state of governance in the ‘UK’.

    Biology being biology, very many animal ‘owners’ or co-workers with animals however we define the various human-animal pairings can see when a bad ending is approaching and when that measurable point has appeared – like not able to eat or drink, being in obvious pain and distress, losing a lot of weight or bodily distortion of the part where the terminal illness is taking over – take the no-option decision out of care for the animal to either visit the vet or have the vet come to the animal especially for big farm animals, or the farmers of which there are still a few just have to act according to natural principles, which is to end mindless suffering. It is not legal in the ‘UK’ for a human to go to a vet, and this writer never understands this. Biology is biology and especially with End of Life Terminal iLLness, the principles are the same.

    The opponents – all three, the religious zealots, the State zealots, and the personal zealots who cannot read the title to know it would not apply to them unless they had a terminal illness – who have introduced in the HoL, House of Lords, and Ladies now, the very very long list of objections to this Bill which has already been passed through the Commons say that the Bill is not clear, all the grey areas will lead to abuse and coercion, and their list goes on and on. In logical thinking it is the opposite, and the current situation is the chaotic one.

    The title is as clear as could be, and all alongside this is the option for the person approaching the very bad end to ‘go to Dignitas’. The word Dignitas sounds very like Dignity, which of course is what it is. Dame Esther says she may consider that herself. It all stands as yet another avoidance in the ‘UK’ of the void – in food, in energy supplies, in education systems, in the apparently free NHS, in soft global power, in the ships which leave our coastline every night laden with tons and tons of recycling to be processed by some quiet arrangement with a sizable payment involved, and the option safely just outside the ‘UK’ of Dignitas where every opponent of this Bill in the Commons and the Lords/Ladies must know it exists. All the countries and USA states who have integrated Assisted Dying into their daily life governance systems, and now the Isle of Mann in 2023 Parliament now in law in 2025 and awaiting Royal Assent, are those who see a human as biology over sociology and politics, and whose government structures align with logical processes.

    Would the House of Lords opponents argue that those going for a Dignified passing at Dignitas are doing something illegal, because they are British citizens therefore should be bound by laws of Parliament? Their long list of ‘points needing clarification’ could easily be reversed by looking at facts, such as the Isle of Mann, our very near neighbours around the North Sea who take a very baseline approach to humans on the physical Earth, and also to those MPs who started off opposing the Bill from back in 2014 but who then saw physical reality in someone close to them, and that horrible, shocking, deeply inhuman and torturous last few weeks or months changed their mind, and the reality of this Bill became clear, and they this time voted for it.

    Yes, the process of this Bill, now passed through the Commons but being determedly held up by the Lords/Ladies does show almighty collision of all things biological, health systems, politics, religion and the new ‘Cult of the Individual’. If Dame Esther does decide to go for that uncomplicated, inevitable and clear ending out of ‘UK’ jurisdiction then maybe this would be the year of a watershed of common sense could reappear in ‘UK’ politics and a return to the real facts of life, and death, which are biology on a physical planet where everything has a span, and within which we are just very little cogs in a very big cycle.

  • Marketplace Money: Market and Oikos

    This blog, written from the perspective of the observable and measurable facts of life on Earth which are that Helios, Grian, Ra, Ri, Hvare-khshaeta, there are many names for the same fact, and that fact of Helios appearing and disappearing at the angle and therefore heat strength of latitude, is always measuring to that one baseline fact for all humans, regardless of subject, and not at all from a personal perspective. A personal perspective is about an individual but a group of 10 humans standing in the same place would be at the same latitude therefore Helios would rise and set at the same angle over all of them, and they would all see the same environs surrounding them, if they used their eyes not their phones.

    Marketplace Money: Market and Oikos will become a subscription blog upcoming, when the tech is navigated (navigated being yet another appropriation of an ancient word from entire history of human societies until the last 100 or 200 years when it had electricity, leaving apart this bizarre digital age which will fail in a second at a major Solar flare, including this blog of course because this blog is written from the perspective of these basic facts), while thelogicalview.co.uk in general will continue putting out apparently unrelated subject matter, except it is all looking at the same baseline facts, which is how human society fits into reality, which is Helios, Earth, Light, gravity, water, food, shelter, and all within a specific geography.

  • The Vexed question of Vexillology – Part 4

    St. Andrew’s Day in Scotland and Russia, 30th November 2025

    Lactantius (Lucius Caeclius Firmianus Lactantius), a Christian advisor at the court of Constantine I, wrote in ‘On the death of the Persecutors’ that Constantine had had a dream before the battle of Milvian Bridge to place the Chi Rho symbol of Christ’s name on his soldiers shields. Constantine did win at Milvian Bridge, against Maxentius, whose head was paraded through the streets of Rome and became sole ruler of the western Roman Empire, and after defeating the eastern Emperor Lucinius in 324, ruler of the entire Roman Empire, ending the complications under shared rule of the Tetrarchy and the geographical impossibility of cohesion between such a huge territory. The one Christian God instead of pagan practices and the pantheon of gods headed by Jupiter, Juno and Minerva was a novelty and one God, one Emperor sat well for Bishop Eusebius’ ambitions for the rise of Christianity.

    The Chi Rho as Labarum military flag under Constantine could be said to mark a divergence in Vexillology between function of humans on land, and manipulation of belief, Constantine as a Christian or Constantine as a follower of the Sun, the source of Light and Life for all of earth, and as Sol Invictus which from Aurelian in 274 had been the official Roman cult. The Persian cult of Mithras, coming into the Roman Empire from eastern territories, was the elite Army cult, with initiation ceremonies and secret practices, such as all elite groups have and need to have to perform their difficult function for their society. Mithras, a Sun-god, was the god of contract, truth and justice, because Helios is the ultimate measure of all life on Earth, at whichever latitude and by whichever name. What exactly Constantine I was referring to as the God in the sky, it was directed by those with the writings and those with the intent to interpret for the Christians.

    Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea in his ‘the Life of Constantine’ started in 337 when Constantine I died, and uncompleted at Eusebius’ own death in 339, wrote that Constantine had definitely told him that before the battle of the Milvian Bridge in Rome, 25 years before, he and his soldiers saw a vision of a cross in the sky, and the Christian god saying, ‘In this sign, conquer’.

    https://www.numisforums.com/topic/6146-what-if-constantine-had-seen-this-instead

    https://www.thecollector.com/constantine-the-great-christian-religion-or-pragmatist

    A mere 500 years later, in present day East Lothian, the battle now known as the battle of Athelstaneford, at the Peffer Burn, was recorded by Water Bower, b. 1380s in Haddington, (by that time in Scotland not Northumbria) in his ‘Scotichronicon’, written in his latter years in the 1440s as Abbott of Incholm Abbey, on a small island on the north coast of the Firth of Forth. Walter Bower studied at St. Andrew’s University, in the town which c.1200 had acquired some relics of St. Andrew and the town was named St. Andrews. The now major pilgrimage centre brought much money and trading activity to the town. St. Andrew was said to have been martyred on a diagonal cross at Patras in the 60’s CE, and his symbol of a white diagonal cross on blue background decreed as identification on soldiers uniform by the Scottish Parliament in 1385.

    A jurisdiction and a government needs to be identified, and the human as a biological animal uses eyes to identify images and physical objects. It has also the senses of touch, sound, taste, and various others, but sight is the definition of human societal groupings, ethnicity and territory.

    In Bower’s writing, the battle at Athelstaneford in 832 had Athelstan, King of the Angles, meeting (in the battle sense) the Picts under Angus mac Fergus in their incursion into the territory of Northumbria, aided by the Scots under Eochaidh, King of Dalriada. As the oral tradition went, the northern folks saw a white cross of St. Andrew in the sky before the battle, and the Saint aided them in a great victory against Athelstan and his southern army, after which like the Chi Rho, the cross of St. Andrew became the symbol of the new united Picts and Scots in Alba under Kenneth MacAlpin in 843, the grandson of Eochaidh, and so Alba became modern Scot-land, not Pict-land. Pict-land of the geography above the Firth of Forth, and the Scots to the west, above the Clyde, lived within the natural geographical demarcation of Stirling, the portal from north to south, and in times long gone by when the water level was higher, the only land travel place. Such are the conditions for the human created by geography.

    Walter Bower, in formalising real historical movements and battles between very different tribes and societal groupings in their very different geographies of north and south Britain, and west and east, wrote of the event around the Peffer Burn. Athelstan however was not born until the 890s and was the King of the Anglo-Saxons 924-927, and uniting by emerging as the victorious, King of a united England 927-939. There was a united Alba-land and a united England. The King Athelstan of the 900s did campaign (in the old sense of the word which meant a military excursion to create maximum destruction against the enemy) in the north, against Constantine and a combined forces from Dublin and Vikings, an almighty collision of different newly solidified powers within Britain. The site of this victory for Athelstan is put variously over middle Britain from the Wirral to Yorkshire to the present day Scottish lowlands, and far from the events in 832 in Peffer Burn.

    It is those events, even if now historically mixed up in Athelstan who has his name as the village of Athelstaneford even if he could not have been there. Eanred was King of Northumbria 810-841, so maybe it was he who met the Picts and the Scots at the Peffer. Who knows. But the Saltire of white diagonal cross on blue background nearly 1,200 years later is unchanged, and the feast day of St. Andrew on November 30th is marked throughout Scotland as flag and Saint combined. Russia also marks the feast day of St. Andrew on November 30th, under the Russian flag of white, blue and red horizontal stripes.

    Athelstaneford is in East Lothian, in Scotland, with the Scots and the English fighting all the way through the centuries and Berwick upon Tweed and Carlisle castles being captured, by both sides many times, bloody battles, prisoners and razing to the ground. East Lothian in then Northumbria, and the events around the Peffer Burn birthing the Saltire image of peoples beyond Stirling, to the Scotland-England border fights along the river Tweed, to English taking Berwick again and a now border of part geography of the Tweed, part England up to Eyemouth, the debateable lands subdued over west and the Solway forming the other end of the turbulent history, these latitudes of 55′-56’N, we contain here a microcosm of a complicated macrocosm and possibly with the cross of St. Andrew a flag of Christian belief and the cross of St. George a flag of Christian belief with St. Patrick added into the Union Jack in the 1801 ‘Union’, could there be a more comprehensive study of flags, land, belief, ethnicity, shifting territory, and the relationship of image to identity?

    A sketch from Trapain law overlooking East Lothian and Firth of Forth, AEMW 31.05.2025

  • A Budget Blueprint

    To bring society and economics onto the same page, on the same land

    This week is Budget Day in the ‘UK’ 2025 and was there ever a more complicated picture in the history of human society than the ‘UK’ in 2025?

    Someone might say yes of course there is, the war zones, the big global conferences trying to find something to publish afterwards of a consensus, the questions of space travel to find rare minerals to put into the endless expansion of the digital world, all these questions are put out as the big questions of 2025, and a load more besides.

    In Budget Week 2025, here in this little arrangements of geography, how radical would it be to refocus everything, not upwards but ….. downwards.

    What would downwards mean? Downwards would look at facts and write those facts on a small piece of paper, or no bigger than an A4, which of course does not exist in the natural world. What does exist in the natural world? The Earth does exist, and the Earth is totally dependent on the Sun. The humans who live on Earth are not just totally dependent on Earth itself, which is dependent on the Sun, but also on dry land, food source, water, shelter, and what is called ‘society’, fundamentally for procreation otherwise the human grouping dies out, but when it is procreating to sustain its society, then it is dependent on communication to enable that society to function. Economics is an aspect of semi developed societies, development used there in the modern sense of the word as being good and that every human must be looking to the Protestant ‘west’ to follow their trajectory of individual rights, consumer goods, freedom to holiday and assume that ‘the State’ will sort everything out.

    If Budget Week in the ‘UK’ took a different tack to the political situation since WWII, which is an ever increasing funding of non societal healthy organisations and punitive screws tightened on those who provide the connective tissue in maintaining societal health, what could a very simple blueprint look like on the A4 piece of paper?

    Here follows an example, and not under copyright or IP, so plagiarism would be welcomed:

    Treat every one pound (coin) as money, regardless of whether it comes from employee work, self-employment, pensions and – and – benefits (all the many different benefits). That would automatically bring every human onto the same page and automatically bring a link to a citizen and governance, on a physical land area.

    Abolish the personal allowance, it is somewhere around £12,500, and that’s a lot of money (not for high net worth individuals but for the average man in the street). Abolishing that stress point between personal money and what the State is ‘taking’ would automatically refocus the modern obsession with individual rights away from person -v- State and back to the function of governance. It could also be a useful tool to test out an individual’s psychology in whether they believe in society in Britain or not.

    Completely rewrite Council Tax as not linked to the size of the house, the ‘mansion tax’ but linked to consumer load. The consumer load has a direct effect on the systems which a government and a Council has to run, like waste collection, education, care of the elderly, upkeep of buildings. An elderly person living in a large house, which was worth virtually nothing before the massive bubble in the ‘UK’ in the last few decades, but who uses very little electricity, does not put out a huge and heavy crate of alcohol bottles each bin collection (which costs massive energy to deal with), who knew that local society when there were libraries and community centres and children had no option but to be outside in all weathers with the resulting health which comes from that, and who uses very little water because they know that watering the lawn is a complete waste, that elderly person would pay very little Council Tax, maybe just £25 a month. The households which consume massively, destruct massively, and cost millions of pounds a year to the now Empire of Social Services, they would pay the top rate of Council Tax, which would be very high.

    So a three point blueprint: put a sliding scale from tiny to reasonable on every single pound (coin), abolish the personal allowance, and rewrite council tax to reflect the cost a household causes to the council jurisdiction. Easy!

  • Q: COP30…what has changed?

    A: The Earth has got hotter

    In the next few days the aeroplanes will be lining up to carry (not ferry, that was the only long distance transport before aeroplanes) the c.50,000 humans attending this COP back to their home nations, all around the spinning mass of rock which is Earth. No doubt there is great anticipation for the next COP when surely the solution to the crisis on Earth will be found, and of course another great gathering of talking around ‘the table’, hearing latest research, eating and drinking, and of course buying things from local traders to show support for the global market we all now inhabit. Probably no delegates will be walking home, except for the local Belem civic leaders, and that does not dent the c.50,000 who will be setting off, jetting off, in aeroplanes, disrupting the atmosphere and adding a great burden to the the crisis of the natural world, who does not use aeroplanes, or air con, or imported food and drink, or digital tech, or electrical appliances.

    If a quick sketch on the back of an envelope was made, and of which this writer is such a great believer and user of, of the balance of global causation of this crisis, how would this look? The indigenous peoples who do not consume out of their local area, and do not need fridges, cars, and who observe the dictatorship of Helios the whole year round, and of natural water supply and simple biology, they would be on the bottom line – in the doodle. Above that, in the middle band, how about dividing two categories of broadly speaking, the consumers and the producers?

    Because China and India did not appear at this party gathering, they are put as baddies, and of course the USA is nothing but a baddie for all the leftie leaning political and social media and young people in the west. So those two huge blocks of jurisdiction were not there, and no doubt have many black marks allocated to them for that. But if the picture was switched around and producers who are blamed for this increasing CO2 and all the rest of the measurable collapse were on the righthand side and it was the consumers who were on the left, so Consumers = Production, then where does the balance of crisis causation lie?

    Because within the atmosphere is really all one unit, so a rising temperature will eventually affect everything, because the natural world is not confined or contained within one jurisdiction’s opinion, or behaviour, where is this crisis generating? People will say ‘the Industrial Revolution’ and yes sure, it did set off some pretty unnatural processes, although the initial coal and steam industry was still very localised because of the manual work involved, by men, like shovelling coal into the engine of a steam train, or pulling coal up from deep underground, and using water at useful places where it was running downhill from gravity meant the power was already there to enable the industrial processes.

    Using electricity in industry was a different scale altogether, and a different scale of damage to the natural environment, which the human has only as its survival, just like all other species. But now, in the last few decades, the mating of industry and digital, well, if that is put alongside the measurable crisis to life conditions, surely the correlation is too clear to ignore.

    If the ‘bad’ producers were behind the = sign instead of in front as the causation, and not the west opinionating about who is doing the damage, if consumer power was the measure, where does that come from? Since New Labour opened universities to all, and with the result every local college, tech college, tiny institution and even uni’s which had never existed in any form sprang into existence in the ‘UK’ like mushrooms after a spring rainfall, how many air flights are taken each year ferrying, in the modern sense of that word, international students to and from the ‘UK’? How many giant container tankers full of goods are being transported from China each week to ….. not France or Portugal or Spain, but to the ‘UK’? How much food is produced in regions which need their water and manpower to survive themselves, into the ‘UK’ requiring masses of power for cold storage and preservation to ensure perfection in supermarkets? How many Brits are now taking several air flights a year to hot countries, or even to see the Arctic ice before the last snowflake melts? Beyond the Consumer = Producer equation there is even another quick sketched line above – the absolutely absurd. With the USA now facing really difficult questions about borders and consumption and some sense of responsibility coming back into view, is it the ‘UK’ which sits at the peak of the digital era pyramid, alone and absurd?

    If a global scientific conference cannot or will not start at the absolute baseline, what is the point? The baseline has not gone away and there is further to fall the higher we go. Modern belief in science and ‘human rights’ to have consumer goods of 2025 which many young people have only known in their lifetime, it does not change facts in any way, only increases the divergence. Even the Emperor must be saying now, ‘Guys, can’t you see, I have no clothes!!’ But that point has passed, until the big digital collapse, and then no one will be looking to another COP to save the world.

  • ‘In Poverty’ and the upcoming Budget

    Finance in the ‘UK’

    It is Budget time again, and the intricacies of big finance is way beyond this blog in both knowledge and interest. However, being a baseline blog, never far from the surface of Earth and always – always – with the framework of facts that all aspects of an individual human and a human society can only ultimately be within the overarching facts, that Earth is dependent on the Sun, in both gravity and Light/heat, and that the life zone is dependent on conditions and food and water within the atmosphere, without which none of us would exist.

    Within the political zone, many eyes focus onto that entirely man-made and the now even stranger modern construction of big finance, and the two-way flow of money into the government, and out again to the citizens in all the various services and complications of the modern ‘UK’.

    Finance now in the ‘UK’ is all about up, and preferably up and up. Those who are fascinated by profit and wealth and high net value and the lifestyle that comes with that are a big feature in the ‘UK’ over last decades, but so also is the equally opposite bottom of the ladder – as seen comparatively – of ‘the poor’, those ‘living in poverty.’ A government in power covers all rungs on that ladder (a ladder as seen by the western Protestant finance societal model but not the societal base for some countries on Earth, and not anywhere existing in the natural world), and Budget time is the focal point of all that, even for laymen like this blog. This blog is written from the wider context.

    Over the last 10 years from the observer’s point of view, two major sections of life or society, or opinion, have come fully into being. One is the expanding benefit system, expanding in different benefits and expanding in numbers claiming and which numbers now include people from all over Earth and their family networks from all over Earth with 100s of different cultures, languages, view of society, and view of the ‘UK’.

    The other is the prominence of identity to ‘be in poverty’ which from organisations like the Rowntree Foundation is all about a monetary value and how one person or family compares with the average or the top earners, it is probably more specific like that, but this is a general blog and will never misquote or plagiarise, but is often speaking in general terms. The fact is that poverty is clear if complete destitution is obvious, but societal poverty is related to all sorts of things, even apart from the new financial requirements of tech and online games and Netflix and all the various digital medias which require subscriptions, and of course pizza. The takeaway bill for pizza in the ‘UK.’ In the interests of being vaguely specific, a quick Google search just came up with £2.5-3 billion a year spent on takeaway pizza in the ‘UK’. That’s a lot of money.

    It is a fact that the current Labour government talk a lot about not only ‘women and girls’ but children ‘in poverty’ and the poverty being a reason for not attaining what politics is promising every young person. The life of a schoolchild deemed to be in poverty has some pretty good aspects to it, one being the amount of holiday activities paid for by Councils and private organisations contracting into Councils to be able to provide the outdoors activities, the psychological activities, the wellbeing and the giving the feeling that the children in poverty are just as loved as those who live in households deemed not to be in poverty.

    A radio news programme last weekend quoted the welfare bill in its entirety as spending in two weeks what the Defence budget spends in a year. If the social media wars are to be believed, the ‘UK’ is going to have to muster an army in the near future, so this massive imbalance between x26 spent on societal issues, much of which is illness against x1 of the Defence budget as viewed from an Earth – society equation does not look good. The Chancellor needs to raise money, and raise it fast, yet a large proportion of the citizens in the ‘UK’ do not pay any tax at all, yet consume so much resources in finance, health, education, and Council services.

    Ten years ago in a gathering, sort of political, but definitely a discussion event, the economist Richard Murphy was speaking and this blog typer and he had a discussion on tax, and that it would be a good idea for every adult citizen to pay tax, regardless of what the income was, benefits or earnings. It was only those two humans in the room who thought that was a good idea. Everyone else thought it would be very unfair, and not even thinkable. To this blog which is deeply interested in the long history of belief and income to outcome, all under the facts of Earth and Sun and gravity, then how a society not just is governed but how it relates to each other is ultimately a question of survival, even if the comfortable existence in the ‘UK’ these days does not think of actual survival.

    This writer has observed since, and still, that alignment of the citizen – money – tax, it could be said to only have become more relevant, because of the new scale of events, and the scale of the problems. Still the question remains, and if in reverse logic the Chancellor turned round the spotlight away from the demarcated sections of society and looked solely at the bottom line of an all inclusive group of citizens of the ‘UK’, with all income as just a monetary income regardless of source, then what better way of levelling up (levelling down) and inclusivity than creating a new financial framework of income – tax. This human said to Richard Murphy what if there was no Personal Allowance? Why is it needed? In 2025, why is the government not consulting the tax philosophers such as Prof Murphy to open the possibility of a rethink of this horrible impasse. If the tax bands applied to every citizen of adult age so those in receipt of small benefits

    If tax bands applied from the first £1, say 0.5p in the £1 and rising through the income levels for every single adult citizen, regardless of source of income, how would that change society? Society, this blog believes, has its own identity, or does in a healthy group of humans with more chance of survival than when it is missing. The x26 amount spent on benefits compared to Defence would then soon start to even out, but as important, the frameworks within society would be of citizens, not politically enabled identities. The ‘UK’ would not be seen as such an Eldorado, and those families living entirely on benefits would gain an understanding of how a society works and of how difficult it is to balance a life and governance.

    Equal to that, if all Councils ran a holiday programme for pretty much every week of school holidays, and across the devolved governments, that every child is out at activity and education camps regardless of income or the ‘being on benefits means poverty’ mentality, because it can be the reverse meaning those ‘in poverty’ get a distorted view of entitlement and that such wonderful activities are a part of fundamental rights. If each county Council was tasked with activating all children in every holiday, with a few days off for Christmas, doing all sorts of outdoor learning, physically tough regimes and sailing and woodworking, and in the spare time helping the Council with litter picking, painting fences, thinking about making flood defences, learning how to shear a sheep and skin a deer, fish, and make bread, and practice technical drawing, then with all their parents paying tax and all adults on the same page, all children on the same page, how much would that automatically reset this societal collapse happening?

    In the offices of government it must be so easy to just adjust a few technical systems, issue a few new documents, send out the new Directive to all Jobcentres and to HMRC, that simply, every pound of income is under the same incremental tax bands. And it would be so simple to bring the young citizens onto the same page, and all have the same opportunity to experience holiday activity. What would the balance of voters be? Many young people would be probably an automatic vote against any party that did that, but how many would feel a sense of relief that society could ease down and onto the same page, all citizens, instead of this strange antagonism of income and tax? It is not too late, and might even be a vote winner if the upcoming Budget introduced something really really simple.

  • COP……how many?

    ………30?

    It’s 2025 by the western calendar, and Belem in Brazil, at c.1.5’South in latitude ‘is hosting’ a vast global conference of c.55,000 (and a few more) scientists, politicians, journalists of course, experts, environmental speakers of all ages, intergovernmental orgs, non-governmental orgs, leaders from within Brazil honoured, or at least appearing to be, chosen as the venue for this global event, and somewhere in the mix …. c.3,000 indigenous peoples from all over the spinning mass of rock with the tiny little atmosphere zone around it which we call Earth will be at this global event, and feted with the title ‘Guardians of Biodiversity.’ They must be delighted.

    This blog is not counter culture. It is not written by a hippy. Far from it.

    Belem, a city of human society, and the capital city of the state of Para (apologies, this writer is not clever with tech so cannot put the right accent above the a there) is pretty much on the Equator. The Equator is the place at which Helios shines constantly, because the Earth being a spinning mass of rock in space but held by gravity into an orbit has its poles further away from Helios and at an angle therefore the Light of the Sun falls obliquely not directly. This creates vastly different climatic conditions over the surface of this mass of rock spinning in space. In 55-56’N this morning it is fairly cold (not nearly cold enough for the time of the seasonal year) and very wet. In Belem it is probably pretty hot, because being on or near enough the Equator is either hot and dry or hot and wet.

    The city of Belem as everyone knows is at the mouth of the river Amazon, that vast, really vast, wilderness of earth meeting water, the fertility and scale and complexity and sheer wonder that has arisen out of this mass of rock spinning in space with an atmosphere around it. Belem is not ‘on the Brazilian coast’ because humans in the past knew their geography and knew that the sheltered places were just up the river at a suitable point where boats could tie up and humans meet on the river bank, with walkable routes leading to and from that river point. So, just a few miles up the River Amazon is Belem.

    Belem, like many places on Earth, was a major centre for the colonial period when the natural resources were endless. The not mouth but delta system of the Amazon, because these geographies are vast and complex and only make sense from the overall scale, contains the salt water, the fresh water, the precipitation which comes down in humid regions, the unmeasurable biodiversity of the rainforest – forest with a lot of rain – the habitation of so many millions and billions of living creatures from the too tiny to see to the visible animals and birds and spiders and of course trees, those giant trees which produced the sap which was required for the growing production of western rubber requirements ….. and of course, living creatures of humans, who are now called in the Amazon, indigenous. Belem is called the ‘city of mango trees’ so it’s in the name, there are many many mango trees around the delta of the Amazon river.

    A mango is now a favoured western but there are two ‘mango’s.’ One is the native plant of the delta system of the Amazon, and is part of the infrastructure (to use a modern word) with its roots holding together the underlying complexity in that liminal zone of salt and freshwater, land and sea. The other mango is a cultivated plant giving those wonderful fruits, now combined with words such as ‘smoothie’ in the west. The trading port on the site of Belem, over thousands of years a network of small trading between those who could make boats (from scratch, of tree trunks and animal skins), did as history knows, come then under the Portugese government – or Crown as things were then – and the scale erupted into trans-Atlantic trade, either willing or enforced, but still only along certain trade routes and involving a very difficult sea journey over the Atlantic Ocean – by the Portugese it must be reminded, for they were the first to cross that vast stretch of water to establish trade goods, and yes, to use humans from the west coast of Africa to work the new plantations. Portugal is far south of c.55-56’N. But still, all travel was by land and sea, and did very, very, very little damage to the overall life conditions within the atmosphere of this spinning mass of rock in space. It did not damage, because it could not, the life zone around Earth was vast, self-regulating, and assisted greatly by regions such as the Amazon with its unmeasurable array of water and flora, land and sea. The so-called indigenous people in the region, living in the nature-dictated societal groupings of tribe, were not even divisible from their ‘environment.’

    Fast forward to 2025, and a very recent in history event under the umbrella of the United Nations, an organisation which has many arms going into government, health, migration, education, human rights, and every nebulous zone of society possible, now at COP30 has these c.55,000+ humans in a vast conference for 10 days, speaking about …. about what? Well, it’s obvious what they’re there for, it is to save ‘biodiversity’, because biodiversity is the modern research subject, and everybody knows there is a problem. To complete the loop, the 3,000 ish of indigenous peoples who are being flown in as exhibits, they will be given the feted reception (and again, there would possibly be an accent on that French word but is beyond this writer’s capability) of ‘Guardians of Biodiversity.’ Not ‘Champions of….’, no, that would be just too obviously mad. Mad, illogical, nonsensical, and utterly hypocritical, and probably would be refused by any unoffficial spokesman for those indigenous people who would not recognise what a ‘Champion’ was. ‘Guardians …’ yes, a clever term to offer them.

    As long as there are those ‘Guardians of Biodiversity’ sitting at this massive global event all is well. The loop is complete and the work has credibility. Everyone is there to try and ‘save the planet.’

    If COP30 is read through the reverse logic, and the vast and minute data of science and the natural world is reversed into basic facts of heat, water, food, should not a conference like COP30 publish the facts of its own event and publish how many flights were taken, how many different linking flights from origin to Belem, how many litres of water have been used by delegates attending COP30, how much power has been required for air conditioning to ensure the delegates don’t pass out in the humidity, how much food has been flown in (weight on planes adds fuel requirements), how much each hotel has been required to provide in facilities and local workforce who will be ‘let go’ after the delegates have (flown) home, and how much money will have gone into the preparation, event itself, and in dismantling all the conference apparatus, and including that from the protestors who have also flown there, and the indigenous who probably feel they could not refuse this new western domination, and ….. how much hot air has been produced?

    Leaving aside the irony of a global company called Amazon (which it must be stated this writer has never used as it saw the outset of how it decimated the book trade and then went on to decimate everything else which includes The Amazon delta), and in the interests of data, why is COP30 not required to include itself in this data machine of research and concern over the collapse of the survival-support of everything including humans? Should it not quanitfy the amount of water used which requires power to get it to come out of a tap, the amount of flights, the amount of CO2 added, the amount of money paid to get it all going fine, and above all, the degree of temperature rise that it has added?

    If the ‘Guardians of Biodiversity’ collectively made their end of conference statement as ‘Stop COP31’ would anybody believe they meant it? Would it be absorbed into another protest slogan and another ‘we listened to everybody’ in the roundup of the successful COP30, as delegates look forward to the next extravaganza. Short of a global power cut in the next big Solar Flare, is there anything now which can return humans to a reason and common sense?

  • The Vexed question of Vexillology – Part 3

    Vexillology = vexillum + logia

    Vexillology is not a historic subject of study, it was not in the Trivium of grammar, rhetoric and logic, and it was not the Quadrivium of arithmetic, geometry, music and astronomy.

    Vexillology as a distinct focus (and a focus is a looking towards, into, amongst something, not looking out and out and out)is pretty recent in history, though contains some finely focused minds, and here is the reference – https://fiav.org/the-origins-of-organized-vexillology/

    Because similar interests gravitate towards each other (gravity as the underlying principle of the whole of existence on Earth and without it where would we be?), within a few decades the focused interests had developed – https://fiav.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ICV20-28-Schmoger-The-Roman-vexillum.pdf

    In layman’s terms (the non-expert), the vexillum was the portable square red cloth hanging from a crossbar, so facing head on, therefore designed to be visible. Velum = sail in Latin. It was the only cloth flag of the Roman Empire and when there is only one, it is possible to define the meaning, or the message, or the point of it, or the function. The letters SPQR – Senatus Populusque Romanus – define a totality of geography, a place, governance, and citizens, but why would someone bother to go to the effort of making such an object? It was for military function, to define Roman jurisdiction and territory.

    The vexilloid, also a relatively recent term and from Whitney Smith, likewise did not create something new but the slightly different word defines the difference between the cloth flag and the staff with carved emblem. A vexilloid equally defines from within, and looking over the whole Earth (which a human cannot do, except through modern digital tech which is all going down at the next big solar flare) that symbol of a wooden staff with carved emblem and local relevance such as feathers is still a fundamental part of indigenous societies,

    The combination of language and physical objects arising from the ve – velum, the various vex’s, the focused knowledge within vexillology and the now Vexed question of Vexillology, are all from within the trajectory of the Roman Empire, to be still lodged within the ‘UK’, the further possible landmass (taking the Channel as not too hard to cross) of western Europe. In Europe we do not have vexilloids now, apart from ceremonial function of state and religion, and historical re-enactment societies, but we do have a lot of vexillums, as being a cloth on a pole.

  • The complications around royal sex

    The multi layered matter of Prince Andrew and Virginia Guiffre

    Global media now being mostly digital after the century or two of print media, (the newspaper purchased, unfolded and read), this week for regular citizens again it is Prince Andrew in the news because of the book of, or by, or about, Virginia Giuffre. There must have been other people in the meetups and the evenings at Tramp, with that name and maybe Annabel’s as well being the two, or two of the, places where a young lady looking for the highlife and rich men would have achieved that aim. And why not, because that is how society works and still works in the world of say football, where young men earning a small fortune each week have no shortage of females seeking their attention. It’s just life, isn’t it?

    Why is this so distorted the way Prince Andrew and Virginia Guiffre are taking the global digital media? If a young lady says she was sex trafficked then that is what she says, but surely there are so many more questions than that. One is the law, and what is the actual crime here? Under ‘UK’ law, the age of 16 is the legal age for consenting sex, and if someone – male, female, or anything in between – believes the other person is consenting then that is consent. If a two-week discussion was held then the moment would have passed, and that’s just sex isn’t it. Someone aged 16 is not breaking the law in the ‘UK.’ It is a different matter for gypsies, or travelling community under their new name, who still go on biology, and in biology males and females are in the reproduction or sex as leisure zone as soon as biology says so, and that’s probably about 12 or 13 in most cases, but ‘UK’ law does not apply to the travelling community. They conversely have protected rights, another anomoly of life in the ‘UK’.

    In this fevered climate of anti-Andrew, and the triumph of some females who have succeeded in getting his royal titles removed, it has to be asked, is this from the American love of all things British royal, and Andrew is seen as letting the golden image down where the royals can do no wrong? Or is it misanthropy at the most public? There is another question to ask, that as Virginia Guiffre wrote that she was trafficked, which implies duress and an almost hostage process and from just the news headlines over the year or so that reaches those of us who do not follow such things in depth the pair of Epstein and Maxwell were up to some pretty odd things, and that is the question of jurisdiction. Sorry about that long sentence, it might or might not make sense (dyslexia). In the USA the age of 16 is not legal to have sex, so surely this should be a matter for within the USA on the ‘underage’ question. It has become an America-royal family news level, but the actual legality surely is not underage in the ‘UK’, is underage in the USA?

    If the matter was turned round to also focus back down the line, even right back to the origin of the person, which is birth from two parents, childhood, etc., then the life of this unfortunate young lady was not very good all along, apparently. And in the natural world, the weak and unprotected are the ones likely to be consumed first by the predator (which in the natural world is a totally different thing, it contributes to overall health of the ecosystem, not detracts from it). In human society why is global sociology and media only going one way?

    The unfortunate young lady apparently had a bad father, and when there is a bad parent (male or female it has to be said), that weakens life for thereon, and can never fully be rectified. So, the fact she had a difficult life makes the story all the more emotive. However …. one thing is missing, and that is the mother. Where was she in all this? And in this global interconnectivity, why could a call not be made from the young lady to her mother to say she was in difficulty, and could she help get her out of it and back to the USA?

    News coverage has also been in the ‘UK’ in events of Rochdale, in a different level of social class, but these are all similar questions if seen from a wider focus. Why can the ‘UK’ and the USA not look the other way and ask what is so fundamentally and tragically wrong with society that these situations arise at all? It is a valid question to ask.

  • Don’t bite the hand that funds you – at any price…

    Collapse of the Chinese spy case at the highest level in the UK

    Firstly the referencing. The phrase ‘Don’t bite the hand that funds you’ comes from one chapter of a book in the 1990s when this human was a low-key journalist and the book was to be reviewed. The title of the book could not be found but the title has stuck in its head since then as being clever, one of those phrases which dances this way and that, obviously from ‘don’t bite the hand that feeds you,’ and yet – and yet – saying so much more. Feeding is physical food. Funding is a whole different zone, and to be advised to not bite that hand that funds, well, the zone merely increases in complexity. This blog has added the phrase – at any price… And in this cut and paste world, here the referencing is made to best of ability, and intention does still speak for itself.

    So if the above phrase was applied to events in the last few days in the ‘UK’, where a case against two men suspected of spying for China was ready for action by the CPS, the Home Office and MI5, all the background preparation in place and in big legal cases that means a lot of work and a lot of documentation yet in the reverse of the straw that broke the camels back, the highest governing power in the land (of the ‘UK’) refused to tick the box to set the case rolling.

    This blog is interested in how humans organise themselves, how their societies are structured under the simple fact of Helios, Earth and gravity, with the requirement of food, water and shelter for survival. “Friend or foe?” until recently (and the last 50 or 100 years are a mere blink of time) used to be clear, or easy to determine after just a few steps, and the status would be measured from within a perimeter of governance. The jurisdiction of the territory was clear, and the jurisdiction of the surrounding and further territories also a clear definition. “Friend or foe?” would be towards a viable entity, whether a person or a society. Viable in biology means living, viable in the English language means something a bit different.

    This last week could not be a clearer portrayal of the abysmal state of affairs in the ‘UK’ of 2025. The office of the Prime Minister as the highest point in government/governance was the one in this case who collapsed the dominoes back down the line, yet a high level legal case involving state security and the implications of international espionage would be expected to have all the force of every power in the land to keep that exterior strong.

    Probably not much food comes from China, apart from the eons old trade of real food for real Chinese people, and the now millions of Chinese students in the major (and minor) universities, all of whom are seen to be carefully shopping, communicating in their own language, usually Mandarin, cooking together, and taking their studies very seriously. In the city centres of London, Edinburgh, Newcastle, Manchester… the Chinese supermarkets are full of goods a Chinese person knows how to use. And the Chinese takeaways, they are still an integrated part of many cities and towns. So that is food from China, but apart from that, fresh food is not really a big commodity coming into the ‘UK’. Not like the fruit and vegetables and so much else arriving from many parts of the world, using their water, disrupting the networks, even New Zealand is turning over its land to grow more vines for wine, to transport the heavy bottles all the way to the ‘UK.’

    That is why the phrase, ‘Don’t bite the hand that funds you,’ which as said earlier came from a book chapter in the 1990s, just says it all. If like a biological dye which is tracked through veins and arteries the finance originating from China was run through the manufacturing, university, utilities, technology, household consumer, medical and scientific networks in the ‘UK’ how would it be possible to make one clear statement that ‘China is a threat’? A threat to what? A threat to national security requires a clear recipient and there is none.

    In a strange contortion of reality, the case collapse of the last week appears as an inversion of the principles of survival. A threat to the national survival and security of societal existence would be if the entire Chinese network of finance in the ‘UK’ disappeared. The cost of biting that Chinese hand which funds us is not even contemplatable because there is now no way of asking who is friend and who is foe. It would be more honest of the Prime Minister if he declared the ‘UK’ a vassal state of China. The Treaty of Nanking was only in 1842, a mere 180 or so years ago, when clear lines of ethnicity, national governments, climatic zones, culture and language were taken as the baseline of human societies, and power of governments showed as a very clear line, as the Chinese government well remember after the imposed Treaties by the British and the French (and the French).

    What a bizarre state of affairs this is in 2025.

  • Autism: The Debate over Diagnosis

    Autism is in the headlines again, as it does periodically, and alas always from the negative viewpoint. A viewpoint is the point of view of the opinionator, and the point from which it is viewed is the opinion itself. The opionator directs its opinion at the subject, which in this case is autism – again.

    It was President Trump, who so often speaks so much common sense, cuts to the point, sets the ball rolling, puts it up in the air and for so often most people to say, well, there is some truth in that. And as this blog is interested in the measurement of anything and everything to the baseline facts – which are Helios, Earth, gravity, and the tiny life zone around our spinning planet – the matter of societal leadership of life forms within this life zone is of great interest to this writer. However, it was President Trump who last week spoke of the problem of the increasing rate of an autism diagnosis.

    Yes, it is a fact that the rate of diagnoses have increased exponentially, in both the USA and the ‘UK’. However, just an elemental kind of analysis of this must ask the basic question of is it that more and more people are ‘catching’ autism, this awful disease as described by those whose viewpoint is that autism is entirely negative? If so, then the cause for this change must be found, as believed by those people, and negated, so as to avoid people getting autism, or coming out of the womb as autistic, when they wouldn’t have been before. It has been a long time that people have been looking for the cure to make sure these odd people don’t hold back society any longer in its rush to the promised nirvana. Autistic people are not much fun to be around, don’t see the point of selfies, and don’t contribute much to the economy in pointless Valentine merchandise and daily takeaway pizzas. So far no cure, only the reverse apparently, more and more people ‘are getting autism’.

    Taking a different viewpoint, looking from a different perspective, and putting this question back into the fundamental facts of human society living in the life zone which is the tiny, tiny little space around Earth, which is governed by Helios and gravity, then it is a valid question to ask how do we know there are more people ‘catching autism’, and that it isn’t more a question of societal changes? When a landslide happens, the topography changes and the habitat is not as before, and many many lives are disrupted – from earthworms to birds to snails to mammals to bacteria, to water life, and of course the humans. If a river dries up, on which societies of humans and other life forms depended for centuries, all along a long length from source to estuary, then there is huge disruption of normal societal balances, much crisis and stress, and the disruption is apparent because of the loss of the underpinning of existence.

    What if the same principles are put into the last few decades of western civilization which in this case is the Protestant (in the general sense) band of the ‘UK’ and the USA, not the Catholic countries of Iberia, Gaul, underneath the Germanic countries, into Poland and eastern Europe, and back around Italy and the Mediterranean islands? This increased rate of diagnosis in the ‘UK’ and the USA is the subject of this debate, all from the point of view that it shows a problem going on, which must be found, eradicated, and then the autistic people will also disappear. What if the problem turned round and asked the societies and government, why is it taking away the habitat of the autistic folks? This is using autism in the general sense, not the difference between us autistics and the Aspergers, who call themselves Aspies and get on well together, have different motor skills, often say they feel lonely, and gravitate towards social integration. We all have great difficulty with sensory overload, and a few other similarities, so this post doesn’t need to turn into a 5,000 word essay on the difference between Aspies and us autistics.

    Even to a few decades ago there was a rich habitat for autistic people, healthy biodiversity in society, civic life, libraries, education, real science with eyes and brain before the data age, small scale railways, government at regional council and national level, even after Tony Blair introduced the not at all thought out devolution of parliaments to various parts of the ‘UK’ there was a healthy habitat for autistic people. Turning that round, it can be said as pretty much a fact, that a healthy society depends on people who care about systems, structure, well regulated organisations, that children have access to informative projects in libraries, that civil servants work without ego but just doing the job of regulating and enabling and checking, and that those who have a particular ability and aptitude in certain areas are pointed in that direction and left to it, without being in a petri dish of researchers and data. It used to be such, and the point is that it really did. The autistic people were seamlessly woven into the fabric of society, and even if people would think they were just a bit odd in the lack of social flair and desire for self publicity, even then it would not be anything like a problem to society itself, because most autistic people were very useful in society.

    Now the fabric of society has been collapsed, the autistic children who would once have had shelves of books, musical instruments, steady careers as a clerk or a piano tuner or a librarian or a teacher (of certain subjects) or the reliable council worker or the so many other aspects of a society, now have only a strange world of schools built of modern materials which bang and echo, no windows that open, chaotic lessons where most are on their smartphones, flipping through images which autistic people just don’t get, modern lighting which really, really hurts our eyes, and a relentless focus on the emotional, the wellbeing, the individual experience, which for us autistics is a real nightmare and panic, because we simply do not put ourselves forward like that. So, instead of asking why is autism on the increase, why not ask why is society causing so much stress to autistic people? Maybe it is the stress that is being diagnosed, not a diagnosis ‘finding a new autistic person.’?

    So, if President Trump wants to lessen, or eradicate the problem of autism, the simplest way of all would be to put back all the facets of society in which autistic people thrive, and often underpin in their reliability. If real books, real building of stone or wood, real food, real lighting of minimal and old fashioned light bulbs, and windows that open were introduced into all towns and cities, and the strange obsession with individual feelings and expression and being respected was just quietly shelved, then maybe the ‘new’ autistic children would soon be part of the natural habitat, in our often genetic lines of autism and which was able to contribute so very much to society in the past. From the viewpoint of humans functioning in the life zone, on Earth, the function of the autistic is really really necessary, and as the litmus test of a healthy society for all, to mark it on the autistic line of functioning, well, just how much stress would that reduce for the rest of society as well? Probably a lot.

  • The Vexed Question of Vexillology – Part 2

    What is a flag?

    It is an easy question. It is a piece of fabric, usually rectangular, somewhere in the scale of 18ins to 4 feet long so in the scale of Earth this is really tiny, and attached to the top of a pole. If it was just the fabric without the pole, and people ran around with them, it would not be called a flag. If the fabric rectangle was stuck up on a fence or a doorway, it would be called a banner. And if it was a long rectangle and carried by several people along a routeway, it would still be called a banner.

    Still a flag is not just a piece of fabric on a pole. It has to have both those, but it is the fabric which defines what the flag is. Now the word can be used as in ‘flagging someone down’ when someone waves their arm at the side of the road, and the car stops. Or, ‘flagging it up,’ when we need to highlight something, pull it out and get it into focus, and usually means that there’s a problem, great or small, but in this way of usage it is something that needs flagging up, it needs some attention, through to need for fixing a problem before it becomes really apparent.

    A flag, the object itself, is all about the fabric – not the fabric of linen, silk, cotton, though that is necessary because it isn’t possible to make a flag of wool, you don’t knit flags, but the reason for the flag. The flag is sending a message, stating facts, defining and demarcating, in about the most precise and specific way, which is why they are flags. Even more profound, the physical symbol of the flag – which is both pole and fabric – speaks its message either by a blank colour, like white or red, or by a vast array of different images and colour arrangements.

    So, a flag is a micro of a macro, but as in all alignments and axes (plural of axis), there’s no pick ‘n’ mix, no mix and match, no one size fits all. Oh no. A flag is a micro of a clearly defined realm, and the entirety of that macro fits perfectly into the few feet of fabric on a pole.

  • The Vexed Question of Vexillology – Part 1

    Or, the reasons, rationale and reappearance of flags in the ‘UK’.

    As 2025 has unfolded, so have many flags, or the word is probably unfurled for a flag, but however it is said, flags have reappeared in 2025 as centre stage. Vexillology is big, but not many folks would know the word, but everybody knows what a flag is.

    This blog, being written by an autistic human, of course in the network of autistic humans there is now and again a human will know every single flag of the world and can prove that within a few seconds, but possibly the identification of flags does not come under Vexillology as such, or maybe forms a subsection of its own within the overall subject area of Vexillology.

    In observing this increasing appearance of flags in the ‘UK’ in 2025, and as this blog is written entirely from the measurement of Helios to Earth to gravity, this reappearance of such physical statements raises so many curious angles. Is there a word of Vexillolosophy? Probably not, but the philosophy of the study of the history and societal position of flags is not really allowed to be discussed in these modern times, and is that because it links back through the jurisdiction of borders, through religion, conflicts, definition, and all of those do ultimately link back, whatever the viewpoint (point-of-view has to link back also to physical) of the human in these multitude of social, political, religious, global, technological and science fictional beliefs in the public realm of today.

  • The Logical Cycle of Seasons

    Last week in a medium sized shop in the mid latitudes of the British Isles, a human checked along the signs hanging above the aisles, and headed into Seasonal Aisle to buy some wooden fence protector. Imagine the surprise when that aisle contained nothing but chocolate, piled high and low and deep, and in so many boxes and packets and bags and specially made little houses and really eye catching words, designs, colours, bits of glitter, but basically the same ingredients of cocoa mass, cocoa butter, sugar, and milk, give or take a few boxes of dark. And of course, the Season is Christmas.

    Last week was August, today the month turns to September, and for us pagans who notice such things, the Autumn Equinox, Alban Elfed, is still three weeks away. Christmas, which does not exist in either Earth, Helios, or the natural world, but certainly does in the western world for the last two thousand years, is still another three calendar months after that, neatly slotted into that most profound time of year when the tiny baby Light of Helios is born again. From today, the seasonal food now taking up a lot of space in all medium to large supermarket type shops in the UK is for a date about four months away = one third of a solar year. That’s a long time.

    Outside in the still evidence natural world, the blackberries are large and sweet in sunny patches, and many many more ripening to be there for the picking over the next few weeks. Those who know their mushrooms know what this time of year brings, this human only trusts knowledge of a puffball but there are the mycophagists who know what and where to pick in this liminal seasonal zone where the beautiful and bountiful harvest is given. Nuts and berries, and all the cultivated fruit and vegetables of this climatic zone, and which once upon a time would have been a very busy time of preserving and stewing and pie making and jam making and sloe gin pricking and the primitive pleasure of eating a ripe fruit or vegetable straight off the stalk.

    The market, still so much a part of society in much of Europe and especially the Catholic regions of ‘the west’ where supermarkets are still pretty much unchanged over the last few decades appear to exist only to provide what the market really cannot, while the real food goes on in those markets where real food meets real people. Solar time is the definer, the regulator, the arbiter, and like a dial around reality, the market revolves throughout the year, and the work of local producers forms a seamless process through the markets and into the homes of humans who delight in that correlation with ultimately Solar time.

    If the government in the ‘UK’ thought about rebalancing the fragmented links between humans and Earth, and from there of food and water, it could pass a law to say every retail outlet apart from the very small, would have a Seasonal aisle, 365 days a year, with local suppliers all having a little stall, like a real old covered market in the fine towns of the mid latitudes, and which are closing year on year, no trolleys allowed down that aisle because there wouldn’t be room, and money paid directly, in cash, to each producer.

    Farmers markets we have, and unfortunately have become something of a lifestyle symbol, unfortunate as those rows of stalls really do reflect Solar time, while most just load a trolley in the supermarkets and never would visit a farmers market for all sorts of reasons. If the government mandated, passed a supermarket law, requiring one aisle as a local seasonal produce, with the stall holders paying something to overheads but only a small part because they are not part of the supply chain or fraught relations with their suppliers, because they are the suppliers of their own goods.

    Then the seasonal aisle of last week, in August, to encourage a four month buying binge on chocolate before the event of Christmas, would have to rename itself because the real seasonal would be the line up of local produce. It’s a strange situation in the ‘UK’ because to put up a sign saying Christmas aisle in August would have customers startled at the incongruity, even exclaiming Christmas just gets earlier every year, yet that is what it is.

    Solar time has no guises, nature has no way of doing anything other than what it is and for the purpose of the life force itself. To be inside the seasons of Helios and completely sustained, or outside in the shiny wrappings of western time, Halloween horrors soon to come, Christmas, Valentine’s Day, Easter, summer alcohol discounts, before Christmas appears again, will there be a government able to bridge this existential gap.

  • Wars on the World Stage

    The many wars and many opinionators in 2025 CE on the World Stage

    In this month of August 2025 there are so many wars going on in the human world that most of them do not make the BBC headlines anymore, although from the position in geo-graphy, events are always real, whether or not the press of the world is there.

    Within the life zone, that tiny weeny little slither of habitable life around the mass of Earth, as it spins on its own axis around the Sun, which is the giver of all the fundamentals of our existence, which are an earth to live on, held in place by gravity, and the Light which activates life itself, within the life zone, the organisms which still adhere to logic are also at war. Every living being defends its territory, fights to the death if necessary over food and water, and to protect its next generation, and eats from the same world it inhabits, thereby squaring the circle and not doing any damage at all to the overall balance of survival for the life zone as a whole. Apart from the business of eating from within the allotted parameters, which involves all parts of the food chain consuming living beings, and even grass although not itself a consumer of organisms is still within the vast and extraordinary interplay going on, even if in such reduced circumstances because of the human activity, the natural world consumes and is consumed all within its allotted radius. An eagle will cover more miles (the right kind of air miles) than a snail, but it all makes sense when the focus is taken back into the overview. As every living being needs somewhere to be that life, place is so obviously a part of the equation that it doesn’t even need to be said. And the more complex the being, the more the word territory is applicable, because territory is different to habitat – habiter in French, and habitation as being more the place itself.

    The word territory is not habitat and territory probably once was also from the French, terroir, maybe, this writer is not a linguist but does speak reasonable French and its surprising just how many words have lost their real meaning when entering the realm of English. But back to territory in the western civilization meaning, and territory comes with the reality of a jurisdiction which stops at the edge of that territory, in law, culture, language, still a general ethnicity, yes we can say that even today, and definitely an element of defence, because the next territory is exactly that, a different territory. That is about as normal as could be isn’t it, even with the strange development of human society over the last few thousand years.

    Something stood out strange and clear this week as the two major wars going on in August 2025 – Gaza/Israel and Russia/Ukraine – have been in great detail in world news. A few days ago France became the first G7 country to speak of recognising a/the state of Palestine. The ‘UK’, which supplies weapons to Israel and says its needs the income and jobs that creates, got a surprise and joined the debate, like many other countries did. The ancient lands of the eastern Mediterranean are long lost in how geo-graphy would mark out human societies, and now these lands are under the gaze of the modern media. The same week has the Russia/Ukraine events under the spotlight of talks and leaders travelling and discussing, with again no clear questions or answers, just as no regional war has any clear sense when run through the global opinions. The occupation of Eire is long forgotten, and these two big conflict areas stand in giant testimony to western politics of the C.21.

    The writing of Gaza/Israel was deliberate rather than Israel on Gaza, because in these two current public conflicts, it was the action of Hamas taking the hostages which begun this intense and disastrous conflict, and some of those hostages are still under the capture of Hamas. Russia/Ukraine likewise, Russia did invade Ukraine, with one reason given to protect the Russian humans in the Donbas. The volume and heated opinions of humans around the western world on these two conflicts shows something quite illogical about actual war, in which humans naturally engage, just as does every other active life force, for natural reasons of survival.

    The visceral hatred in discussion held far away from both war zones, and by people who have never been and never will be going to those regions, is astonishing. And at a governmental level, the desire to put as right and wrong, the good one and the baddie, has probably come from watching too many films. With the leader of Russia the shorthand for the baddie these days, and paradoxically the Hamas leaders who planned and carried out the taking of Israeli hostages being separated in the western eye from the people themselves of Palestine who are now seen as aggressed by Israel, with the reason for that catastrophic military action lost from significance as people line up on either pro Palestine or pro Israel, and everything brought down to the pure personal impression of seeing such a disastrous chain of events unfold. If instead of recognising the state of Palestine, all the western leaders gathered together and made a collective statement that first the remaining hostages are to be returned to Israel, what would happen? Alas even such a statement shows how un-localised and how un-geo-graphical the human world is these days, as to why the so many wars are also fought in the opinion levels and news reporting levels, as if they themselves were impacted.

    If everyone who had an opinion also had to make a brief list of what their interests were, if any, how different would it make the major conflict zones look? If the ‘UK’ government had to list just how many resources are used from Ukraine from electronic parts, auto parts, sunflower oil, and probably so many other just below the surface parts of the crazy global movement of production and now complete dependency. How much of the opinion on a war by a government is actually self protection to ensure its highly unnatural dependency on resources thousands of miles away is not disrupted, otherwise its citizens will be fed up and will not vote them in again next time? When emotion is overlaid by the western powers on who is the victim and who the aggressor, how would it ever be possible to come to a solution when the world stage has become the arena, instead of a geo-graphically defined region in the crisis of war, and which has been a fundamental shaping of human history since the indigenous tribes post the last glacial were gradually replaced by humans measuring further and further away from their logical place on Earth.

  • The logic of leadership and sexuality

    In Nicola Sturgeon’s Memoirs, for e.g.

    In the past few days radio waves in Scotland have given some air time to discussing the matter of sexuality in the Memoirs of the recent leader of the SNP. The Memoirs are written because Nicola Sturgeon was the leader of Scottish politics, in the utterly chaotic political situation of the ‘UK’ after Tony Blair, it could be argued, did not give quite enough thought to the implications of devolution as being neither here nor there.

    Apart from the politics, and apart from police action on SNP finances, the real question being discussed by the airwaves this human heard were really focusing on that question of heterosexual sex between a man and a woman, and homosexual sex, between two women which has been around during Nicola Sturgeon’s leadership. It is quite ironic really that in Scotland, the land of the progressive, individualistic, free thinking, be whatever you want to be, endless opportunities and the funding to find from somewhere – without having to be too specific before the policies are rolled out – and with the existing legal matters going on about what exactly is a woman, why on earth has such a minor question become so publicly important as heterosexual or bisexual? You would think that in these times of intentional blurring of all boundaries that the matter of what is actually quite natural – because it is found in the natural world amongst some animals, and in the recent decades for now both males and females, that such a basic and accepted identity would not raise more than a slight eyebrow.

    Of course it would in some hard line religious adherents, and Scotland still has a lot of the kirky folks who are never slow to show the opinion, by look or word, anything other than heterosexual and preferably in a stable marriage is acceptable. And many immigrants of Islamic or the black Christian churches now in the UK are absolutely no go on any variations of the man and woman marriage. But in the modern era Scotland of today, with Glasgow and Edinburgh as the new party places and with the serious legal confusions over bio-logical (logical biology written backwards), why is this matter of the sexuality of Nicola Sturgeon something which required her to address in her Memoir? This writer has not and will not be reading it, but just on the periphery, it is a valid question to ask why this focus on something which was quite a few years ago absorbed into daily life for many.

    The fact that the lover was a French female diplomat is only mentioned as an add on, but is this not an illogical way around? The role of a leader is to protect its people, land, resources, ensure a solid perimeter, or it used to be, and although this is not the situation now in the ‘UK’, either internally or externally, a leader still stands in the realm of other leaders, not with us plebians. If the question of the relationship that has been floating around for a while was of a man and woman, would that be seen any differently? The different relationship of Scotland with France in times of olde, with both against England, has been lost in nowadays apart from historical re-enactments and cultural links, while the jurisdictions place Scotland and England in the UK, even with Roman law in Scotland and Common law in England and Wales, and the different education structures of the two, the ‘UK’ umbrella is not in the EU, while France, for the meanwhile, remains EU.

    So, if a leader of the governing Scottish party was bisexual, and had a relationship with a French diplomat, what is the relevance, if any? Is France friend or foe? That’s an ambivalent question for British politics, and if friend, then a liaison could not do too much damage. If foe, then all sorts of suspicions arise. With all the comment focused on whether the possible relationship was two women, never has this writer heard any discussion on the wider question of liaisons where both hold a great deal of state knowledge. Is someone padding around opening drawers, or nowadays flicking through a phone or laptop? Are French-UK relations that suspicious? Probably not. The suspicion of the UK is turned further eastwards nowadays. If there was a relationship – hypothetically let’s say – would that be a problem in the realms of state security?

    Unfortunately with the loss of jurisprudence and reasoning in the UK political, legal, social, economic, just about every area now, the realm of governance and leadership as been reduced to as personal, as emotional, as unrelated as possible to a leader. The French, even with the horrendous case of recent times involving sexual practice, still the French have a way more practical attitude to the pyramid of life. The baseline is the physical things in life, and to be maintained, and the philosophy and reasoning and public offices able to perform their function without being put through the personal mill. Maybe it is because the baccalaureate curriculum ensures that school children are studying a variety of subjects right up to leaving school, and to have a 16 or 18 year old able to study philosophy, or some structure of thinking and discussing, it creates a different society to this morass of the personal in 2025 ‘UK’.

  • Leaders of nations, Leaders of tribes

    President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin

    In the current times where conflict is everywhere it seems, what’s in a name? The two men above are both Presidents of their respective jurisdictions, and both are often shortened to ‘Trump’ and ‘Putin’.

    For this blog, which measures human activity to the baseline facts of Helios, Earth, and gravity, these times of complete and utter chaos in the human realm of the life zone on the planet called Earth are very illuminating. There is the western world, under the general umbrella of Christendom, and within that the overall division of Catholic and then all the variations which have come about since the 1500s, and the western world looks out onto the Middle East and China, which it could be said really generally still hold their own place as not being under Christendom or Empire. Sure the west drew lines through the Middle East with the resulting chaos now, but in belief and practices, still it can roughly be said that China and the ‘Middle East’ still maintain their own identity.

    Where does that leave the northern latitudes? Scandinavia is seen as sort of pure, uncomplicated, practical, not the region which is generating this catastrophic dimming of the life zone, And Canada also, the great outdoors, vast wilderness, and any stresses between French and English are far over in Quebec. But in between those two is the might Russia, and this last week of news headlines is raising a question which this human finds deeply interesting.

    The zone of conflict between Ukraine and Russia on a map is a fairly small area compared to the measurement of the land mass of Ukraine, and definitely a small area of the land mass of Russia. Information states that some in the conflict zone are Russian in heritage and language, and wish to be back within the perimeter of Russia. The fairly small conflict zone, to which most non Ukrainians or Russians have never been, is writ large on the agenda of the west, especially Britain who has been opinionating way above any functional ability.

    The really useful thing about Donald Trump being the President of the USA is that a top down measurement is now placed in the western world, and of course therein lies the dividing line between those who hate him and those who admire him. For the point of view of this blog, the increasingly complicated conflicts are increasingly complicated because the baseline of Earth is not considered relevant anymore. And if it is, quickly the terms populist, racist, radicalised, extreme right wing are thrown about, because politics has so completely removed itself from Earth itself.

    The two Presidents, of the USA and of Russia, are providing the clearest illumination on what is a leader, and on the different realities within the human zone in 2025. President Trump has spent several days in the mid latitude of Britain, from where this blog is physically written into the entirely tenuous digital realm (dependent on electricity, and which will disappear in a second along with the rest of digital tech at the first big Solar flare). This juxtaposition of the last week, with President Trump here, within latitude 55′-56’N, from where this writer inhabits, and ‘here’ because his ethnicity is half Scottish. He is also half German, which is not a million miles from the sites he visited, yet he is President of the USA, a vast land mass, until a few hundred years ago the lands of native tribes, as was all of Earth until a couple of thousand years ago, give or take some larger groupings in the Euphrates region and in what is now called South America. But all measured fully to Earth. Where else would they measure? And President Trump is certainly a leader, performing the role of a leader, and cutting through the bloated democratic west with the return of simple one liner facts. But he is still the President of a jurisdiction within the ‘west’, the major power of the ‘west’ actually, and it is the ‘west’ that engages and opinionates with the USA.

    President Putin, now put as the one obstructing peace in Ukraine, is again the bad boy, even though it is said both men get on pretty well, which they would do, being both leaders in personality and ability. So, why this public impasse? Why has President Donald Trump found himself in this position of being unable to bring an end to the war in Ukraine? This blog is looking at governance from the baseline of Earth, which is governed by Helios and gravity, and so this last week has been endlessly fascinating. The question of where does power arise is in nature not something the participants have to ask or analyse, because it arises from within the life zone. The questions the two Presidents have to ask themselves are showing as either side of this line. President Putin only answers to the land and the people of the land, whereas President Trump answers to the land of America, but which is organised within the beliefs and practices of ‘the west’, and which is not ultimately measured to the land but to the zone of politics, and with that global trade, global movement of people, a dumbing down through the use of English as the common language, and the firm belief that digital tech will create a nirvana. Russia on the other hand, never does not believe that it is not land. If that sounds Irish (and it might do because this writer has quite a lot of Irish in it) that is meant to say that a Leader from the Land has less questions to ask and answer, because the land itself asks and answers the questions.

    The impasse between the two Presidents is illuminating, and although the role of a leader is top down in every sense, it is the leader of a land who has the advantage of a pyramid base arising from geography while the leader arising from a western development of 500 years has only the top down. In this historical juncture with President Trump reasserting the need for clear jurisdictions and the welcome (for some of us) shake up that has been, who holds the cards in ‘a solution for the Ukrainian situation’? Will geography reassert itself, as the ultimate definer and arbitrator? Can another power ever successfully solve a regional zone, in which the ‘UK’ has its own going on that is for sure, and can one latitude arbitrate for another, one latitude which lives by heating and large appliances, while Russian latitudes can go all winter without heating and the ease of modern living. It’s a curious equation when the powers which criticize Russian leadership are dependent on buying the energy which is taking down the life zone, and the leader of the USA who is acting like a leader amidst the detritus of democracy ideals is the product of Scottish and German fortitude, along the same latitude, but born into the western realm which is now so truncated from geo-graphy. Who will prevail in the Ukraine situation? On the world as now a stage, it is revealing the baseline again, which has never changed.

  • Nuclear equality?

    A Logical Blog asking Logical Questions

    The Equality of no Nuclear. Over the early months of the year 2025 by the Gregorian calendar, President Trump raised the subject of nuclear weapons, saying, ‘There’s no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many. You could destroy the world 50 times over.’

    In February statements spoke of America, Russia and China, and the idea of nuclear arms control, and that was said from the American President, not from Russia and China, but it was put out there. Where is ‘out there’? Well, that is into the modern digital tech world, entirely dependent on electricity from big power stations down to the i-phone charger, and without which nothing now would run, not that world leaders consider that real baseline.

    But out there it was stated, and then in early March President Trump told reporters that he was in favour of denuclearization amongst global powers. That would be the global powers who ‘have nuclear’, being the nine of America, China, Russia, France, the ‘UK’, North Korea, Israel, Pakistan and India.

    The nuclear spectre raised its head as Pakistan and India faced each other, the world held its breath, which of course is a meaningless term because the natural world never follows news events on a digital screen and it is only the human stuck is this strange in between, and President Trump again took the role of a leader and some talking was done, and the nuclear button was not pressed over on the complicated border region between Pakistan and India. Phew.

    Now the matter of nuclear weapons has swung the other way, not among the top dogs in the global realm who have this nuclear facility, but looking down the ladder, the same President Trump took on Iran with a smaller than could have been missile lobbed over, and Iran responded with a smaller than could have been, and possibly the heat was taken out of the explosive situation, for the time being. That’s clever leadership tactics too, because leaders should be engaging with each other in that mixture of talking for mutual benefit or engaging in a kind of thinking martial arts tactics because leadership is a difficult role, and for us masses, it is none of our business to sit and opinionate all day when we don’t have any responsibility.

    This blog is not an opinion but a measurement, and as the question of nuclear arms has appeared in these various ways in the first half of this year, it would be a very good idea to freeze the frame and keep both directions on view, before they sink beneath the daily new events in this tragic human world. As 9 countries have nuclear weapons, and they are meant to be a deterrent, why should Iran not have one, or a few, too? The west says nuclear weapons aren’t safe in countries not part of the civilized western world, and already views North Korea as somewhere far out on the fringes of inclusion. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent should not every jurisdiction have a nuclear? Then it would be an equal safety for all.

    Looking the other way, up the ladder, to return to President Trump’s radical statements on denuclearisation made only a few months ago, will this be the paradigm missed in the modern era? If, on paper, a little diagram was doodled of the lower orders, seen as mad, bad and dangerous and who must at all costs be prevented from gaining these dangerous nuclear facilities, up through the perceived order of things to the major powers who believe they and their nukes hold the balance of peace, why can we not start at the top line instead of the bottom line?

    As the ‘UK’ gears up to invest more in missile and arms manufacture, and talks of security in this dangerous age, yet at the same time relies on manufactured goods from all those countries who come in for the stinging criticism from the pious ‘UK’, and as gun boats were despatched to the Channel Islands to scare France, not so many years ago over fishing questions, the existence of nuclear weapons designed to obliterate the enemy only stands like a great towering mountain, brooding over the daily life below.

    If President Tump followed though on his statements given out a few months ago on denuclearization amongst the global powers, what would the world look like, the human world that is? Or rather, if it was followed through to actual denuclearization? If no country has any nuclear weapons the top slice of stress would be evenly sliced off, the line brought down evenly instead of the see-saw reactions and this Russian roulette of friend or foe. If all jurisdictions were nearer ground level and the nuclear deterrent became a nuclear equality of no one has nuclear, how much aggravation would evaporate in international relations?

    It would a really good weekend event if the leaders of the 9 met for a serious chat. Are we going to actually use a nuclear? If not, just come down and start the dismantling process. Such a move would show that global co-operation is possible, and maybe the best proof of all, and really there’s nothing to lose because no world leader would really want to go down in history as the one who pressed the button, not that anyone would know about it anyway after that, but still…not great if there is any posterity. But if a summit of 9 came out and announced that hereinafter the line of this towering aggravation will be now calmly taken down quite a few notches, what is there to lose? And there would be a lot to gain.

  • A Logical Blog

    Trump -v- Iran – a Disaster Day for Logic?

    Trump -v- Iran on Summer Solstice 2025 – a Disaster Day for Logic? What on Earth has happened this weekend? As Solar time remains the same as ever, human time has now gone mad. The news of a rapid escalation of ‘events’ in the ‘middle East’, the term given by the west because of the spin of the earth, spinning into Sunrise and where there is no middle because there is no beginning or end of a spin, is this the last nail in the coffin of logical government? Or, has President Donald Trump massively shot himself in the foot?

    Is it the same man who somewhere back in February of this year said words to the effect that the USA had plenty of nuclear missiles ‘which could destroy the world 50 times over’ so why add more, and were there not noises of talks between President Trump, Russia and China about ‘de-nuclearization’? No more missiles is one thing, but a coming down, a de-nuclear, is, or was, possibly the most Logical action anyone could take in the human world in this present time. An open-handed action to bring a line down would have filtered down a great deal of other matters, like the biological world has a vast network of seen and unseen processes going on in the zone around one fact, and which the modern humans have well lost sight of.

    In this muddling of geography, ethnicity, belief, historical let’s call them ‘matters’, not to mention the climate disaster (some call it change), and the imminent collapse of supply chains, water supply, etc., if President Trump had followed through on that comment of de-nuclearization, how much would that have filtered on down through the chaos going on? Intention is like the subtle zone in the biological realm, it is not quantifiable yet has a profound factual outworking.

    The ‘middle East’ is geographically and ethnically neither western Europe nor the USA, which is its own landmass with ocean on both sides. It could be said that the nuclear issue is the nastiest of all controversies between the different political zones on Earth. In this crazy age of globalism where the ‘west’ seeks to bring (or impose) democracy and individual values on just about everywhere from North to South Pole and all around Earth, the nuclear issue stands totally opposite to that, the nuclear powers retain the right to err.. retain their nuclear weapons, while telling other countries (and where the divisions are already there in history, religion, culture) that they are very, very bad for wanting a nuclear weapon.

    If nuclear weapons are so bad that some countries cannot have them, and the USA, or President Trump himself ordered, that Iran should be attacked without warning, then Logically the only solution is that probably now throw-away phrase (because it has been thrown away) of “de-nuclearization”. Why has this President who was overwhelmingly voted in for the hope that some common sense can be slotted into the last days of human existence on earth committed this completely idiotic act?

    As well as heightening the nuclear issue with these ‘bad Iranians’, the credibility which President Trump had in restoring some common sense to trade (and apologies to all the hard working trades people who are affected by tariffs but overall, that is common sense and a pity the UK doesn’t have a leader who thinks of its own security) has now evaporated. Any people or any country which is humiliated, as Iran now is, doesn’t bow the knee and accept their wrongdoing, it only makes bad matters so much worse.

    Nearly there was a nuclear button pressed between Pakistan and India, so recently, and it was the same President of the USA who quickly stepped in, and the world breathed a sigh of relief, disaster averted. Now the same President does this inflammatory and idiotic action in the middle East like a bull in a china shop.

    As the UK does not have any, or not nearly enough, young people who could turn up to even train for a fighting army let alone go off and actually do it, and as there are nuclear weapons in the UK, this would be such a very good opportunity for the UK government to show it had some teeth and unilaterally announce that it is to disarm its nuclear weapons. Hypocracy is just the worst situation of all and on the principle of ‘if you don’t use it, then lose it’ which is usually used for cognitive brain exercises that if you don’t keep active then you lose your faculties, but applying that to nuclear weapons, if the UK are not intending to actually use the nuclear weapons then what’s the point of all that time, money and effort to maintain them, and the UK could be the first to both announce and act – the two together – that it is beginning to dismantle all nuclear facilities.

    A long time ago philosophers from Damas, Cairo, Paris, London, would meet and discuss, and a long time ago the trading network on the major ports and inland networks from there, all took full account of difference in geography, culture, belief, language, the long history, and it was a vibrant and engaged world. That time has passed and will never again be possible, because the west has burnt the bridges behind and in front, but of all the actions which could put the widest and most pervasive signal that this high tide mark is very very bad, if President Trump had continued on the de-nuclearization idea and even if just an idea, instead of what has happened this Summer Solstice weekend, then maybe the tide would have turned back and something of a normal ebb and flow just might have held. Instead we have a tsunami of god knows what, and the concept of governance in shreds.

    Thank goodness Solar times does still hold. The northern hemisphere on Earth is now going into shorter days, less Light, down to the Winter Solstice, from where the baby Light will be born and the days slowly slowly lengthen again. No hope of such predictability for the human realm now.

  • A Blog

    Drawing a fine line: the draw of Catholicism.

    Why are young people heading to Catholicism? The facts show that Catholicism has grown a big following, almost from nowhere, out of the several decades of runaway consumerist, credit fuelled, lifestyle image, cheap holidays, 24/7 internet shopping and the general turning upside down of anything considered normal or natural, and until the 1980s there were still a few normal and natural places and spaces even in the Protestant western world. Since then things have taken even a new turn of illogicality and is about to take the whole life zone down with it.

    The repeated appearances of ‘the Catholic church’ as opposed to the Church of England, or the very many different names of Protestant denominations (and which a quick look up of that word meaning is to state which currency a transactions takes place, though to de-nominate could also presumably mean someone who was nominated is now de-nominated, but who knows…and one thing is for sure, the very many thousands of Protestant denominations do keep themselves very clearly separate)is taking on a kind of identity in the media, at events, and when something has become like a shorthand, it is a good thinking exercise to ask what it is a shorthand for.

    Now Jordan Peterson has entered the zone of ‘Catholicism’ though it sounds like that is raising more questions than planned, the shorthand of ‘Catholicism’ must be an entity in itself. That does not mean to say anything profoundly philosophical in terms which are far beyond this writer’s ken and not just from dyslexia, but the more philosophical the terms, the further the focus goes from the basic logic for life on earth, which is that everything is governed by the Sun, the Light emanating from that vast and remarkable source, and the ball of rock pulled into a circle by gravity, orbiting Sun along with various other bodies, and which we are so lucky to have a life zone on Earth, and for how much longer we do not know. This is why it is a curious thing when after something like 2,000 years since the emergence of the Christians, not as the New Testament would have it but from an overstretched Roman Empire, a few fairly psychologically unstable people, and a lot of things cobbled together from existing Greek and Roman practices, and given an extra something to appear novel, and of course after the 2,000 years since to the point where in western Protestant civilization the new religion of science and data now hold the call on what is right and wrong, ‘scientific method or unscientific’ is the terminology, why is specifically Catholicism taking centre stage in this way?

    It is not even as though it is the religion of Catholicism appearing like this. Certainly the recent passing of Pope Francis was a global event, and as this Logical blog asked, why such a difference between the public Catholic events and the public Church of England events collapsing in on itself. There are a very many people in the world today who genuinely believe the belief put by the Christian church, whichever Catholic or Protestant or whichever denomination it is in Scotland, England, Wales, or anywhere around the globe, and that is the curious thing about this recent return to Catholicism, because it now does not appear to be really about the religion, as in the belief, the practices, the rituals, because of time as measured to basically heaven or hell. If it was really asked in a tick box exercise which of the fundamental teaching and beliefs did someone interested in Catholicism really truly believe, it might be hardly any, or even none. So, what is Catholicism, if not Catholicism?

    For a start there are the buildings, the beautiful cathedrals built on geometric principles and which geometry alone formulates a human’s psyche and sense of place, because micro is to macro and the whole of earth is really within such a geometry even though it has been so lost from view for so long. Many of the major cathedrals, Chatres, Glasgow, so many, have significant springs and water energy lines which dowsers can visibly trace, and often a meeting of significant points is found right under a font or an altar. The materials were the best, the stained glass, gold, oak wood, stone floors and steps worn just a little by thousands of feet over hundreds and hundreds of years. Candlelight and choirs and an organ, and the still sense of activity in different chapels, the lines of candles to be lit with 50p in the box and place a candle amongst others already lit by people we do not know, and for people who are never spoken but in our heart we know who they are, and even if a busy city is going on outside, the timeless few minutes or an hour, it is magical and mystical. A world waiting for the plume of smoke to rise over the Vatican, first black this year, heightened the tension, and then the white, and to have still one in the Catholic system in this world of plurality and cut and paste and viral multiplication, the clarity of the Catholic organisation in equal measure enables the visitor to enter without being bothered.

    Catholicism also, even with the fairly terrible abuses that have gone on by the nuns and monks, and the relentless reminder of guilt that many who actually grow up in the Catholic faith are burdened with, for the visitor is not at all demanding on the state of our soul. The average Protestant church greets at the door with the question of the state of your soul, even if not asked implicitly, it is hanging in the air, there is not much else. But Catholic churches with all the trimmings of magic and mysticism, the many beautiful objects, the white marble basin of water, the general silence of the place, paradoxically it is appearing as the geometric place where all the simplicity and beauty and ritual can be given, with no need to account for one’s belief or progression towards heaven. For the Protestant west this is a very strange occurrence in society, though for the Catholic continentals there has always been the threading through of popping in to Mass, the acknowledgement even if not devotion to the local saint, and the stronger family and community networks that exist around that, as the Protestants imploded into rational science and individualism.

    Jordan Peterson is talking about Catholicism, and it appears the true Catholics and the true philosophers are hard at it to explain whatever their position is, and to make sure he is limited into a really non Catholic box, because Catholicism is, well, religion, and philosophy is, well, philosophy. But what he is talking about in having been so important to young people, especially the boys cut adrift as feminism started to really destabilize society and normal behaviour of dating and socialising and societal rough and tumble fell silent now to the point now of the kind of religious witch hunt turned against men and against ‘populists’ who speak of tradition, and against those who see the necessity of basic structure in society, what he is talking about is quite fascinating to those interested in the long history of belief, of which this writer is one. The cathedrals are there, still as geometric and beautiful as ever, though mostly empty, and the many people young and old who have no place in society, because the form of society has been collapsed like the collapse of a big marquee, so really this is a marriage made in heaven, of the stability and gravitas and beauty of the Catholic structures should now be filling with all those put off the wheel by the deconstructualists, from New Labour onwards.

    It is really for a few decades that something has been changing, as shown by the numbers of people who walk The Camino to Santiago. Many many of those would say they are not Catholic believers, yet the act of a significant walk to a sacred place, and Santiago was an important pagan site long before the Christians appeared, and the rigours along the way, it changes everything, because of the limitations. Because of the limitations. Limitations bring focus, and focus is the logical position for us humans, because really there are no other options, and when the water runs out or supply chains are disrupted, then the focus of limitation appears like hitting the buffer. Midnight Mass also, in the last what? 10 years maybe?, it has become a significant event and many Catholic churches and high Protestants have seen an astonishing rise in people coming, but just for that event. Some churches have even put on a Midnight Mass if there wasn’t one before, because supply and demand are basic principles. And for us pagans who watch from the purely geometric position of Summer and Winter Solstice, the placing of Christmas so near the Winter Solstice and switching the Sun to the Son, and true Light to Jesus being the Light of the World, well, we can generously say how much we understand the desire for non religious folk to go into a church for midnight, the deepest darkest turn of one day to another, and watch the new candlelight being lit out of the darkness. It is a profound thing, though purely factual from the position of Earth and Sun and now so utterly lost in our society.

    Those wise young people looking for clarity and a sense of order, and who are finding it paradoxically in the buildings from where natural rhythms of society were taken away, it is a beautiful societal circle that old fashioned relationships could be made again, of whatever nature from friendships to partnerships where children will be along, and confidence grown again and a living civic model restore again with no doubt most Catholic priests not too fussed about what someone does or does not believe doctrinally, but just the sight of so many bums on seats, pews, and an appreciation of the formal ceremonial rituals and some coins in the donation box, well, what a surprise, civic society is to be found in Catholicism, in the geometric sense.

  • A Blog

    Would reverse logic be logical in Gaza?

    Would reverse logic be logical in Gaza? The natural human action if someone has a grievance is to continue, continue, continue, enough until the grievance is balanced out by action onto the other. When enough has been proved, then at least there is some satisfaction that the grievance did not go unnoticed. And of course in the natural order of things, the balance of life is held not by peace and love man, sharing and caring, empathizing and including, but by that basic and unalterable equation in the life zone on the Earth’s surface where everything is limited, and all participants (except the human) balance between themselves of resources and networks, and that includes eating each other, because where else would they get their food? From the tiniest bacteria to the biggest elephant, all are within a network of survival where the life zone is circulated within the defining parameter of gravity, water, and Sunlight.

    Several species of ant take slaves, lions work together to get a gazelle, just as the large sea creatures position themselves together when the shoals come into shore, to ensure maximum food at the optimum time. Such is the connectivity and intelligence within species, and the native tribes would be more a part of the natural world than what is now the different perceived habitation of the human. Even the early empires of the eastern Mediterranean, of the vast Persian empire, the Egyptians, Hellenistic Greece, everything measured still to geo-graphy, but also the psychology of the modern human species to control more than is needed for food. Was it the Third Punic War, where Rome triumphed and the stage was open for expansion, domination, and the watchful eye of Fortune conveniently avoided? In 63 BCE the Roman army sacked Jerusalem, and the various sieges and destruction during the 60s BCE is a long time ago, but the geography is the same.

    In 2025, the Middle East (as defined from Britain, but in the Middle East they are just where they are) is a crisis and way beyond the ken of this writer. However, if focus comes back out instead of in deeper, there are just a few cogs in the chaos which show as a cause and effect. The modern human, when there’s a cause, just continues, beyond the need for food and water and sex which is the natural biological drivers but because Israel and Gaza are not a large empire territory, would it be possible to hold two things together? The biological ethnographic difference of peoples who have been natives in the area for thousands of years, and warring tribes are as natural as quarrelsome rooks, combined with the complications of modern politics, the west’s obsession with imposing democracy on every corner of the world (which has no corners, because it is sphere formed by gravity), the supply of weapons, which are called arms, armaments, and the global media conveying all aspects, from all points of view.

    If the one event of Hamas taking Jewish hostages in October 2023, and from which has unleashed a kind of nuclear bomb reaction, not surprisingly for the hostages and families involved, if that were seen as the highest peak of upset, regardless of how the whole conflict came to be, but just taking that one incident and drawing a line around it, what would happen if Hamas just released all remaining hostages and said, ‘We’ve made our point.’ Does focus become clearer when combat goes on, as logically it would be thought, or does it become clearer when reverse logic is applied, and the tug of war rope put down? If one side just stops, where does the winner/loser equation lie? What would Israel do, or the leader of Israel do, if all hostages were released, walked to the conflict line and returned to where they belong, what happens next?

    There is a phrase of someone who doesn’t take prisoners, and the general meaning is that they then don’t live with the confusion involved, the uncertainty, or the need to keep your prisoners secure but also fed and watered, all of which take resources which you might not have. To not take prisoners which have to be kept, is therefore liberating, and liberation of course is the opposite of being a prisoner. What if the people of Gaza had a poll to vote whether they wanted Hamas to return all prisoners, and to see if that would stop the bombing. To demarcate just that one action, and do it, is that warfare or leadership? Long gone are the days when conflicts were settled by an arm wrestle, and more’s the pity, but also long gone are the days when a leader also had to use some philosophical manoevering, some checks and balance for their own survival even apart from warfare, and as natural and inevitable as conflict is, why could not this very local and yet polar opposite conflict be a zone for a new kind of more cerebral conflict. Total destruction of the other is understandable, especially as the suffering grows by the day, but in such chaos there is even more possibility for testing out a reverse logic. If instead of losing it would be a gain, by showing one has the power of thought and action, then why not?

  • A Blog

    The Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury

    2025 is showing itself to be a complicated year for the Christian religion. A few months ago the very public exit of Justin Welby from the position of Archbishop of Canterbury, for all the reasons the exit was for, was preceded by weeks and months of air time and print space from the now so many different people and viewpoints holding some level of office within the CofE (Church of England). Without even a tiny diversion into the fascinating history of the 1400s and 1500s in Italy and northern Europe, and of course England, as to why and how Protestantism and the Church of England arose, this blog will just put all Protestant beliefs, including the Kirk in Scotland and the roughly 45,000 different denominations and sub groups and tiny groups under ‘Protestant’ meaning it arose from the 1400s, which is only about 500 years.

    In this same year, and very recently, a loved and respected Pope died, and the air time and print time and TV time was one huge global outpouring of grief, ceremony, gathering, traditional processes to be followed, plus the information that many young people are attending Catholic churches. Yet the Catholic church has a fairly terrible history of abuses, scandals, financial issues, (and looking back in history, were responsible for severing the relationship of the human to Helios, the governing power of Earth, before of course themselves being treated as the evil ones by the Protestants). Even for those who are within the Catholic church and hold to the beliefs and to the Christian god in the afterlife, the less than positive aspects of the Catholic church are public knowledge. Yet events as in recent weeks, and the smooth transition to a new Pope, have been as a united group of people, under one event and one person. And further, because the new Pope is an American, the Catholic church has seamlessly joined global politics with the offer of a possible Vatican hosting of peace talks thereby leapfrogging into the centre of the present day world crisis.

    So, the question is, why do these two underlying structures of western civilization show in public to be so diametrically opposite in 2025?

  • A Blog

    Assisted Dying, who is the relevant person here?

    Assisted Dying, that current heightened subject in the ‘UK’, has been passed by the Scottish Parliament today, to move on to Committee stage. The media channels, and especially BBC Radio 4, gives the matter central air time and not from the decision of a Parliamentary vote in favour. The subject is dying, and we are all going to die, because all humans are part of the life zone on planet Earth, just one of the bodies held in gravity around Helios. Because we live, we die, it is just a fact of life, no pun intended. The fact of life is also the fact of death, which in this question means physical matter death. The realm of spirit is different again, and one which evidence proves is as natural as life and death of physical matter, but spirit dimensions and ‘life after death’ are not the subject of the Assisted Dying debates going on in the present day.

    Each time this question meets the public sphere, as it certainly does when a Parliament votes to move it forward, as Westminster and Holyrood have now both done, and the Isle of Mann, and Jersey, but let’s stick with Westminster and Edinburgh, while strangely the go-ahead Welsh on language and respect for landscape features such as Yr Wyddfa (and you’d have to be a native Welsh speaker to pronounce that one, wouldn’t you!) have less room for discussion on the matter of assisted dying, because it is really Westminster and Edinburgh which BBC Radio 4 follow. Again today, again, because the subject of assisted dying is public news, the reflex is to give air time to someone in a wheelchair. In England that person is a well-known sportswoman, and in Scotland today, that person is an MSP. If it was said, what’s it got to to do with them, then accusations of discrimination against disabled people would fly, both are women so accusations of misogyny would soon follow, and everything heads to the usual shut down of any real discussion or relevance.

    What is missing in this debate on assisted dying, it could be said,(as one must say in this age of near paranoia of offending someone), is that it is nothing to do with anybody except the person errr……dying. In a logical blog it is the height of illogicality to interview anybody on the subject of assisted dying – with the stated framework of a likely 6 month expectation of life, before a certain death (which we all will have), in England at least but still the same principles are in the motion in Scotland – who does not have a terminal illness that is very likely to lead to a bad end, a painful end, a traumatic end for them and all around them, and a period where life is not the lovely exchanges around a bedside as someone gently slips away. Some people have that, the one who is dying and then those around them, and what a lovely way to go. For others who will not be having a peaceful ending with perhaps a bit of pain relief at the end but nothing too grotesque, how incredibly disrespectful is it to have BBC Radio 4 interviewing people who use wheelchairs. To use a wheelchair must be unbelievably frustrating, but it is not a terminal illness. Nor is mental disability, nor is old age, nor is depression and nor is anything else except a terminal illness which is only going one way.

    Why is it in this age of individualism, the ‘person centred’ obsession, the empathising and all the sugary psychological talk, that a person in bad pain, bad failing of bodily functions, possibly weeks or a few months, bad psychological state of having all the caring people staring at them 24/7, a person asking, begging, to be helped to move on, and which has no other interpretation than what they are saying, often someone who has lived a life to the full and not sat around, someone who is in a network of loving caring people who also do not want to see this unfolding horror of their last few weeks or months, why is it that they have to hear media channels holding a theatrical debate on everything but the obvious?

    Since the unfortunate case of Harold Shipman despatching many people under the job title of doctor in the NHS a certain paranoia has risen, that anyone talking about death means they want to kill people. The Christians have always had their own rationale, based on beliefs which are not logical – as measured to Earth and Helios – and no doubt other religions also have their reasons. The NHS believes citizens live in it, from cradle to grave, and to reject the NHS is not far off the Christians in their belief of salvation and hell. Isn’t it strange that there is an obsession of crime writing, crime films, crime research in the ‘UK’, where literary festivals not put on a crime event because that is the one which will sell out on opening sales, while history, geography, natural history, the makers and observers are lucky to fill part seats. Put against the obsession with crime, murder, problems in life, why does something as natural as assisted dying, for someone who is only going one way and which any physician with any basic understanding can see, why is this subject such a public spectacle in the ‘UK’?

  • A Blog

    The transgender crisis in Britain

    In the last few days a news item appeared in the ‘UK’ of how girls wishing to change gender are going to be tested for autism. This is an interesting one for several reasons and of course is only relevant at all because of the strange obsession with sex and gender which has taken hold in the last decade or so, and of course with the possibility of actually being able to go through a medical change. This post is not about what is a biological woman, and which has also been in the news recently, causing hours of debate. Logically that subject is as it always has been, and where the ancient Greeks had such a very sensible view that there was male and there was female, and then there were some males who were a bit more female and there were some females who were a bit more male, and such has ever been the human population all over Earth. Happily for the ancient Greeks, men-men had their place, men-women had their place in the household, and for the real women-women well, there was Lesbos just over the water.

    This comment is about the link made between girls wishing to change gender and that a test for autism could be made. Apparently statistics show a higher percentage of those wishing to change gender are autistic than the average, so there is a correlation. Why would this be? A few decades ago when a tiny number of people did change gender, to now when it has almost become those not questioning their gender have to apologise for being just as they are, where do sex/gender and autism stand? And why autistic girls, and not autistic boys? Why do autistic girls want to become boys but not so many autistic boys want to become girls?

    Because this blog is measured entirely from the logical point of view, where does logic sit in this matter? A logical approach would be to cross reference back over recent history, because as the medical facility to change gender has been a bit of a boom industry in the 2000s it is very easy to compare back to say, the 1960s, 1970s or 1980s when these sort of societal questions were just not in the public parlance. What is missing in this question of autistic girls and changing gender?

    Well, logically, society itself is missing in this debate in Britain. The public realm in which young and old live, males and females, and all the variations, never gets a look in now. The inversion of the public sphere – meaning a measurable public area – used to have an identity even if not actually living like a biological being, it still did have an identity to which the human related and engaged. Now in the strange psychological inversions that have taken place, probably largely from the digital screens which invert and invert again, those born in the 1990s, almost it seems into a digital screen, have no knowledge of society as an entity only a few decades back. In that society were groups of young people like the Famous Five, with George, real name Georgina, who wore her hair short, wanted to be called a boy’s name, and could stand as one of society’s greatest icons to the tomboy. What a great position to hold. If the balance of hormones puts a girl into a more masculine category and society allows the freedom to cut the hair, use a boy’s name, and not have to worry about the feminine complications in life then what better a life could there be?

    If ‘the tomboy’ was restored to its previous natural place, and autistic girls who felt uncomfortable in the present day female realm did not have to consider medically changing sex, with the proviso that you can’t actually change into the other sex, would that be a logical solution to this massive problem? In the distorted world of digital images and the selfie and the limitless supply of cheap clothes, make up, strange looking nails from a nail bar, hair extensions and large eye lashes, it is not really a surprise that autistic girls do not wish to identify with such things. If a specific category of ‘tomboy’ was restored, even with a box on forms to tick, how much confusion would reduce just from that? Possibly quite a lot.

    But if the societal identity was further asked, where does Britain stand on all humans measuring their identity to the public place? Nowadays the words space and place are used interchangeably, but on the Earth’s surface a space has to be a place. If instead of young people being encouraged to define themselves by anything but the public realm, this was turned on its head and the public realm was the definition, how could that be useful in lessening individual identity confusion? Hannah Arendt talked about the three realms of the public, the private, and then the social sphere, Walking around most British towns these days it isn’t possible to see any definition at all is it. What if the ‘UK’ government made a law to say that in the public realm, in which biological people look at each other, everyone regardless of sex should be covered by clothes from collar bone to elbow, and down to the knee. How would that change the sexual identity confusion going on today? Probably it would be a great relief for the autistic girls who grow up amongst females putting out sexual availability, obsessed by every like on their screens, obsessed by who is looking at them, by who said what to who and where, while autistic girls spend their time on more useful things and in more useful pursuits yet with no societal place now, only with the guys, the non transitioned guys that is. If there was both a law passed to take this overt sexual availability out of public places, and transport, and in the way females dress in organisations and conferences and out jogging, along with an official restoration of the place of the tomboy in society, how would that change the statistics of autistic girls wishing to change gender? Probably it would change it a lot.

  • A Blog

    Societal benefits of autism in the USA, and the ‘UK’

    After RFK Jr. made his comments about autistic people not working or paying taxes, did he ask himself how much tax Bill Gates pays? It is probably quite a lot, plus Bill Gates shows the classic autistic pattern of ….. dedication to work without the ego directing matters when he stepped down from Chairman back to running the functional side of his company. And how much money is raised in tax for the USA by clever young people who once upon a time would have been accounts clerks, librarians, technical drawers, engineers, natural scientists, indexers, patient teachers of useful subjects like maths and geography, and are now sucked into the digital world of coding and worse, the new AI. Whether they worked in the real world or in the new world, still a great deal of processes underpinning western society are done by those who do not have an ego, do have immense concentration and care about getting things right, and can be relied on to sort it out when a problem is identified.

    Yes of course there are some autistic people who don’t work and pay tax but the percentage overall is probably very small for those who don’t. Instead of making a public spectacle of himself in going after a cure for autistic people, who incidentally are not a recent blip in the progress of western civilization but we go back a long way, yes a very long way, and even in more recent history Sir Isaac Newton showed every indication that he was autistic, along with many others who could focus and observe over long periods, RFK Jr. could take a different approach.

    In order to improve workplaces generally to enable more work to be done rather than open plan chat, unhealthy buildings of artificial materials instead of stone and wood, bright lights and computer systems which will all fail at the first large Solar flare, RFK Jr. could put forward a policy initiative that there is an autistic person on every Board, every management committee, every facilities department, every school, every everything, and he will see just how useful autistic people are.

  • A Blog

    Solar flares, beautiful aurorae, earthquakes, digital collapse

    The Earth, the ball of rock surrounded by an atmosphere and containing a life zone in which humans inhabit, along with the millions and zillions of other organisms, is experiencing the affect (or is it the effect?) of the 11-year cycle of solar flares. These massive ejections are creating beautiful Northern Lights for those living in the north-ish of the northern hemisphere, and Southern Lights for those living on land masses near enough the South Pole to see. These magical light shows in the sky are not visible around the Equator due to the electromagnetic pull at either Pole, which creates the awesome display. It could be a huge concert, lights, action, plugs, the sky lit up, the humans amazed and entertained and it is something like that because electricity generates marvellous sights, from lightning flashes to aurorae. Science knows it is not an assistant of Helios flinging down flares onto Earth, neither is it the entertainment show and which this year are providing some spectacular images captured on the smart phones. The science of solar particles and the 11-year cycle is way too complicated for this blog, only the logical view is relevant, and the fundamental equation of gravitational balance between Helios and Earth.

    If another equation is measured, not scientifically but on the back of an envelope, is this time of solar flares causing greater than usual disruption to the earth surface. The 1859 Carrington Event flare was a big one and nothing has been seen on that scale since, but this year Myanmar experienced a big earthquake with the resulting devastation on the surface above it, California this week, and Spain also have had quakes. As some humans look outward at the more vivid than usual aurorae at North and South Poles, and some pick through rubble for weeks after a quake, what is the equation of impact if a big Solar flare in this time of big Solar flares just crosses the threshold of domestic, corporate, government, scientific, space technology, street lights and traffic lights, railways, water pumping stations, sensor operated entry doors and oh so much more, and the new kid on the block of the AI data generator centres. Has belief of the modern human crossed the threshold into now a religious certainty that the digital world looks back at Earth from a protected zone, a realm and place completely outside of Helios and Sun and utterly invincible (as long as you have the right charger). It is not an easy prospect to contemplate, but when is the flare going to be hurled to Earth which does just that, it turns out the lights. The aurorae will go on, beautiful because of the strength of the flare, but who would be appreciating them then?

  • A Pagan Blog

    The Emperor Julian, A Hymn to King Helios

    What I am now about to say I consider to be of the greatest importance for all things and have a share in existence and a reasoning soul620 and intelligence, but above all others it is of importance to myself. For I am a follower of King Helios. And of this fact I possess within me, known to myself alone, proofs more certain that I can give.621 But this at least I am permitted to say without sacrilege, that from my childhood an extraordinary longing for the rays of the god penetrated deep into my soul; and from my earliest years my mind was so completely swayed by the light that illumines the heavens that not only did I desire to gaze intently at the sun, but whenever I walked abroad in the night season, when the firmament was clear and cloudless, I abandoned all else without exception and gave myself up to the beauties of the heavens; nor did I understand what anyone might say to me, nor heed what I was doing myself. I was considered to be over-curious about these matters and to pay too much attention to them, and people went so far as to regard me as an astrologer when my beard had only just begun to grow. And yet, I call heaven to witness, never had a book on this subject come into my hands; nor did I as yet even know what that science was. But why do I mention this, when I have more important things to tell, if I should relate how, in those days, I thought about the gods? However let that darkness622 be buried in oblivion. But let what I have said bear witness to this fact, that the heavenly light shone all about me, and that it roused and urged me on to its contemplation, so that even then I recognised of myself that the movement of the moon was in the opposite direction to the universe, though as yet I had met no one of those who are wise in these matters. Now for my part I envy the good fortune of any man to whom the god has granted to inherit a body built of the seed of holy and inspired ancestors, so that he can unlock the treasures of wisdom; nor do I despise that lot with which I was myself endowed by the god Helios, that I should be born of a house that rules and governs the world in my time; but further, I regard this god, if we may believe the wise, as the common father of all mankind.623 For it is said with truth that man and the sun together beget man, and that the god sows this earth with souls which proceed not from himself alone but from the other gods also; and for what purpose, the souls reveal by the kind of lives that they select. Now far the best thing is when anyone has the fortune to have inherited the service of the god, even before the third generation, from a long and unbroken line of ancestors; yet it is not a thing to be disparaged when anyone, recognising that he is by nature intended to be the servant of Helios, either alone of all men, or in company with but few, devotes himself to the service of his master.

    Come then, let me celebrate, as best I may, his festival which the Imperial city626 adorns with annual sacrifices.627 Now it is hard, as I well know, merely to comprehend how great is the Invisible, if one judge by his visible self,628 and to tell it is perhaps impossible, even though one should consent to fall short of what is his due. For well I know that no one in the world could attain to a description that would be worthy of him, and not to fail of a certain measure of success in his praises is the greatest height to which human beings can attain in the power of utterance. But as for me, may Hermes, the god of eloquence, stand by my side to aid me, and the Muses also and Apollo, the leader of the Muses, since he too has oratory for his province, and may they grant that I utter only what the gods approve that men should say and believe about them. What, then, shall be the manner of my praise? Or is it not evident that if I describe his substance and his origin, and his powers and energies, both visible and invisible, and the gift of blessings which he bestows throughout all the worlds,629 I shall compose an encomium not wholly displeasing to the god? With these, then, let me begin.

    This divine and wholly beautiful universe, from the highest vault of heaven to the lowest limit of the earth, is held together by the continuous providence of the god, has existed from eternity ungenerated, is imperishable for all time to come, and is guarded immediately by nothing else than the Fifth Substance634 whose culmination is the beams of the sun; and in the second and higher degree, so to speak, by the intelligible world; but in a still loftier sense it is guarded by the King of the whole universe, who is the centre of all things that exist. He, therefore, whether it is right to call him the Supra-Intelligible, or the Idea of Being, and by Being I mean the whole intelligible region, or the One, since the One seems somehow to be prior to all the rest, or, to use Plato’s name for him, the Good; at any rate this uncompounded cause of the whole reveals to all existence beauty, and perfection, and oneness, and irresistible power; and in virtue of the primal creative substance that abides in it, produced, as middle among the middle and intellectual, creative causes, Helios the most mighty god, proceeding from itself and in all things like unto itself. Even so the divine Plato believed, when he writes, “Therefore (said I) when I spoke of this, understand that I meant the offspring of the Good which the Good begat in his own likeness, and that what the Good is in relation to pure reason and its objects in the intelligible world, such is the sun in the visible world in relation to sight and its objects.” Accordingly his light has the same relation to the visible world as truth has to the intelligible world. And he himself as a whole, since he is the son of what is first and greatest, namely, the Idea of the Good, and subsists from eternity in the region of its abiding substance, has received also the dominion among the intellectual gods, and himself dispenses to the intellectual gods those things of which the Good is the cause for the intelligible gods. Now the Good is, I suppose, the cause for the intelligible gods of beauty, existence, perfection, and oneness, connecting these and illuminating them with a power that works for good. These accordingly Helios bestows on the intellectual gods also, since he has been appointed by the Good to rule and govern them, even though they came forth and came into being together with him, and this was, I suppose, in order that the cause which resembles the Good may guide the intellectual gods to blessings for them all, and may regulate all things according to pure reason.

    But this visible disc also, third640 in rank, is clearly, for the objects of sense-perception the cause of preservation, and this visible Helios641 is the cause for the visible gods642 of just as many blessings as we said mighty Helios bestows on the intellectual gods. And of this there are clear proofs for one who studies the unseen world in the light of things seen. For in the first place, is not light itself a sort of incorporeal and divine form of the transparent in a state of activity? And as for the transparent itself, whatever it is, since it is the underlying basis, so to speak, of all the elements, and is a form peculiarly belonging to them, it is not like the corporeal or compounded, nor does it admit qualities peculiar to corporeal substance.643 You will not therefore say that heat is a property of the transparent, or its opposite cold, nor will you assign to it hardness or softness or any other of the various attributes connected with touch or taste or smell; but a nature of this sort is obvious to sight alone, since it is brought into activity by light. And light is a form of this substance, so to speak, which is the substratum of and coextensive with the heavenly bodies. And of light, itself incorporeal, the culmination and flower, so to speak, is the sun’s rays. Now the doctrine of the Phoenicians, who were wise and learned in sacred lore, declared that the rays of light everywhere diffused are the undefiled incarnation of pure mind. And in harmony with this is our theory, seeing that light itself is incorporeal, if one should regard its fountainhead, not as corporeal, but as the undefiled activity of mind644 pouring light into its own abode: and this is assigned to the middle of the whole firmament, whence it sheds its rays and fills the heavenly spheres with vigour of every kind and illumines all things with light divine and undefiled. Now the activities proceeding from it and exercised among the gods have been, in some measure at least, described by me a little earlier and will shortly be further spoken of. But all that we see merely with the sight at first is a name only, deprived of activity, unless we add thereto the guidance and aid of light. For what, speaking generally, could be seen, were it not first brought into touch with light in order that, I suppose, it may receive a form, as matter is brought under the hand of a craftsman? And indeed molten gold in the rough is simply gold, and not yet a statue or an image, until the craftsman give it its proper shape. So too all the objects of sight, unless they are brought under the eyes of the beholder together with light, are altogether deprived of visibility. Accordingly by giving the power of sight to those who see, and the power of being seen to the objects of sight, it brings to perfection, by means of a single activity, two faculties, namely vision and visibility.645 And in forms and substance are expressed its perfecting powers.

    However, this is perhaps somewhat subtle; but as for that guide whom we all follow, ignorant and unlearned, philosophers and rhetoricians, what power in the universe has this god when he rises and sets? Night and day he creates, and before our eyes changes and sways the universe. But to which of the other heavenly bodies does this power belong? How then can we now fail to believe, in view of this, in respect also to things more divine that the invisible and divine tribes of intellectual gods above the heavens are filled with power that works for good by him, even by him to whom the whole band of the heavenly bodies yields place, and whom all generated things follow, piloted by his providence? For that the planets dance about him as their king, in certain intervals, fixed in relation to him, and revolve in a circle with perfect accord, making certain halts, and pursuing to and fro their orbit,647 as those who are learned in the study of the spheres call their visible motions; and that the light of the moon waxes and wanes varying in proportion to its distance from the sun, is, I think, clear to all. Then is it not natural that we should suppose that the more venerable ordering of bodies among the intellectual gods corresponds to this arrangement?

    Let us therefore comprehend, out of all his functions, first his power to perfect, from the fact that he makes visible the objects of sight in the universe, for through his light he perfects them; secondly, his creative and generative power from the changes wrought by him in the universe; thirdly, his power to link together all things into one whole, from the harmony of his motions towards one and the same goal; fourthly, his middle station we can comprehend from himself, who is midmost; and fifthly, the fact that he is established as king among the intellectual gods, from his middle station among the planets. Now if we see that these powers, or powers of similar importance, belong to any one of the other visible deities, let us not assign to Helios leadership among the gods. But if he has nothing in common with those other gods except his beneficent energy, and of this too he gives them all a share, then let us call to witness the priests of Cyprus who set up common altars to Helios and Zeus; but even before them let us summon as witness Apollo, who sits in council with our god. For this god declares: “Zeus, Hades, Helios Serapis, three gods in one godhead!”657 Let us then assume that, among the intellectual gods, Helios and Zeus have a joint or rather a single sovereignty. Hence I think that with reason Plato called Hades a wise god.658 And we call this same god Hades Serapis also, namely the Unseen659 and Intellectual, to whom Plato says the souls of those who have lived most righteously and justly mount upwards. For let no one conceive of him as the god whom the legends teach us to shudder at, but as the mild and placable, since he completely frees our souls from generation: and the souls that he has thus freed he does not nail to other bodies, punishing them and exacting penalties, but he carries aloft and lifts up our souls to the intelligible world. And that this doctrine is not wholly new, but that Homer and Hesiod the most venerable of the poets held it before us, whether this was their own view or, like seers, they were divinely inspired with a sacred frenzy for the truth, is evident from the following. Hesiod, in tracing his genealogy, said660 that Helios is the son of Hyperion and Thea, intimating thereby that he is the true son of him who is above all things. For who else could Hyperion661 be? And is not Thea herself, in another fashion, said to be most divine of beings? But as for a union or marriage, let us not conceive of such a thing, since that is the incredible and paradoxical trifling of the poetic Muse. But let us believe that his father and sire was the most divine and supreme being; and who else could have this nature save him who transcends all things, the central point and goal of all things that exist? And Homer calls him Hyperion after his father and shows his unconditioned nature, superior to all constraint. For Zeus, as Homer says, since he is lord of all constrains the other gods. And when, in the course of the myth, Helios says that on account of the impiety of the comrades of Odysseus662 he will forsake Olympus, Zeus no longer says, “Then with very earth would I draw you up and the sea withal,”6nor does he threaten him with fetters or violence, but he says that he will inflict punishment on the guilty and bids Helios go on shining among the gods. Does he not thereby declare that besides being unconditioned, Helios has also the power to perfect? For why do the gods need him unless by sending his light, himself invisible, on their substance and existence, he fulfils for them the blessings of which I spoke? For when Homer says that “Ox-eyed Hera, the queen, sent unwearied Helios to go, all unwilling, to the streams of Oceanus,” he means that, by reason of a heavy mist, it was thought to be night before the proper time. And this mist is surely the goddess herself, and in another place also in the poem he says, “Hera spread before them a thick mist.” But let us leave the stories of the poets alone. For along with what is inspired they contain much also that is merely human. And let me now relate what the god himself seems to teach us, both about himself and the other gods.

    The region of the earth contains being in a state of becoming. Then who endows it with imperishability? Is it not he666 who keeps it all together by means of definite limits? For that the nature of being should be unlimited was not possible, since it is neither uncreated nor self-subsistent. And if from being something were generated absolutely without ceasing and nothing were resolved back into it, the substance of things generated would fail. Accordingly this god, moving in due measure, raises up and stimulates this substance when he approaches it, and when he departs to a distance he diminishes and destroys it; or rather he himself continually revivifies it by giving it movement and flooding it with life. And his departure and turning in the other direction is the cause of decay for things that perish. Ever does his gift of blessings descend evenly upon the earth. For now one country now another receives them, to the end that becoming may not cease nor the god ever benefit less or more than is his custom this changeful world. For sameness, as of being so also of activity, exists among the gods, and above all the others in the case of the King of the All, Helios; and he also makes the simplest movement of all the heavenly bodies667 that travel in a direction opposite to the whole. In fact this is the very thing that the celebrated Aristotle makes a proof of his superiority, compared with the others. Nevertheless from the other intellectual gods also, forces clearly discernible descend to this world. And now what does this mean? Are we not excluding the others when we assert that the leadership has been assigned to Helios? Nay, far rather do I think it right from the visible to have faith about the invisible.668 For even as this god is seen to complete and to adapt to himself and to the universe the powers that are bestowed on the earth from the other gods for all things, after the same fashion we must believe that among the invisible gods also there is intercourse with one another; his mode of intercourse being that of a leader, while the modes of intercourse of the others are at the same time in harmony with his. For since we said that the god is established midmost among the midmost intellectual gods, may King Helios himself grant to us to tell what is the nature of that middleness among things of which we must regard him as the middle.

    Now “middleness”670 we define not as that mean which in opposites is seen to be equally remote from the extremes, as, for instance, in colours, tawny or dusky, and warm in the case of hot and cold, and the like, but that which unifies and links together what is separate; for instance the sort of thing that Empedocles671 means by Harmony when from it he altogether eliminates Strife. And now what does Helios link together, and of what is he the middle? I assert then that he is midway between the visible gods who surround the universe and the immaterial and intelligible gods who surround the Good—for the intelligible and divine substance is as it were multiplied without external influence and without addition. For that the intellectual and wholly beautiful substance of King Helios is middle in the sense of being unmixed with extremes, complete in itself, and distinct from the whole number of the gods, visible and invisible, both those perceptible by sense and those which are intelligible only, I have already declared, and also in what sense we must conceive of his middleness. But if I must also describe these things one by one, in order that we may discern with our intelligence how his intermediary nature, in its various forms, is related both to the highest and the lowest, even though it is not easy to recount it all, yet let me try to say what can be said. Wholly one is the intelligible world, pre-existent from all time, and it combines all things together in the One. Again is not our whole world also one complete living organism, wholly throughout the whole of it full of soul and intelligence, “perfect, with all its parts perfect”? Midway then between this uniform two-fold perfection—I mean that one kind of unity holds together in one all that exists in the intelligible world, while the other kind of unity unites in the visible world all things into one and the same perfect nature—between these, I say, is the uniform perfection of King Helios, established among the intellectual gods. There is, however, next in order, a sort of binding force in the intelligible world of the gods, which orders all things into one. Again is there not visible in the heavens also, travelling in its orbit, the nature of the Fifth Substance, which links and compresses676 together all the parts, holding together things that by nature are prone to scatter and to fall away from one another? These existences, therefore, which are two causes of connection, one in the intelligible world, while the other appears in the world of sense-perception, King Helios combines into one, imitating the synthetic power of the former among the intellectual gods, seeing that he proceeds from it, and subsisting prior to the latter which is seen in the visible world. Then must not the unconditioned also, which exists primarily in the intelligible world, and finally among the visible bodies in the heavens, possess midway between these two the unconditioned substance of King Helios, and from that primary creative substance do not the rays of his light, illumining all things, descend to the visible world? Again, to take another point of view, the creator of the whole is one, but many are the creative gods677 who revolve in the heavens. Midmost therefore of these also we must place the creative activity which descends into the world from Helios. But also the power of generating life is abundant and overflowing in the intelligible world; and our world also appears to be full of generative life. It is therefore evident that the life-generating power of King Helios also is midway between both the worlds: and the phenomena of our world also bear witness to this. For some forms he perfects, others he makes, or adorns, or wakes to life, and there is no single thing which, apart from the creative power derived from Helios, can come to light and to birth. And further, besides this, if we should comprehend the pure and undefiled and immaterial substance678 among the intelligible gods—to which nothing external is added, nor has any alien thing a place therein, but it is filled with its own unstained purity—and if we should comprehend also the pure and unmixed nature of unstained and divine substance, whose elements are wholly unmixed, and which, in the visible universe, surrounds the substance that revolves,679 here also we should discover the radiant and stainless substance of King Helios, midway between the two; that is to say, midway between the immaterial purity that exists among the intelligible gods, and that perfect purity, unstained and free from birth and death, that exists in the world which we can perceive. And the greatest proof of this is that not even the light which comes down nearest to the earth from the sun is mixed with anything, nor does it admit dirt and defilement, but remains wholly pure and without stain and free from external influences among all existing things. But we must go on to consider the immaterial and intelligible forms,680 and also those visible forms which are united with matter or the substratum. Here again, the intellectual will be found to be midmost among the forms that surround mighty Helios, by which forms in their turn the material forms are aided; for they never could have existed or been preserved, had they not been brought, by his aid, into connection with being. For consider: is not he the cause of the separation of the forms, and of the combination of matter, in that he not only permits us to comprehend his very self, but also to behold him with our eyes? For the distribution of his rays over the whole universe, and the unifying power of his light, prove him to be the master workman who gives an individual existence to everything that is created. Now though there are many more blessings connected with the substance of the god and apparent to us, which show that he is midway between the intelligible and the mundane gods682 let us proceed to his last visible province. His first province then in the last of the worlds is, as though by way of a pattern, to give form and personality to the sun’s angels.683 Next is his province of generating the world of sense-perception, of which the more honourable part contains the cause of the heavens and the heavenly bodies, while the inferior part guides this our world of becoming, and from eternity contains in itself the uncreated cause of that world. Now to describe all the properties of the substance of this god, even though the god himself should grant one to comprehend them, is impossible, seeing that even to grasp them all with the mind is, in my opinion, beyond our power.

    But since I have already described many of them, I must set a seal, as it were, on this discourse, now that I am about to pass to other subjects that demand no less investigation. What then that seal is, and what is the knowledge of the god’s substance that embraces all these questions, and as it were sums them up under one head, may he himself suggest to my mind, since I desire to describe in a brief summary both the cause from which he proceeded, and his own nature, and those blessings with which he fills the visible world. This then we must declare, that King Helios is One and proceeds from one god, even from the intelligible world which is itself One; and that he is midmost of the intellectual gods, stationed in their midst by every kind of mediateness that is harmonious and friendly, and that joins what is sundered; and that he brings together into one the last and the first, having in his own person the means of completeness, of connection, of generative life and of uniform being: and that for the world which we can perceive he initiates blessings of all sorts, not only by means of the light with which he illumines it, adorning it and giving it its splendour, but also because he calls into existence, along with himself, the substance of the Sun’s angels; and that finally in himself he comprehends the ungenerated cause of things generated, and further, and prior to this, the ageless and abiding cause of the life of the imperishable bodies.

    Now as for what it was right to say about the substance of this god, though the greater part has been omitted, nevertheless much has been said. But since the multitude of his powers and the beauty of his activities is so great that we shall now exceed the limit of what we observed about his substance,—for it is natural that when divine things come forth into the region of the visible they should be multiplied, in virtue of the superabundance of life and life-generating power in them,—consider what I have to do. For now I must strip for a plunge into this fathomless sea, though I have barely, and as best I might, taken breath, after the first part of this discourse. Venture I must, nevertheless, and putting my trust in the god endeavour to handle the theme. We must assume that what has just been said about his substance applies equally to his powers.689 For it cannot be that a god’s substance is one thing, and his power another, and his activity, by Zeus, a third thing besides these. For all that he wills he is, and can do, and puts into action. For he does not will what is not, nor does he lack power to do what he wills, nor does he desire to put into action what he cannot. In the case of a human being, however, this is otherwise. For his is a two-fold contending nature of soul and body compounded into one, the former divine, the latter dark and clouded. Naturally, therefore, there is a battle and a feud between them. And Aristotle also says that this is why neither the pleasures nor the pains in us harmonise with one another. For he says that what is pleasant to one of the natures within us is painful to the nature which is its opposite. But among the gods there is nothing of this sort. For from their very nature what is good belongs to them, and perpetually, not intermittently. In the first place, then, all that I said when I tried to show forth his substance, I must be considered to have said about his powers and activities also. And since in such cases the argument is naturally convertible, all that I observe next in order concerning his powers and activities must be considered to apply not to his activities only, but to his substance also. For verily there are gods related to Helios and of like substance who sum up the stainless nature of this god, and though in the visible world they are plural, in him they are one. And now listen first to what they assert who look at the heavens, not like horses and cattle, or some other unreasoning and ignorant animal,690 but from it draw their conclusions about the unseen world. But even before this, if you please, consider his supra-mundane powers and activities, and out of a countless number, observe but a few. First, then, of his powers is that through which he reveals the whole intellectual substance throughout as one, since he brings together its extremes. For even as in the world of sense-perception we can clearly discern air and water set between fire and earth,693 as the link that binds together the extremes, would one not reasonably suppose that, in the case of the cause which is separate from elements and prior to them—and though it is the principle of generation, is not itself generation—it is so ordered that, in that world also, the extreme causes which are wholly separate from elements are bound together into one through certain modes of mediation, by King Helios, and are united about him as their centre? And the creative power of Zeus also coincides with him, by reason of which in Cyprus, as I said earlier, shrines are founded and assigned to them in common. And Apollo himself also we called to witness to our statements, since it is certainly likely that he knows better than we about his own nature. For he too abides with Helios and is his colleague by reason of the singleness of his thoughts and the stability of his substance and the consistency of his activity. But Apollo too in no case appears to separate the dividing creative function of Dionysus694 from Helios. And since he always subordinates it to Helios and so indicates that Dionysus695 is his partner on the throne, Apollo is the interpreter for us of the fairest purposes that are to be found with our god. Further Helios, since he comprehends in himself all the principles of the fairest intellectual synthesis, is himself Apollo the leader of the Muses. And since he fills the whole of our life with fair order, he begat Asclepios696 in the world, though even before the beginning of the world he had him by his side. But though one should survey many other powers that belong to this god, never could one investigate them all. It is enough to have observed the following: That there is an equal and identical dominion of Helios and Zeus over the separate creation which is prior to substances, in the region, that is to say, of the absolute causes which, separated from visible creation, existed prior to it; secondly we observed the singleness of his thoughts which is bound up with the imperishableness and abiding sameness that he shares with Apollo; thirdly, the dividing part of his creative function which he shares with Dionysus who controls divided substance; fourthly we have observed the power of the leader of the Muses, revealed in fairest symmetry and blending of the intellectual; finally we comprehended that Helios, with Asclepios, fulfils the fair order of the whole of life. So much then in respect to those powers of his that existed before the beginning of the world; and co-ordinate with these are his works over the whole visible world, in that he fills it with good gifts. For since he is the genuine son of the Good and from it has received his blessed lot in fulness of perfection, he himself distributes that blessedness to the intellectual gods, bestowing on them a beneficent and perfect nature. This then is one of his works. And a second work of the god is his most perfect distribution of intelligible beauty among the intellectual and immaterial forms. For when the generative substance700 which is visible in our world desires to beget in the Beautiful701 and to bring forth offspring, it is further necessary that it should be guided by the substance that, in the region of intelligible beauty, does this very thing eternally and always and not intermittently, now fruitful now barren. For all that is beautiful in our world only at times, is beautiful always in the intelligible world. We must therefore assert that the ungenerated offspring in beauty intelligible and eternal guides the generative cause in the visible world; which offspring702 this god703 called into existence and keeps at his side, and to it he assigns also perfect reason. For just as through his light he gives sight to our eyes, so also among the intelligible gods through his intellectual counterpart—which he causes to shine far more brightly than his rays in our upper air—he bestows, as I believe, on all the intellectual gods the faculty of thought and of being comprehended by thought. Besides these, another marvellous activity of Helios the King of the All is that by which he endows with superior lot the nobler races—I mean angels, daemons,704 heroes, and those divided souls705 which remain in the category of model and archetype and never give themselves over to bodies. I have now described the substance of our god that is prior to the world and his powers and activities, celebrating Helios the King of the All in so far as it was possible for me to compass his praise. But since eyes, as the saying goes, are more trustworthy than hearing—although they are of course less trustworthy and weaker than the intelligence—come, let me endeavour to tell also of his visible creative function; but let first me entreat him to grant that I speak with some measure of success. From eternity there subsisted, surrounding Helios, the visible world, and from eternity the light that encompasses the world has its fixed station, not shining intermittently, nor in different ways at different times, but always in the same manner. And if one desired to comprehend, as far as the mind may, this eternal nature from the point of view of time, one would understand most easily of how many blessings for the world throughout eternity he is the cause, even Helios the King of the All who shines without cessation. Now I am aware that the great philosopher Plato,708 and after him a man who, though he is later in time, is by no means inferior to him in genius—I mean Iamblichus709 of Chalcis, who through his writings initiated me not only into other philosophic doctrines but these also—I am aware, I say, that they employed as a hypothesis the conception of a generated world, and assumed for it, so to speak, a creation in time in order that the magnitude of the works that arise from Helios might be recognised. But apart from the fact that I fall short altogether of their ability, I must by no means be so rash; especially since the glorious hero Iamblichus thought it was not without risk to assume, even as a bare hypothesis, a temporal limit for the creation of the world. Nay rather, the god came forth from an eternal cause, or rather brought forth all things from everlasting, engendering by his divine will and with untold speed and unsurpassed power, from the invisible all things now visible in present time. And then he assigned as his own station the mid-heavens, in order that from all sides he may bestow equal blessings on the gods who came forth by his agency and in company with him; and that he may guide the seven spheres710 in the heavens and the eighth sphere711 also, yes and as I believe the ninth creation too, namely our world which revolves for ever in a continuous cycle of birth and death. For it is evident that the planets, as they dance in a circle about him, preserve as the measure of their motion a harmony between this god and their own movements such as I shall now describe; and that the whole heaven also, which adapts itself to him in all its parts, is full of gods who proceed from Helios. For this god is lord of five zones in the heavens; and when he traverses three of these he begets in those three the three Graces.712 And the remaining zones are the scales of mighty Necessity.713 To the Greeks what I say is perhaps incomprehensible—as though one were obliged to say to them only what is known and familiar. Yet not even is this altogether strange to them as one might suppose. For who, then, in your opinion, are the Dioscuri,714 O ye most wise, ye who accept without question so many of your traditions? Do you not call them “alternate of days,” because they may not both be seen on the same day? It is obvious that by this you mean “yesterday” and “to-day.” But what does this mean, in the name of those same Dioscuri? Let me apply it to some natural object, so that I may not say anything empty and senseless. But no such object could one find, however carefully one might search for it. For the theory that some have supposed to be held by the theogonists, that the two hemispheres of the universe are meant, has no meaning. For how one could call each one of the hemispheres “alternate of days” is not easy to imagine, since the increase of their light in each separate day is imperceptible. But now let us consider a question on which some may think that I am innovating. We say correctly that those persons for whom the time of the sun’s course above the earth is the same in one and the same month share the same day. Consider therefore whether the expression “alternate of days” cannot be applied both to the tropics and the other, the polar, circles. But some one will object that it does not apply equally to both. For though the former are always visible, and both of them are visible at once to those who inhabit that part of the earth where shadows are cast in an opposite direction,715 yet in the case of the latter those who see the one do not see the other. However, not to dwell too long on the same subject; since he causes the winter and summer solstice, Helios is, as we know, the father of the seasons; and since he never forsakes the poles, he is Oceanus, the lord of two-fold substance. My meaning here is not obscure, is it, seeing that before my time Homer said the same thing “Oceanus who is the father of all things” yes, for mortals and for the blessed gods too, as he himself would say; and what he says is true. For there is no single thing in the whole of existence that is not the offspring of the substance of Oceanus. But what has that to do with the poles? Shall I tell you? It were better indeed to keep silence717; but for all that I will speak. Some say then, even though all men are not ready to believe it, that the sun travels in the starless heavens far above the region of the fixed stars. And on this theory he will not be stationed midmost among the planets but midway between the three worlds: that is, according to the hypothesis of the mysteries, if indeed one ought to use the word “hypothesis” and not rather say “established truths,” using the word “hypothesis” for the study of the heavenly bodies. For the priests of the mysteries tell us what they have been taught by the gods or mighty daemons, whereas the astronomers make plausible hypotheses from the harmony that they observe in the visible spheres. It is proper, no doubt, to approve the astronomers as well, but where any man thinks it better to believe the priests of the mysteries, him I admire and revere, both in jest and earnest. And so much for that, as the saying is. Now besides those whom I have mentioned, there is in the heavens a great multitude of gods who have been recognised as such by those who survey the heavens, not casually, nor like cattle. For as he divides the three spheres by four through the zodiac,724 which is associated with every one of the three, so he divides the zodiac also into twelve divine powers; and again he divides every one of these twelve by three, so as to make thirty-six gods in725 all. Hence, as I believe, there descends from above, from the heavens to us, a three-fold gift of the Graces: I mean from the spheres, for this god, by thus dividing them by four, sends to us the fourfold glory of the seasons, which express the changes of time. And indeed on our earth the Graces imitate a circle726 in their statues. And it is Dionysus who is the giver of the Graces, and in this very connection he is said to reign with Helios. Why should I go on to speak to you of Horus727 and of the other names of gods, which all belong to Helios? For from his works men have learned to know this god, who makes the whole heavens perfect through the gift of intellectual blessings, and gives it a share of intelligible beauty; and taking the heavens as their starting-point, they have learned to know him both as a whole and his parts also, from his abundant bestowal of good gifts. For he exercises control over all movement, even to the lowest plane of the universe. And everywhere he makes all things perfect, nature and soul and everything that exists. And marshalling together this great army of the gods into a single commanding unity, he handed it over to Athene Pronoia728 who, as the legend says, sprang from the head of Zeus, but I say that she was sent forth from Helios whole from the whole of him, being contained within him; though I disagree with the legend only so far as I assert that she came forth not from his highest part, but whole from the whole of him. For in other respects, since I believe that Zeus is in no wise different from Helios, I agree with that ancient tradition. And in using this very phrase Athene Pronoia, I am not innovating, if I rightly understand the words: “He came to Pytho and to grey-eyed Pronoia.” This proves that the ancients also thought that Athene Pronoia shared the throne of Apollo, who, as we believe, differs in no way from Helios. Indeed, did not Homer by divine inspiration—for he was, we may suppose, possessed by a god—reveal this truth, when he says often in his poems: “May I be honoured even as Athene and Apollo were honoured”—by Zeus, that is to say, who is identical with Helios? And just as King Apollo, through the singleness of his thoughts, is associated with Helios, so also we must believe that Athene735 has received her nature from Helios, and that she is his intelligence in perfect form: and so she binds together the gods who are assembled about Helios and brings them without confusion into unity with Helios, the King of the All: and she distributes and is the channel for stainless and pure life throughout the seven spheres, from the highest vault of the heavens as far as Selene the Moon:736 for Selene is the last of the heavenly spheres which Athene fills with wisdom: and by her aid Selene beholds the intelligible which is higher than the heavens, and adorns with its forms the realm of matter that lies below her, and thus she does away with its savagery and confusion and disorder. Moreover to mankind Athene gives the blessings of wisdom and intelligence and the creative arts. And surely she dwells in the capitols of cities because, through her wisdom, she has established the community of the state. I have still to say a few words about Aphrodite, who, as the wise men among the Phoenicians affirm, and as I believe, assists Helios in his creative function. She is, in very truth, a synthesis of the heavenly gods, and in their harmony she is the spirit of love and unity.737 For she738 is very near to Helios, and when she pursues the same course as he and approaches him, she fills the skies with fair weather and gives generative power to the earth: for she herself takes thought for the continuous birth of living things. And though of that continuous birth King Helios is the primary creative cause, yet Aphrodite is the joint cause with him, she who enchants our souls with her charm and sends down to earth from the upper air rays of light most sweet and stainless, aye, more lustrous than gold itself. I desire to mete out to you still more of the theology of the Phoenicians, and whether it be to some purpose my argument as it proceeds will show. The inhabitants of Emesa,739 a place from time immemorial sacred to Helios, associate with Helios in their temples Monimos and Azizos.740 Iamblichus, from whom I have taken this and all besides, a little from a great store, says that the secret meaning to be interpreted is that Monimos is Hermes and Azizos Ares, the assessors of Helios, who are the channel for many blessings to the region of our earth.

    Such then are the works of Helios in the heavens, and, when completed by means of the gods whom I have named, they reach even unto the furthest bounds of the earth. But to tell the number of all his works in the region below the moon would take too long. Nevertheless I must describe them also in a brief summary. Now I am aware that I mentioned them earlier when I claimed741 that from things visible we could observe the invisible properties of the god’s substance, but the argument demands that I should expound them now also, in their proper order.I said then that Helios holds sway among the intellectual gods in that he unites into one, about his own undivided substance, a great multitude of the gods: and further, I demonstrated that among the gods whom we can perceive, who revolve eternally in their most blessed path, he is leader and lord; since he bestows on their nature its generative power, and fills the whole heavens not only with visible rays of light but with countless other blessings that are invisible; and, further, that the blessings which are abundantly supplied by the other visible gods are made perfect by him, and that even prior to this the visible gods themselves are made perfect by his unspeakable and divine activity. In the same manner we must believe that on this our world of generation certain gods have alighted who are linked together with Helios: and these gods guide the four-fold nature of the elements, and inhabit, together with the three higher races,744 those souls which are upborne by the elements. But for the divided souls745 also, of how many blessings is he the cause! For he extends to them the faculty of judging, and guides them with justice, and purifies them by his brilliant light. Again, does he not set in motion the whole of nature and kindle life therein, by bestowing on it generative power from on high? But for the divided natures also, is not he the cause that they journey to their appointed end?746 For Aristotle says that man is begotten by man and the sun together. Accordingly the same theory about King Helios must surely apply to all the other activities of the divided souls. Again, does he not produce for us rain and wind and the clouds in the skies, by employing, as though it were matter, the two kinds of vapour? For when he heats the earth he draws up steam and smoke, and from these there arise not only the clouds but also all the physical changes on our earth, both great and small. But why do I deal with the same questions at such length, when I am free at last to come to my goal, though not till I have first celebrated all the blessings that Helios has given to mankind? For from him are we born, and by him are we nourished. But his more divine gifts, and all that he bestows on our souls when he frees them from the body and then lifts them up on high to the region of those substances that are akin to the god; and the fineness and vigour of his divine rays, which are assigned as a sort of vehicle for the safe descent of our souls into this world of generation; all this, I say, let others celebrate in fitting strains, but let me believe it rather than demonstrate its truth. However, I need not hesitate to discuss so much as is known to all. Plato says that the sky is our instructor in wisdom. For from its contemplation we have learned to know the nature of number, whose distinguishing characteristics we know only from the course of the sun. Plato himself says that day and night were created first.750 And next, from observing the moon’s light, which was bestowed on the goddess by Helios, we later progressed still further in the understanding of these matters: in every case conjecturing the harmony of all things with this god. For Plato himself says somewhere that our race was by nature doomed to toil, and so the gods pitied us and gave us Dionysus and the Muses as playfellows. And we recognised that Helios is their common lord, since he is celebrated as the father of Dionysus and the leader of the Muses. And has not Apollo, who is his colleague in empire, set up oracles in every part of the earth, and given to men inspired wisdom, and regulated their cities by means of religious and political ordinances? And he has civilised the greater part of the world by means of Greek colonies, and so made it easier for the world to be governed by the Romans. For the Romans themselves not only belong to the Greek race, but also the sacred ordinances and the pious belief in the gods which they have established and maintain are, from beginning to end, Greek. And beside this they have established a constitution not inferior to that of any one of the best governed states, if indeed it be not superior to all others that have ever been put into practice. For which reason I myself recognise that our city is Greek, both in descent and as to its constitution. Shall I now go on to tell you how Helios took thought for the health and safety of all men by begetting Asclepios752 to be the saviour of the whole world? and how he bestowed on us every kind of excellence by sending down to us Aphrodite together with Athene, and thus laid down for our protection what is almost a law, that we should only unite to beget our kind? Surely it is for this reason that, in agreement with the course of the sun, all plants and all the tribes of living things are aroused to bring forth their kind. What need is there for me to glorify his beams and his light? For surely everyone knows how terrible is night without a moon or stars, so that from this he can calculate how great a boon for us is the light of the sun? And this very light he supplies at night, without ceasing, and directly, from the moon in those upper spaces where it is needed, while he grants us through the night a truce from toil. But there would be no limit to the account if one should endeavour to describe all his gifts of this sort. For there is no single blessing in our lives which we do not receive as a gift from this god, either perfect from him alone, or, through the other gods, perfected by him. Moreover he is the founder of our city.755 For not only does Zeus, who is glorified as the father of all things, inhabit its citadel756 together with Athene and Aphrodite, but Apollo also dwells on the Palatine Hill, and Helios himself under this name of his which is commonly known to all and familiar to all. And I could say much to prove that we, the sons of Romulus and Aeneas, are in every way and in all respects connected with him, but I will mention briefly only what is most familiar. According to the legend, Aeneas is the son of Aphrodite, who is subordinate to Helios and is his kinswoman. And the tradition has been handed down that the founder of our city was the son of Ares, and the paradoxical element in the tale has been believed because of the portents which later appeared to support it. For a she-wolf, they say, gave him suck. Now I am aware that Ares, who is called Azizos by the Syrians who inhabit Emesa, precedes Helios in the sacred procession, but I mentioned it before, so I think I may let that pass. But why is the wolf sacred only to Ares and not to Helios? Yet men call the period of a year “lycabas,”757 which is derived from “wolf.” And not only Homer758 and the famous men of Greece call it by this name, but also the god himself, when he says: “With dancing does he bring to a close his journey of twelve months, even the lycabas.” Now do you wish me to bring forward a still greater proof that the founder of our city was sent down to earth, not by Ares alone, though perhaps some noble daemon with the character of Ares did take part in the fashioning of his mortal body, even he who is said to have visited Silvia760 when she was carrying water for the bath of the goddess,761 but the whole truth is that the soul of the god Quirinus762 came down to earth from Helios; for we must, I think, believe the sacred tradition. And the close conjunction of Helios and Selene, who share the empire over the visible world, even as it had caused his soul to descend to earth, in like manner caused to mount upwards him whom it received back from the earth, after blotting out with fire from a thunderbolt763 the mortal part of his body. So clearly did she who creates earthly matter, she whose place is at the furthest point below the sun, receive Quirinus when he was sent down to earth by Athene, goddess of Forethought; and when he took flight again from earth she led him back straightway to Helios, the King of the All. Do you wish me to mention yet another proof of this, I mean the work of King Numa?766 In Rome maiden priestesses767 guard the undying flame of the sun at different hours in turn; they guard the fire that is produced on earth by the agency of the god. And I can tell you a still greater proof of the power of this god, which is the work of that most divine king himself. The months are reckoned from the moon by, one may say, all other peoples; but we and the Egyptians alone reckon the days of every year according to the movements of the sun. If after this I should say that we also worship Mithras, and celebrate games in honour of Helios every four years, I shall be speaking of customs that are somewhat recent.768 But perhaps it is better to cite a proof from the remote past. The beginning of the cycle of the year is placed at different times by different peoples. Some place it at the spring equinox, others at the height of summer, and many in the late autumn; but they each and all sing the praises of the most visible gifts of Helios. One nation celebrates the season best adapted for work in the fields, when the earth bursts into bloom and exults, when all the crops are just beginning to sprout, and the sea begins to be safe for sailing; and the disagreeable, gloomy winter puts on a more cheerful aspect, others again award the crown to the summer season,769 since at that time they can safely feel confidence about the yield of the fruits, when the grains have already been harvested and midsummer is now at its height, and the fruits on the trees are ripening. Others again, with still more subtlety, regard as the close of the year the time when all the fruits are in their perfect prime and decay has already set in. For this reason they celebrate the annual festival of the New Year in late autumn. But our forefathers, from the time of the most divine king Numa, paid still greater reverence to the god Helios. They ignored the question of mere utility, I think, because they were naturally religious and endowed with unusual intelligence; but they saw that he is the cause of all that is useful, and so they ordered the observance of the New Year to correspond with the present season; that is to say when King Helios returns to us again, and leaving the region furthest south and, rounding Capricorn as though it were a goal-post, advances from the south to the north to give us our share of the blessings of the year. And that our forefathers, because they comprehended this correctly, thus established the beginning of the year, one may perceive from the following. For it was not, I think, the time when the god turns, but the time when he becomes visible to all men, as he travels from south to north, that they appointed for the festival. For still unknown to them was the nicety of those laws which the Chaldæans and Egyptians discovered, and which Hipparchus770 and Ptolemy771 perfected: but they judged simply by sense-perception, and were limited to what they could actually see. But the truth of these facts was recognised, as I said, by a later generation. Before the beginning of the year, at the end of the month which is called after Kronos,773 we celebrate in honour of Helios the most splendid games, and we dedicate the festival to the Invincible Sun. And after this it is not lawful to perform any of the shows that belong to the last month, gloomy as they are, though necessary. But, in the cycle, immediately after the end of the Kronia774 follow the Heliaia. That festival may the ruling gods grant me to praise and to celebrate with sacrifice! And above all the others may Helios himself, the King of the All, grant me this, even he who from eternity has proceeded from the generative substance of the Good: even he who is midmost of the midmost intellectual gods; who fills them with continuity and endless beauty and superabundance of generative power and perfect reason, yea with all blessings at once, and independently of time! And now he illumines his own visible abode, which from eternity moves as the centre of the whole heavens, and bestows a share of intelligible beauty on the whole visible world, and fills the whole heavens with the same number of gods as he contains in himself in intellectual form. And without division they reveal themselves in manifold form surrounding him, but they are attached to him to form a unity. Aye, but also, through his perpetual generation and the blessings that he bestows from the heavenly bodies, he holds together the region beneath the moon. For he cares for the whole human race in common, but especially for my own city,775 even as also he brought into being my soul from eternity, and made it his follower. All this, therefore, that I prayed for a moment ago, may he grant, and further may he, of his grace, endow my city as a whole with eternal existence, so far as is possible, and protect her; and for myself personally, may he grant that, so long as I am permitted to live, I may prosper in my affairs both human and divine; finally may he grant me to live and serve the state with my life, so long as is pleasing to himself and well for me and expedient for the Roman Empire! This discourse, friend Sallust,778 I composed in three nights at most, in harmony with the three-fold creative power of the god,779 as far as possible just as it occurred to my memory: and I have ventured to write it down and to dedicate it to you because you thought my earlier work on the Kronia780 was not wholly worthless. But if you wish to meet with a more complete and more mystical treatment of the same theme, then read the writings of the inspired Iamblichus on this subject,781 and you will find there the most consummate wisdom which man can achieve. And may mighty Helios grant that I too may attain to no less perfect knowledge of himself, and that I may instruct all men, speaking generally, but especially those who are worthy to learn. And so long as Helios grants let us all in common revere Iamblichus, the beloved of the gods. For he is the source for what I have here set down, a few thoughts from many, as they occurred to my mind. However I know well that no one can utter anything more perfect than he, nay not though he should labour long at the task and say very much that is new. For he will naturally diverge thereby from the truest knowledge of the god. Therefore it would probably have been a vain undertaking to compose anything after Iamblichus on the same subject if I had written this discourse for the sake of giving instruction. But since I wished to compose a hymn to express my gratitude to the god, I thought that this was the best place in which to tell, to the best of my power, of his essential nature. And so I think that not in vain has this discourse been composed. For the saying “To the extent of your powers offer sacrifice to the immortal gods,” I apply not to sacrifice only, but also to the praises that we offer to the gods. For the third time, therefore, I pray that Helios, the King of the All, may be gracious to me in recompense for this my zeal; and may he grant me a virtuous life and more perfect wisdom and inspired intelligence, and, when fate wills, the gentlest exit that may be from life, at a fitting hour; and that I may ascend to him thereafter and abide with him, for ever if possible, but if that be more than the actions of my life deserve, for many periods of many years! From – https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/48664/pg48664-images.html#note_668

    From The Works of The Emperor Julian, Vol. I, trans. Wilmer Cave Wright, Project Gutenberg e-book

  • A Blog

    Tariffs v Climate Heating

    In the past week a young lady with a famous surname has crossed Baffin Island solo, with a team to photograph and provide food and supplies, to highlight Climate Change. And in the past week global tariffs have been announced, the complexity of which are far above this writer’s pay grade, but which have created a limit on goods transported around the Earth. Of course this has a massively detrimental effect on hard working business owners who have worked hard in their business over the last few decades. But within the measurement of Earth and Sun, which one reduces the impact of humans onto the life zone, and which one increases? As one large Solar flare would stop all movement of modern supply chains anyway, could this be a pause time to observe reality.

  • A Blog

    2 – Drawing with a fine line (0.4mm)

  • A Blog

    Drawing a fine line, or drawing with a fine line (0.4mm)

  • A Logical Blog

    A Logical Question

    Yesterday was International Women’s Day, 8th March, 2025. In the name of gender equality, why is today not International Men’s Day, 9th March, 2025? Or 7th March, 2025? That would not look good for feminists so why is today, 9th March, 2025, not International Men’s Day? Or as men and women are polar opposites to give life under the magnificence of the Sun, why is 8th September, 2025, not set for International Men’s Day? Discuss.

  • The Logical View

    This domain has been set up to provide a place/space to write a short essay of 500-750 words, on anything and everything. This apparently nebulous parameter is actually the reverse, but only because of the start point. A baseline defines everything and if the baseline is nebulous the material which follows becomes meaningless when taken to its conclusion, because there is no end and there is nowhere to return to. The fact that there is such a thing as a conclusion is contained within this domain ethos, because it is only without a starting point and a conclusion that everything becomes subjective and meaningless. The point of the domain name The Logical View is therefore contained within the title.

    It will be written as a subscription blog (that word being likely a corruption of the old use of the word log, from the centuries when a human wrote by hand some report or details in a log book which related to something specific, observable and traceable, and could not be altered, and lasted for a long time if the log book did not get wet or burnt by fire). A subscription blog is an important distinction because by making a very small cost it puts a perimeter between neither joining the runaway moneymaking train of the western world nor being a free for all spouting on the worldwide web (a corruption of the astonishing work of the spider) and will avoid the reader becoming the commodity. It is also logical because any process without a perimeter is highly illogical, isn’t it.

    So, someone might ask, what then is the logical start point of this domain? Well, in a nutshell, the Logical View is anything which is measured from Earth and the natural world on its surface. Earth as rock, earth, water held together by the gravity of Helios forms a fundamental logos onto which the life zone can exist. The life zone is formed as all growing and living matter, in all dimensions from the tiniest amoeba and tiniest plant life up the complexity scale to the intelligent mind/body/spirit beings such as eagles, crows, wolves, collie dogs, large sea life, spiders, indigenous peoples. The life zone is a zone of symbiotic relationships in the groupings of different plant and animal and insect life, around an oak tree or a small area of habitat dependent on latitude, very particular climatic and resources, and topography.

    The human, of course, in-habits, lives within this domain on the surface of Earth. It is logical to say this is non-negotiable, undeniable (un-refutable, un-falsifiable), and that the human depends on Earth which depends on Helios for everything, to bring it into existence in this form in the first place and for continued life. This tension-traction of logos forms the parameter of this essay blog, written into a domain in the modern, technical, digital sense of the word. The modern industrial and now digital world depends on electricity to survive, not Helios, and therefore measures its logic to electricity. A solar flare on the scale of the Carrington Event in 1859, named after a human but merely an equation between Helios and Earth and nothing to do with a human at all, which could neither cause nor prevent it, would end all electrical practices of the modern human. This domain is written therefore on digital tech which would also end, but from the baseline of the fundamental logos of the equation between Helios and Earth. Any words therefore stand outside modern politics, prevailing legal mores, individual or national viewpoints, or personal identities because the measurement of facts is to Helios and Earth, not human to human.

  • Winter in Britain 2024

    This sure is a busy time of year

    After the fireworks of fizz and bangs

    And funny to think the week before that

    It was all just skellies and fangs.

    But now as Guy Fawkes is forgotten again

    And Christmas brings forth the heaving shelves

    Lapland News reports that Father Christmas has

    A threatened strike by Elves.

    They’re saying that Amazon pays much more

    And the DPD courier drops

    Are so much easier from warehouse and van

    Than from a sledge across snowy rooftops

    And none of the yearly scraps with the cats

    Who wait up just to take the mick

    Sure, no mince pies nor sherry neither,

    Brought back by Father Nick.

    So, they say, they’re hanging up

    Their livery of red and green

    Because what is the point of hours of graft

    When children now just want a screen.

    They’ve discussed with the Reindeer

    Who said, ‘We agree,

    We’ll demand rate of inflation plus 50%

    And then sit back and wait to see…’

    And children themselves they just sit in the warm

    Fixated on swipe after swipe on their phone

    As the magic unfolds their eyes do grow glazed

    And the magic of Santa was never known

    While Santa himself burns the midnight oil 

    On strikes, NI hike, can he carry on anymore,

    How long will it be before a ‘For Sale’ sign appears

    On his once industrious workshop door?

    © AEMWR 2024